Discover more from Steve Kirsch's newsletter
The right way to handle the pandemic
I get calls from state and federal officials all the time asking about how I would handle the pandemic. So I thought I'd make a substack article that they could all read and implement.
OK, I was kidding about getting calls from public officials. It was a joke. No public official is going to call me asking for advice. They all get their orders from up top.
But if I ever did get a call, here are some changes I would recommend.
NOTE: This is not a complete list. Nor have a spent time refining it. It is just a collection of some of the most obvious changes I think need to be considered.
Stop the vaccines now. The current COVID vaccines kill more people than they can possibly save from COVID, even if they were 100% effective so should be taken off the market immediately. For example, the vaccine may kill 117 kids for every kid that is saved from COVID.
The liability exemption is now lifted retroactively. Patients who have been harmed by the COVID vaccines can now sue the drug company for damages up to $100M per case of fatality or disability.
Every post-vaccination ailment, affliction and death appearing within 4 weeks of vaccination that appears at a rate of 10X or more vs. baseline should be attributed to the vaccine unless and until proven otherwise, by irrefutable evidence, with costs of all diagnostic procedures to be born by the pharmaceutical manufacturer.
For future approved vaccines, informed consent provide shall include any and all symptoms that are elevated in VAERS by 10X or more over “baseline” reporting rates.
For future approved vaccines, require autopsies for anyone who dies within 2 weeks of getting the vaccine. The autopsy reports should be posted in a public database with Names and other PHI related data redacted
Failure to file a VAERS report for anyone who dies within 30 days of COVID vaccination shall be liable to a fine of $100,000 per incident.
If for some reason, we couldn’t stop the vaccine, then everyone should be required to read and sign an informed consent prior to getting vaccinated. Here are some options:
Instruct public health officers to recommend that businesses post signs saying WARNING: face masks are NOT recommended. They have not been shown to stop COVID and mask wearing may be harmful to your health.
There should be no restrictions whatsoever placed on any person who has recovered from a COVID infection since these people cannot transmit future infections. So any sort of testing requirement shall not apply to these people.
Vaccinated and unvaccinated people should be treated the same way since they are equally likely to be infected or spread COVID. So if there is a testing protocol, it must treat vax and unvaxed the same. Same is true for hospitalized patients: there shouldn’t be a separate facility for vaxed vs. unvaxed: they should be treated the same way.
Lockdowns for COVID are now illegal. COVID is endemic. We are all going to get it sooner or later. So let’s just get it over with and move on. Once you are infected, treat with early treatment and now you are unable to transmit any subsequent re-infection to others.
It shall be illegal to coerce anyone to get any vaccination of any type. That goes for military, employer, school, etc. mandates. Vaccination shall be solely up to the individual. People should never be threatened with termination for not being vaccinated. This is especially silly for a vaccine which is toxic and relatively ineffective.
It shall be illegal for any organization to require anyone to wear a mask. Mask wearing should be completely at the option of the wearer. For people who are convinced they work, fine, go wear the mask knowing you will be protected (even though you won’t be).
Inadequately tested drugs
Newly approved drugs with less than a 1 year safety record shall be so labelled by the drug manufacturer in a prominent place that the long-term effects of the drug are unknown.
Put all early treatment protocols with a 95% or higher hospitalization and/or death reduction in clinical practice in hospitalization on a list of recommended treatments in the NIH COVID treatment guidelines
Any drug with at least one positive Phase 3 result (effect size 20% or better) or at least one published systematic-review and meta analysis for use against COVID shall be listed as recommended on the NIH treatment guidelines.
Supplements with a 20% effect size or greater in clinical trials shall be listed as recommended.
All public health officials shall encourage the public to talk to their doctors about the approved early treatment drug / supplement protocols listed on the NIH website.
The public should be encouraged to have on hand drugs for at least one of the early treatment drug / supplement protocol.
Doctors shall comply with patient requests for medications to be administered if there is a sound scientific basis for the request and no sound scientific basis for denying the request. Physicians who ignore this are subject to having their license to practice revoked.
Right to medicine
Revoke the license of any pharmacist who refuses to fill a prescription for an off-label drug where 1) there is clear scientific evidence of a benefit OR 2) where the medication is prescribed in dosages that have been shown to be safe (e.g., dosages approved for the labelled use). This allows a pharmacist to act as a double-check on a physician’s prescription (e.g., to avoid typos, etc) but keeps the pharmacist from second-guessing the prescription.
Any publisher who revokes or causes publication delay of a scientific paper without a scientific reason, shall be liable for damages to the author of $100,000 per day.
Scientists can, for good cause, publish papers anonymously (the journal will know). This protects research groups from retribution for publishing “unpopular” science such as confirming the Gundry study. See my article about the Gundry study confirmation where the science was suppressed because the authors were afraid of losing grant money.
There needs to be clear scientific evidence whether this is effective or not. In general, people should make their own personal choice on this. I wish there was a paper showing the effect on transmission versus distance. 6 feet seems a bit too contrived to make me comfortable it is the “right” number people should pay attention to. Where is the science here????
Deliberately mislabeling a death that wasn’t caused by COVID as a COVID death shall be subject to criminal prosecution and a minimum sentence of 10 years in prison.
Halt the use of remdesivir for hospitalized patients. It doesn’t work and it is basically killing people.
Hospitals shall comply with patient requests for medication if there is a clear rationale for the request and a lack of any data showing that the medication is likely to cause more harm than benefit.
Medical free choice
Doctors shall comply with patient requests for FDA approved medications to be administered which are supported by scientific data unless there is a more compelling scientific basis to deny the request.
Hospitals who fire healthcare workers for speaking out (whistleblowers) shall be subject to a private right of action to recover 10 years of wages per incident.
Spreading misinformation about masking and COVID vaccines
Any doctor who tells a patient that the vaccines are “safe and effective” or that cloth or surgical masks can stop COVID shall be called to show the scientific proof of this and lacking such proof shall his license revoked for spreading medical misinformation that can cause patient harm.
Any person who is suspended by a social network for communicating truthful scientific data and opinions shall have a private right of action to recover statutory damages of $10,000 per day for ever day the person is suspended.
Any person whose social network post (text or video) is not false and misleading but is erroneously labelled false and misleading is entitled to sue the platform for $10,000 per day that the post is mislabeled or removed by the social network.
Criminal prosecution against FDA, CDC, and NIH leaders who are suppressing the science in favor of the narrative. I can assure you, these people are corrupt. It is obvious to anyone with a brain who looks objectively at the data (such as this brilliant article by Josh Guetzkow, Ph.D. Yet the CDC and FDA cannot find a single safety signal? Give me a break. Nobody in Congress is interested in pursuing.
Today, CDC employees like John Su at the CDC, don’t have to answer a single question from the public. Neither do the outside committee members. Instead of a public speaking portion, the public should have the right to ask question of people who are sitting on these committees or make invited presentations. Today we have nothing. None of these people have to answer a single question and even with a million dollar incentive will not sit down for an interview. I wonder what they are so afraid of?
That’s my list. Not exhaustive, but you get the idea. We need to stop treating this virus like it is radioactive. There are many safe protocols for treating COVID and once recovered, the patient is always better off than if they were vaccinated.
Treating COVID with early treatments of a cocktail of repurposed drugs is the right approach. Vaccination with an unsafe, leaky vaccine in the middle of a pandemic is a recipe for disaster. We need to get off this treadmill ASAP.