59 Comments
User's avatar
David A. Breslin's avatar

Exactly who is preventing access to the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)

Expand full comment
Fred Kittelmann's avatar

I don't understand how it's possible that the CDC has "crown jewel" data, and RFK is powerless to have it released.

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

How much simpler could it be? The data exists already. Who has autism and what vaccines did they recieve and when? Who isn't autistic and how many of them recieved vaccines? Who isn't vaccinated and what is the occurrence of autism. I guarantee it's not RR 11.

Expand full comment
Marc Hermans's avatar

Question: Is this recent report also flawed?

And if yes, why? (I am not qualified to assess it.)

https://zenodo.org/records/17451259

Expand full comment
Masaki Fujii's avatar

I read Nonia Pariente's paper.

This man's thinking is fundamentally based on the commonly held belief that "vaccines prevent infectious diseases."

He has not given the slightest thought to whether this premise is right or wrong; he has formed his thoughts from a state of brainwashing, so to speak.

At the very least, his thinking is not what you would call that of a scientist.

Expand full comment
RA's avatar

If these phony "medical professionals" cared about children being wrecked for life more than their personal money and careerism, this question would have been dealt with long ago.

Expand full comment
Nicholas Hundley, MS, RN, CNS's avatar

I’m saddened that in the Simpsonwood meeting (I read the AI analysis on the web link you shared), even in those few academics who expressed concern for the children only mentioned THEIR OWN progeny. As though the billions of other children aren’t important. Are we humans really this self-obsessed?

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

We must assume that just about any medical related input like journals, study papers, doctors, medical associations, medical schools, etc...have been ruined by big pharma influence and are no longer viable to any degree. That is as far as being independent and trustworthy. Anyway, it sure looks that way.

Expand full comment
Just_Henry's avatar

These so-called experts are idiots. Cancer, heart attacks, strokes greatly increased after 2021, experts are puzzled as to the cause but they are certain it’s not the covid shots🤪. Shut up!

Expand full comment
shaman54inPennsylvania's avatar

Brought to you and paid for by your friends at big pharma. End of story.

Expand full comment
John Day MD's avatar

Straight denial is a powerful first line defense against cognitive dissonance, and interruption in funding, until it is breached. Then cognitive dissonance must be dealth with in the real world, and funding is just gone...

Expand full comment
Ruth Williams's avatar

They can’t be serious LOL

Expand full comment
Barry's avatar

And their evidence is an admitted low to very low grade study but with clear linkage signals which has to be investigated.

Outrageous agenda they have. Their masters are.. big pharma?

Expand full comment
Hypernoia's avatar

Oh, c’mon, surely we can take their “word” on it, they’re TheScience™.

And as we know from history (recent as well as long term), TheScience™ NEVER lies to cover up their criminal profiteering and gross disregard for safety….

Expand full comment
David O'Halloran's avatar

Excellent as ever, thanks. Some very powerful, but hidden, world wide force clearly wants this truth suppressed. That was pretty clear 28 years ago with the hysterical mass press reaction to Wakefield Why? My guess is that that the "intelligence" spooks, who really run all our governments, badly want the established power to force drug us, at will. They justify this with vague talk about biological attack, but what they really want is an open door to more power for themselves and no power for us. What they have always wanted. Medical tyranny backed with AI, they think, is the smart way to achieve this. Covid 19 was a test run for the real new world order. This will never be admitted, of course, but the weird reaction to anybody who even wants to investigate and the shunning and censorship of those - like you - who dare even to talk about the subject proves it. Look forward soon to the criminalization of anti vaccine discussion and research as a "hate crime" against the alleged, all sanctified, "public good".

Expand full comment
mejbcart's avatar

it is HOPEless, the participants from those woods could be called 'The Simpsons'

Expand full comment