I have a question about the concept of a fiduciary relationship. Do pharmaceutical companies have a fiduciary relationship, say with stockholders? Would injecting people with an NIH patented "stabilized spike protein" mRNA jab which is, in essence, a bioweapon count as upholding a fiduciary relationship? If you kill your stockholders …
I have a question about the concept of a fiduciary relationship. Do pharmaceutical companies have a fiduciary relationship, say with stockholders? Would injecting people with an NIH patented "stabilized spike protein" mRNA jab which is, in essence, a bioweapon count as upholding a fiduciary relationship? If you kill your stockholders or render the stock worthless through malfeasance is that also contrary to a fiduciary relationship?
I have a question about the concept of a fiduciary relationship. Do pharmaceutical companies have a fiduciary relationship, say with stockholders? Would injecting people with an NIH patented "stabilized spike protein" mRNA jab which is, in essence, a bioweapon count as upholding a fiduciary relationship? If you kill your stockholders or render the stock worthless through malfeasance is that also contrary to a fiduciary relationship?