Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sukey Watson's avatar

In recent posts by Katherine Watts ( Bailiwick ) and Sasha Latyapova suggest that this specific Veritas project was actually a DOD/DARPA/BARDA setup to destroy the current iteration of Pfizer. This actually makes perfect sense since Pfizer is being unveiled by having had to release their study data, as well as the mounting problems that have occurred with their version of the mRNA vaccine ( Moderna also, but there is much less info on their product and they have not undergone them intense scrutiny mounted towards Pfizer ). Their premise is that the only thing really being sacrificed is the Pfizer brand. Easy enough to create a new brand, wrist slap few execs. and then most of the house staff goes to whatever new company the DOD/DARPA/BARDA ( CIA/NAS security state apparatchiks? ) create. While this is an utterly dark interpretation, at this point I cannot discount it. What do you all think?

Expand full comment
Laura Hayes's avatar

Waiting for Robert Malone, along with others, like McCullough, Cole, Malhotra, etc., to publicly state that they are vehemently opposed to any and all medical mandates, including those for children to attend school and daycare, and for those in the military. Until they declare such a stance publicly, they are not freedom fighters.

There can be no medical mandates in a free and ethical society. Never. Including times labeled as an “emergency”.

A simple “no thank you” should always suffice when wants to decline or refuse a medical treatment or procedure for oneself or one’s child, without any government interference, coercion, penalty, or cost.

Expand full comment
224 more comments...

No posts