From the US Nursing home data, we can now prove that the vaccines increased the odds of death from COVID by 6%. I need 20 data scientists to validate my work before I submit to a journal.
Updated article about Carlos... many people commented about this...
Basically, Carlos thought it must be flawed since it disagreed with the narrative, so he dared me to try to get it published, thinking that would be the end of that.
So we'll make sure to have 20 reviewers endorse it before we submit it.
6% doesn’t sound like much… So please bring perspective to your final peer reviewed article by saying that relative to the advertised efficacy. The actual efficacy was 96% different than advertised.
FYI, I referred your article to a statistician that I know. I hope she takes the challenge to help you.
Great job Steve! One thing: you discarded the data showing "deaths > cases", yet that data might prove that the shots increased all-cause mortality by the other severe effects! Maybe that could be another study!
In most countries, all-cause mortality increased by about 20% due to the injectable bio-bomb. Lower in the elderly and higher in the younger.
By the way, have you seen this? the CDC table recognized myocarditis due to the mRNA shots yet kept pushing them on children and teens in spite there was no child dying from COVID death since jan 2021 according to their own stats:
I'm just surprised the % were not far higher adding in the wonderful Remdesivir and magic ventilators they used to finish off the more stubborn old critters!
So, assuming counter productive placebos never really existed, 75% of the planet's population have now been GENETICALLY MODIFIED? We didn't feel safe having GM experiments in food production because of unknown effects and dangers, so without warning or notification, they hid the crap in their "Safe & Effective" (useless and deadly) Covid injections they pretended were VACCINES'.
To add INSULT TO INJURY, Pfizer & Moderna deny all LIABILITY for anything that goes wrong following the gullible accepting their depopulating injections. ZERO LIABILITY means no consequences or admission of guilt or when the injected keel over with serious life impacting injuries, blood clots, heart issues and deaths. So you've been Genetically Modified and have had your life expectancy reduced.
Could us Proud Conspiracy Theorists have been correct all along? Why would such devious practices be undertaken by those that think they 'control' us? They have a hidden agenda under the disguise of the World Economic Forum smoke screen. It's their image of their New World Order, where the majority of 'useless eating surfs' (that's you and me) are culled to reduce Global Warming. Those that avoided the slaughter will be put to unpaid work to function as their SLAVES.
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed because I joined the dots.
STEVE VERY SAD DEATH FIGURES. THIS IS FOR A SHORT PERIOD AFTER JAB AS NOT A VACCINE. THE REAL PROBLEM IS WHAT IS IN THE JAB.IT IS MADE FROM OIL. IT CONTAINS SPIKE PROTENE SAME AS IN SNAKE VENOM. SPIKE PROTINE IS AN BAD SUBSTANCE TO BE PUT IN THE BODY AND IT REPLICATES ITSELF. ONE HAS TO LOOK AT DEATH RECORDS FOR 6 MONTHA AND A YEAR. THERE WAS A REPORT AND I DO NOT DISBELIEVE IT. THAT NANO PARTICALS ARE IN THE JAB. THEY RESPOND TO A SPECIAL 5 G SIGNAL. CONSTRICTION IS THE AIM. POSSIBLY NOT ENOUGHF 5 G REPETERS IN USE AS PLANNED ON MOST STREET CORNERS. THE BIG PROBLEM IS WHY CANNOT THE JAB GET A LICENCE. ONLY 1/3 RD REMAINS IN THE ARM MUSTLE. ALL SHOULD DO TO SLOW RELEASE. 2/3RDS IMMIDEATLY LEAVES THE ARE MUSTLE AND SPREADS OVER THE BODY POSSIBLY SERIOUS DAMAGE. SOME SEEM TO SUFFER SERIOUS REACTIONS PROBLEMS SOON AFTER THE JAB. YOU STEVE KNOW WHAT THE RESULTS ARE. OTHERS THEY SEEM OK BUT NO FOLLOW UP RECORDS AND WOULD THE MEDICAL PROBLEMS BE IDENTIFIED WITH THE JAB?. WE IN UK HAVE SADFL;Y STARTED A NEW JAB FOR OLDER PEOPLE WITH AN EXAGERATED SPLATER OF NEW COVID VERSION. IT IS MILD WITH NO SPIKES. THEY ARE TRYING TO FRIGHTGEN US INTO BEING JABES AS BEFORE USING FEAR TACTICS. ONE AS MILD COVID IF ONE WAS TO CATCH IT ONE WILL THEN HAVE NATURAL IMMUNITY.THAT GONE IF JABBED. THANK YOU STEVE FOR CONTINUING WITH THE FIGHT INJ SPITE OF ALL THE NASTY ATTACKS. YOU ARE ON THE WINNING SIDE BUT THE JABBERS AND BIG PHARMA WITH $BILLIONS WILL NOT GIVE UP EASELY BECAUSE MUCH TO LOOSE AND HUGE COMPENSATIONS COULD BREAK THE.
Rooting for you and your work, as always. Not sure I can thank you enough. When I look around my messy house and 2 kids that need all my attention, I am comforted knowing someone like you is talking the talk and walking the walk. Wish I could do more... I feel very guilty some days. Other days I can barely keep it together and so I recognize advocacy on a large scale isn’t in my cards at the moment. Things will work out, Im sure and it will be (in large part) because of efforts like this!
As you probably know, the most widely used test, the PCR, produces false positives something like 90% of the time when the cycle threshold is cranked up to the 30's as it was for most of the plandemic. I'm far from an authority on this, but even Fauci and Walensky admitted it finally and it's pretty much a no-brainer for those in the field. Obviously then, the purpose of the over cycled PCR was to inflate the "Covid cases." It was totally premeditated. Why? Probably, to peg the fear meter so we'd all think the world is a scary place and we need Big Government to live. Why did they want us to think that? That's the $64,000 question. Was it to maximize the effectiveness of the pandemic response for our own good (national anthem playing in the background)? Was it to maximize Big Pharma profit? Was it to maximize uptake of a shot designed to reduce the world population? Was it to facilitate institution of digital ID and the Social Credit Score?
From the staff we had out for 14 then 10 days after no symptoms, I don't doubt that. Then, I swore I had the bug, but I never tested positive. I don't think any of the managers did!
#2, one of the pre vaccine treatments that had real promise, was Sorento's Monoclonal Antibody's, but somehow this never materialized because it would have stopped the vax like ivermectin. If you search for sorrento, you will see that shortly after that, they signed a $34M contract with DARPA To Develop Neutralizing Antibodies For COVID-19. I wonder what happened with that. Sounds like they are trying to hide a cure again.
Monoclonals were pulled allegedly because they lost effectiveness with new variants. I suspect it's because too many recipients started dealing with new or worsen autoimmune/multi-system diseases as warned in this study.
Steve, there are a couple things that I would like you opinion on that no one talks about. #1 Is Naomi Wolfe research on side effects, one was covid. I think it was either 8% of people came down with covid or else 8% of the side effects were covid. This explains why there was an outbreak in Antarctica where everyone was tested and vaccinated. Also, by vaccinating people, this pretty much guarantees that there is going to be an outbreak everywhere. It also kind of explains why the vaccinated are getting more cases as the vaccine is giving them covid and the highly vaccinated populations are then exposed to more covid.
The inventor Dr. Kary Mullis repetitively said his PCR tech is not capable of diagnosing any disease. The sick-care mafia ignored him and has been using it to diagnose many of them. Some injured from the other vaxxes have reported also receiving positive results for COVID on these tests.
I don't know what's actually in the COVID shots. I've seen a lot of claims and videos. The injected injured have been reporting several thousands of reactions which are the same as the infected injured. Injured in almost all the other vaxxes have been reporting hundreds to thousands.
A shot recipient intentionally infects himself with whatever. He or someone nearby can become symptomatic from that. Back in 2021 when people were proudly boasting about receiving the COVID shots, a smaller subset of them posted their pet developed a tumor, neuro problems, or rapid/sudden death within a week. They didn't connect the two events.
Honestly boss, I'm not impressed by this emphasis on IFR. IFR is the fatality rate of those exposed to the virus, and practically speaking, who could be determined to have been exposed, eg surveys of antibodies. And variations.
You dont really have an IFR here that I can see. To reduce the CFR/IFR by 4.5 as per point 5 is circular?
I dont get why ACM is not sufficient. I understand particularly going after covid deaths as that is a direct link to the purpose of the vaccination, sure. But man, all that mess in what is a case? PCR tests as designed to inflate case numbers are embedded in the data you are using. And despite gymnastics I dont feel you have an IFR in hand. You need a method of reliably or fairly reliably determining who has been exposed to the virus, and I dont feel your explanation how 'staff know who is sick' is anything other than counter to your aim, eg the POINT of IFR is those not visibly sick are signifcant in mortality estimates, right? Hence the brute force reduction by 4.5. Its just messy, and more important, ARGUABLE.
I suspect you got it more or less right. It can be done, I made some calls on forest yield as were borne out by time based on the sketchiest of data collected for other purposes. That you are likely right is not important however. You need to be beyond argument too. Because normies look for any reason to discount bad things they hear, that make them feel bad, they will seize on anything to discount such.
Most folk would respond to 'death rates increased in nursing homes after jab rollout, huh?" [EDIT or even "death rates were similar after vax rollout, they did nothing, huh?"] I understand you wish the extra 'ooomph' of the thing the jab was to prevent itself got provably worse, however wouldn't the quoted sentence be sufficient, and far easier to present and 'prove'?
Glad you are back and working full energy as always. A force for good, I and so many others benefit from your energy and dedication.
EDIT2 - and take your meds man! You are important in the unfolding of the plan, the resistance to that....... can we assume you are full on with Bromelain, Nattokinease, Curcumin? We dont need you dropping of some 'puzzling and sudden' cardiac or other event. I hope your holiday recharged sufficiently, hard to do these days. I suggest music as an additional mitigant. It works.
"Involvement of Penn in ACTIV-6 Ivermectin Misconduct
Dr. Susan Ellenberg, a voting member of the ACTIV-6 independent data monitoring committee, was a member of biostatistics and medical ethics and health policy at Penn.
A world expert on trial design, Ellenberg could not have missed all the wrongful actions done in this trial. She and about 50 people in those two departments had to have been privy to the problematic to deceitful decisions involved in the trial and Dr. Ellenberg’s involvement, including the director of biostatistics, Dr. Jeffrey Morris, chairman of medical ethics and health policy, Dr. Steven Joffe, former member of the Biden coronavirus taskforce, Dr. Ezekial Emanuel and recently an Dr. Neil Fishman, infectious disease physician and CMO Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
This author posits that Penn had conflict of interest, as again, ivermectin could have emerged as a competitive approach to mass vaccination, at least for some that sought other options. Penn received around $1.7 billion from Moderna for Drs. Kariko and Weissman’s work on their vaccine according to recent piece in the Philadelphia Inquirer written by Abraham Guttman. See the link. "
10pm Oct 8: added major new material showing just how devastating these numbers are.
See the section: Additional evidence relevant to the nursing home data
Deliberate pre-meditated murder? Mick.
Updated article about Carlos... many people commented about this...
Basically, Carlos thought it must be flawed since it disagreed with the narrative, so he dared me to try to get it published, thinking that would be the end of that.
So we'll make sure to have 20 reviewers endorse it before we submit it.
Steve,
6% doesn’t sound like much… So please bring perspective to your final peer reviewed article by saying that relative to the advertised efficacy. The actual efficacy was 96% different than advertised.
FYI, I referred your article to a statistician that I know. I hope she takes the challenge to help you.
Fred.
how would I know? did she sign up on the form?
Great job Steve! One thing: you discarded the data showing "deaths > cases", yet that data might prove that the shots increased all-cause mortality by the other severe effects! Maybe that could be another study!
In most countries, all-cause mortality increased by about 20% due to the injectable bio-bomb. Lower in the elderly and higher in the younger.
By the way, have you seen this? the CDC table recognized myocarditis due to the mRNA shots yet kept pushing them on children and teens in spite there was no child dying from COVID death since jan 2021 according to their own stats:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-myocarditis-mammoth-in-the-er
Was this on purpose?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination
it was covid deaths vs. covid cases so in theory, death<cases.
Discarding this data eliminates objections from people who could accuse me of not cleaning the data.
Great work, thank you
Hi Steve, this rollout of experimental toxic, harm so called vaccines must be stopped . This is harmful: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/routine-vaccinations-linked-with-lower-alzheimers-risk#How-might-vaccines-lower-Alzheimers-risk
Brilliant work Steve! AGAIN!!!
I'm just surprised the % were not far higher adding in the wonderful Remdesivir and magic ventilators they used to finish off the more stubborn old critters!
So, assuming counter productive placebos never really existed, 75% of the planet's population have now been GENETICALLY MODIFIED? We didn't feel safe having GM experiments in food production because of unknown effects and dangers, so without warning or notification, they hid the crap in their "Safe & Effective" (useless and deadly) Covid injections they pretended were VACCINES'.
To add INSULT TO INJURY, Pfizer & Moderna deny all LIABILITY for anything that goes wrong following the gullible accepting their depopulating injections. ZERO LIABILITY means no consequences or admission of guilt or when the injected keel over with serious life impacting injuries, blood clots, heart issues and deaths. So you've been Genetically Modified and have had your life expectancy reduced.
Could us Proud Conspiracy Theorists have been correct all along? Why would such devious practices be undertaken by those that think they 'control' us? They have a hidden agenda under the disguise of the World Economic Forum smoke screen. It's their image of their New World Order, where the majority of 'useless eating surfs' (that's you and me) are culled to reduce Global Warming. Those that avoided the slaughter will be put to unpaid work to function as their SLAVES.
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed because I joined the dots.
Steve, have you reached out to Professor Norman Fenton at Queen Mary College, University Of London?
https://www.normanfenton.com/
STEVE VERY SAD DEATH FIGURES. THIS IS FOR A SHORT PERIOD AFTER JAB AS NOT A VACCINE. THE REAL PROBLEM IS WHAT IS IN THE JAB.IT IS MADE FROM OIL. IT CONTAINS SPIKE PROTENE SAME AS IN SNAKE VENOM. SPIKE PROTINE IS AN BAD SUBSTANCE TO BE PUT IN THE BODY AND IT REPLICATES ITSELF. ONE HAS TO LOOK AT DEATH RECORDS FOR 6 MONTHA AND A YEAR. THERE WAS A REPORT AND I DO NOT DISBELIEVE IT. THAT NANO PARTICALS ARE IN THE JAB. THEY RESPOND TO A SPECIAL 5 G SIGNAL. CONSTRICTION IS THE AIM. POSSIBLY NOT ENOUGHF 5 G REPETERS IN USE AS PLANNED ON MOST STREET CORNERS. THE BIG PROBLEM IS WHY CANNOT THE JAB GET A LICENCE. ONLY 1/3 RD REMAINS IN THE ARM MUSTLE. ALL SHOULD DO TO SLOW RELEASE. 2/3RDS IMMIDEATLY LEAVES THE ARE MUSTLE AND SPREADS OVER THE BODY POSSIBLY SERIOUS DAMAGE. SOME SEEM TO SUFFER SERIOUS REACTIONS PROBLEMS SOON AFTER THE JAB. YOU STEVE KNOW WHAT THE RESULTS ARE. OTHERS THEY SEEM OK BUT NO FOLLOW UP RECORDS AND WOULD THE MEDICAL PROBLEMS BE IDENTIFIED WITH THE JAB?. WE IN UK HAVE SADFL;Y STARTED A NEW JAB FOR OLDER PEOPLE WITH AN EXAGERATED SPLATER OF NEW COVID VERSION. IT IS MILD WITH NO SPIKES. THEY ARE TRYING TO FRIGHTGEN US INTO BEING JABES AS BEFORE USING FEAR TACTICS. ONE AS MILD COVID IF ONE WAS TO CATCH IT ONE WILL THEN HAVE NATURAL IMMUNITY.THAT GONE IF JABBED. THANK YOU STEVE FOR CONTINUING WITH THE FIGHT INJ SPITE OF ALL THE NASTY ATTACKS. YOU ARE ON THE WINNING SIDE BUT THE JABBERS AND BIG PHARMA WITH $BILLIONS WILL NOT GIVE UP EASELY BECAUSE MUCH TO LOOSE AND HUGE COMPENSATIONS COULD BREAK THE.
A new study shows that those who died in the 1918 pandemic were largely nutritionally deficient people: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/09/health/1918-flu-skeletons.html
Rooting for you and your work, as always. Not sure I can thank you enough. When I look around my messy house and 2 kids that need all my attention, I am comforted knowing someone like you is talking the talk and walking the walk. Wish I could do more... I feel very guilty some days. Other days I can barely keep it together and so I recognize advocacy on a large scale isn’t in my cards at the moment. Things will work out, Im sure and it will be (in large part) because of efforts like this!
Their excuse for ignoring VAERS is they don't trust the numbers. What's their excuse here?
As you probably know, the most widely used test, the PCR, produces false positives something like 90% of the time when the cycle threshold is cranked up to the 30's as it was for most of the plandemic. I'm far from an authority on this, but even Fauci and Walensky admitted it finally and it's pretty much a no-brainer for those in the field. Obviously then, the purpose of the over cycled PCR was to inflate the "Covid cases." It was totally premeditated. Why? Probably, to peg the fear meter so we'd all think the world is a scary place and we need Big Government to live. Why did they want us to think that? That's the $64,000 question. Was it to maximize the effectiveness of the pandemic response for our own good (national anthem playing in the background)? Was it to maximize Big Pharma profit? Was it to maximize uptake of a shot designed to reduce the world population? Was it to facilitate institution of digital ID and the Social Credit Score?
From the staff we had out for 14 then 10 days after no symptoms, I don't doubt that. Then, I swore I had the bug, but I never tested positive. I don't think any of the managers did!
#2, one of the pre vaccine treatments that had real promise, was Sorento's Monoclonal Antibody's, but somehow this never materialized because it would have stopped the vax like ivermectin. If you search for sorrento, you will see that shortly after that, they signed a $34M contract with DARPA To Develop Neutralizing Antibodies For COVID-19. I wonder what happened with that. Sounds like they are trying to hide a cure again.
Monoclonals were pulled allegedly because they lost effectiveness with new variants. I suspect it's because too many recipients started dealing with new or worsen autoimmune/multi-system diseases as warned in this study.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33584709/
Steve, there are a couple things that I would like you opinion on that no one talks about. #1 Is Naomi Wolfe research on side effects, one was covid. I think it was either 8% of people came down with covid or else 8% of the side effects were covid. This explains why there was an outbreak in Antarctica where everyone was tested and vaccinated. Also, by vaccinating people, this pretty much guarantees that there is going to be an outbreak everywhere. It also kind of explains why the vaccinated are getting more cases as the vaccine is giving them covid and the highly vaccinated populations are then exposed to more covid.
The inventor Dr. Kary Mullis repetitively said his PCR tech is not capable of diagnosing any disease. The sick-care mafia ignored him and has been using it to diagnose many of them. Some injured from the other vaxxes have reported also receiving positive results for COVID on these tests.
I don't know what's actually in the COVID shots. I've seen a lot of claims and videos. The injected injured have been reporting several thousands of reactions which are the same as the infected injured. Injured in almost all the other vaxxes have been reporting hundreds to thousands.
A shot recipient intentionally infects himself with whatever. He or someone nearby can become symptomatic from that. Back in 2021 when people were proudly boasting about receiving the COVID shots, a smaller subset of them posted their pet developed a tumor, neuro problems, or rapid/sudden death within a week. They didn't connect the two events.
Honestly boss, I'm not impressed by this emphasis on IFR. IFR is the fatality rate of those exposed to the virus, and practically speaking, who could be determined to have been exposed, eg surveys of antibodies. And variations.
You dont really have an IFR here that I can see. To reduce the CFR/IFR by 4.5 as per point 5 is circular?
I dont get why ACM is not sufficient. I understand particularly going after covid deaths as that is a direct link to the purpose of the vaccination, sure. But man, all that mess in what is a case? PCR tests as designed to inflate case numbers are embedded in the data you are using. And despite gymnastics I dont feel you have an IFR in hand. You need a method of reliably or fairly reliably determining who has been exposed to the virus, and I dont feel your explanation how 'staff know who is sick' is anything other than counter to your aim, eg the POINT of IFR is those not visibly sick are signifcant in mortality estimates, right? Hence the brute force reduction by 4.5. Its just messy, and more important, ARGUABLE.
I suspect you got it more or less right. It can be done, I made some calls on forest yield as were borne out by time based on the sketchiest of data collected for other purposes. That you are likely right is not important however. You need to be beyond argument too. Because normies look for any reason to discount bad things they hear, that make them feel bad, they will seize on anything to discount such.
Most folk would respond to 'death rates increased in nursing homes after jab rollout, huh?" [EDIT or even "death rates were similar after vax rollout, they did nothing, huh?"] I understand you wish the extra 'ooomph' of the thing the jab was to prevent itself got provably worse, however wouldn't the quoted sentence be sufficient, and far easier to present and 'prove'?
Glad you are back and working full energy as always. A force for good, I and so many others benefit from your energy and dedication.
EDIT2 - and take your meds man! You are important in the unfolding of the plan, the resistance to that....... can we assume you are full on with Bromelain, Nattokinease, Curcumin? We dont need you dropping of some 'puzzling and sudden' cardiac or other event. I hope your holiday recharged sufficiently, hard to do these days. I suggest music as an additional mitigant. It works.
The following Op-ed in Trial Site News (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/u.s.-academic-medicines-role-in-covid-19-61e50761) on Academia's role in COVID-19 makes very interesting reading, since it names names of people and institutions. Steve would be particularly interested in the following section:
"Involvement of Penn in ACTIV-6 Ivermectin Misconduct
Dr. Susan Ellenberg, a voting member of the ACTIV-6 independent data monitoring committee, was a member of biostatistics and medical ethics and health policy at Penn.
A world expert on trial design, Ellenberg could not have missed all the wrongful actions done in this trial. She and about 50 people in those two departments had to have been privy to the problematic to deceitful decisions involved in the trial and Dr. Ellenberg’s involvement, including the director of biostatistics, Dr. Jeffrey Morris, chairman of medical ethics and health policy, Dr. Steven Joffe, former member of the Biden coronavirus taskforce, Dr. Ezekial Emanuel and recently an Dr. Neil Fishman, infectious disease physician and CMO Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
This author posits that Penn had conflict of interest, as again, ivermectin could have emerged as a competitive approach to mass vaccination, at least for some that sought other options. Penn received around $1.7 billion from Moderna for Drs. Kariko and Weissman’s work on their vaccine according to recent piece in the Philadelphia Inquirer written by Abraham Guttman. See the link. "
More info on Penn's involvement with the COVID-19 vaccines can be found at the following URL (https://nationalfile.com/university-funds-bidens-think-tank-hosts-factcheck-org-contract-biontech-gets-paid-vaccine-sales-fda-approvals/).
You should get in touch or do an interview with Professor Angus Dalgleish. See Dr Campell's you tube interview with him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnJ5T1Enwq4&t=1088s