Discover more from Steve Kirsch's newsletter
The new rules of medicine
In case you missed the memo.
In case you missed the memo from the CDC that went out about the new rules of medicine, here’s a copy.
Date: January 20, 2021
From: Rochelle Walensky, Director of the CDC
Subject: New rule changes to both science and medicine in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Due to the unprecedented number of deaths due to COVID-19, the following changes to science and medicine shall apply until further notice. It’s for the greater good:
Doctors should always follow the guidance of the CDC and NIH, even when it is wrong.
Any doctor who contradicts what the CDC or NIH say shall have their license to practice medicine revoked.
The CDC, FDA, and NIH are always right. So is the IDSA. However, in the event of a disagreement, the CDC always wins.
Unless you are an infectious disease specialist, your opinion on infectious diseases does not matter because you are not qualified to render an opinion.
All the vaccines are safe and effective. We aren’t making any all-cause mortality or morbidity available because they are both strongly negative. Very few people are even smart or aware enough to ask for the actual mortality/morbidity data. If they ask to see this data, or ask “why isn’t this data available,” you need to quickly end the conversation, e.g., “Oh, I have to go.” Or try gaslighting them telling them that they aren’t an infectious disease expert and that you should stay in your lane.
If a vaccinated person dies, accidentally misclassify it as unvaccinated COVID death. You get higher reimbursement and we keep the panic going. Win-win.
Efficacy data is now no longer needed to have FDA approval on a vaccine. Sure, Vinay Prasad complained loudly about this absurdity, but nobody else even noticed. This makes it much easier for Pfizer.
When we give your vaccine full FDA approval, there is no need to actually make it available. If you did that, you’d lose liability protection. So if you keep the authorized drug off the market, we don’t have to revoke your EUA! The courts even uphold this unscrupulous behavior!
If you are 12 or over, we’re passing laws so you can get vaxxed even when your parent objects. After all, the vaccines are perfectly safe.
Everyone should help ensure that deaths and adverse events are never associated with the vaccine. You are doing a great job so far. In particular, doctors at hospitals shouldn’t report any adverse events or deaths to VAERS, pharmacies who give the vaccine to the elderly should never ask for their Medicare numbers (since that would add it to their record), coroners, medical examiners, and embalmers should never ask for the COVID vaccine status of the dead, the COVID vaccine status should never be listed on their death certificate, and the mainstream media should never talk about when the person who died unexpectedly was vaccinated. All of these measures go a long way to ensuring that nobody finds out how dangerous the vaccines really are. Your model here is Dr. Nath at the NIH. He’s seen dozens of vaccine injured patients where multiple adverse events all started right after the vaccine. He publicly proclaims there is no link between the vaccine and the injuries even though there is no other explanation. This is exemplary behavior that allows him to keep his medical license and his job.
Ivermectin doesn’t work. There will always be “insufficient evidence” to recommend it, no matter how much evidence there is.
Peer-reviewed published systematic reviews and meta-analyses are now considered to be “insufficient evidence” even if there are multiple ones (like there are for ivermectin).
Early treatments for COVID using cheap repurposed drugs don’t work, no matter what the evidence says. The fact that George Fareed and Brian Tyson were able to treat 10,000 COVID patients without a single death was just due to good luck.
If you see something that contradicts the narrative, don’t say anything. This is known as the “See something, say nothing” policy. This is particularly important for doctors who are seeing massive numbers of deaths from the vaccine and from school nurses who are seeing large number of myocarditis cases. In all cases, you don’t want to speak out because we assure you that you are the only one seeing ridiculously high safety signals and if you speak out, you’ll just create “vaccine hesitancy.” Besides, the press won’t cover it since they don’t want to alarm the public. For example, at Monte Vista Christian School, they have 4 myocarditis cases in fewer than 400 boys. They are saying nothing publicly about this.
The vaccines don’t work, but just tell people who get COVID after being vaccinated that it would have been so much worse if they weren’t vaccinated. This works every time. Nobody questions you how you know it.
There are new variants now against which the vaccines don’t work at all. Doesn’t matter. Tell people to get vaccinated because it will reduce the chance of hospitalization and death, even though it won’t. They won’t know you are lying and it will make them feel better knowing they are protected. Remember, whatever the variant is, the current COVID vaccine is always the solution, never early treatment.
Nobody should analyze what is in the vaccine vials. There is simply no reason to do this. It’s a waste of time. Don’t you trust us?
While vaccine mandates have been ruled unconstitutional in Italy and India, it doesn’t apply in the US. There is nothing unconstitutional about mandating a vaccine that has killed over 500,000 Americans.
The UK government data shows the vaccine kill more people than they save so the all-cause mortality goes up. Don’t let this fact get in the way of recommending the vaccine. This isn’t about science or patient outcomes. It’s about compliance.
For the elderly, there is no all-cause mortality data showing a benefit, but who needs data? Just recommend it. We’ll get the data later, trust us. OK, well maybe we’ll get the data later. But data doesn’t matter which is why we aren’t even collecting it. Why bother? After all, nobody is asking for it except one guy and we had MIT thoroughly gaslight him.
Medical journals are prohibited from publishing papers that go against the narrative. Sometime, mistakes happen, and a counter-narrative paper gets published like the Rose-McCullough paper on myocarditis which had a very incriminating graphic. We had the publisher of the journal pull the paper. Here’s the original. See the graph on page 18? Nobody should see that so we had the paper pulled. We’ve been telling people it’s “a slightly elevated risk” that you’ll get myocarditis from the COVID vaccines. This paper makes us look like we lied to people. So the paper has to be suppressed.
“Misinformation” is defined any information that contradicts the current mainstream narrative, even if it is true.
“Misinformation spreader” is defined as someone who spreads misinformation. Because it is not possible to debate without exposing the truth, these people must be censored.
“State of Emergency” is defined to be anytime that there are more than 20 deaths per year from COVID.
You are not allowed to spread “misinformation” online anymore. If you do, we’ll take away your license to practice medicine. You are also not allowed to make comments that are not in your area of expertise. So if you actually find excess deaths in VAERS, shut up about it and stay in your lane. The UK is in the process of making this standard medical practice as well.
Never agree to debate any “misinformation spreaders;” they are evil people. In particular, if Steve Kirsch contacts you for a scientific debate, ignore it no matter how much he is offering. It won’t end well. Our collective reputations are worth more than any money he is offering. If the truth gets out, we are all screwed for decades.
The “misinformation spreaders” have a list of questions they want us to answer. They promise that if we do that, they’ll stop spreading misinformation. We can’t answer any of those questions, so it’s important that we have a good excuse to give people for declining to answer their questions. Just tell people that the questions are easy to answer but you are working on “more important things.” They will never ask you for details.
Expert opinion, formerly the lowest level of evidence, is now at the top of evidence-based medicine if and only if the experts are from a government agency like the CDC.
You don’t need any clinical evidence to prescribe a drug or vaccine if the CDC says it is safe. As NEJM Editor Eric Rubin has said, “We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.”
Always trust the drug companies and their clinical trials, even when there is clear fraud. Also, if the drug company claims that the deaths weren’t related to the drug, no evidence is required. The FDA should never ask if the proper tests were done during the autopsy. Heck, who needs an autopsy? Those are old fashioned.
There is no stopping condition for COVID vaccines. Doesn’t matter how many people are killed by the vaccine itself. It only matters how many COVID lives we may theoretically save.
Nobody is allowed to publish any risk-benefit analyses of the vaccines. That would just scare the public and create vaccine hesitancy which would not be good.
Risk benefit analyses should not look at all-cause mortality anymore. That is a distraction. What’s important is only the relative risk reduction, RRR.
Fraud never happens in clinical trials run by big pharma, even when it does.
Whistleblowers will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
If you work for the mainstream media, never acknowledge that there are differing opinions to the government narrative.
When science and politics disagree, politics always wins.
Any scientist who disobeys these rules will have their NIH funding cut off. Forever.
Vaccines only need to be tested for a few months to be deemed safe.
Make sure Medicare patients do NOT show need to show their Medicare card when getting a vaccine. You don’t want it tied it to their Medicare record. That way, anyone looking at the Medicare records is going to see the vaccinated as the unvaccinated and there won’t be a difference between the two groups and we can show everyone the numbers and say, “See? No difference between the groups!” This is going to fool most people.
If it looks like the vaccine works, always make sure everyone in the placebo group gets the vaccine when the trial is over. Who needs a comparison group after 6 months? After all, we really don’t want to let people find out that the drug was only marginally effective with the initial variant and not effective for later variants. So getting rid of the control group is fine. They will trust us.
When doing a vaccine study, if people get really sick from the drug, just kick them out of the trial. You no longer have to count them as an adverse event. This just experimental error. You don’t want this data to pollute the effectiveness data.
The unvaccinated are a clear danger to public health of the vaccinated. There is even a thoroughly discredited study by our friend Professor Fisman showing this. You are to avoid reading any of the many articles and comments that discredit the Fisman study.
There is no need to wait for data on pregnant women and birth rates before recommending a new vaccine for pregnant women.
Kids are at severe risk for COVID, even when they aren’t. This is especially true for young kids. It’s about keeping them safe from dying from COVID, even if there are no deaths in healthy kids from COVID. So what if the risk benefit analysis shows the vaccines will kill 100 kids for every kid we might save? The focus is solely on saving kids from dying from COVID. If a child dies from a cardiac, clotting, or brain hemorrhage issue from the vaccine, those don’t count. Those are just anecdotes.
If you aren’t sure about what you are allowed to say, try posting it on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, or YouTube. If you get censored, stop saying it.
A doctor’s first duty is to keep his/her job, not to serve patients.
Autopsies are discouraged. The vaccine is safe so there is no reason to check to see if this caused the death.
For anything unusual (like dramatic drops in live births, increase in stillbirths, excess cardiac ambulance calls, etc), just assure the public that the CDC is looking into it.
There are no vaccine injured. These people are just under a lot of stress or are faking their symptoms to try to get money. Look, if there were any vaccine injuries, Dr. Nath at the NIH would be the very first first to publicly admit it. Check out this article on Dr. Nath. See? No injuries. He couldn’t find a link!
Never measure D-dimer or troponin levels after the COVID vaccine. Why would you want to do that? It’s a waste of time.
Informed consent means you were informed that you were going to be vaccinated and consented to it willingly. There is no need to reveal all the side-effects and risk of death; that would just scare people.
If you work in a hospital, always follow what the hospital says. You will be compensated on your ability to follow hospital protocol, no matter how many of your patients die unnecessarily. The hospital administrators know best.
You need to be fully vaccinated with the latest booster. If you are, there is no need to take a COVID test, even if you are feeling sick. Patient safety is #1.
When one of your patients dies from a vaccine injury, never ever mention the vaccine. It’s just an “unexpected death.”
People who think the vaccines are unsafe are simply mentally unfit. Avoid them or suggest psychiatric help.
If a patient says they are vaccine injured, tell them you can’t treat them.
If anyone asks about adverse vaccine reactions say that there is no proof of causation. So for example, just because the blindness happened right after the jab for lots of people doesn’t mean that the jab caused the blindness. It’s just a “coincidence.” Similarly, when formerly healthy people suffer from 12 or more adverse events that are elevated in VAERS for the COVID vaccines right after taking a shot, that’s just a “really unfortunate coincidence.” It is never caused by the vaccine. For there to be causality, you’d have to have an admission from the CDC first. There can’t be any causality without that.
If anyone points out the huge spike in death reports in VAERS, tell them VAERS is voluntary reporting and thus unreliable and walk away as quickly as you can.
Online newspapers that report what is really going on like The Epoch Times and The Daily Expose should be censored and deplatformed. Payment companies like Stripe and PayPal should refuse to do business with them.
Do not watch this video where Tucker Carlson points out “Would you allow people who disagree with you to talk? If you wouldn’t, you are a tyrant.” That is misinformation. The new rules are clear: Do not allow anyone who disagrees with you to talk. Also, you certainly don’t want to give them a platform to spread their views either. That’s why debates must be avoided.
Never log adverse reactions or deaths on VAERS. They can’t be vaccine related so all you are doing is wasting everyone’s time and alarming people. It also gives misinformation spreaders material to use.
If you work at the CDC and find data that goes against the narrative, don’t let anyone know about it. This is important because negative data can be used by misinformation spreaders to create vaccine hesitancy.
If a patient dies with COVID, it’s a COVID death, even if COVID didn’t cause the death.
Always wear a mask when seeing patients. You want everyone to know you follow “best practices.”
Masks work. Even when there is no science to back it up. They work because we say it works. We don’t need science.
The COVID vaccines shall be mandated even when there is no scientific proof that mandates have a societal all-cause mortality benefit. Who needs data when you have a decision from Tony Fauci? If you have all-cause mortality data that shows that people who got the vaccine died at a higher rate than the unvaccinated, you are required to hide it. The medical journals won’t publish it anyway.
Do not include any COVID vaccination date on the death record. This way, nobody will find out that vaccinated people are dying at a higher rate than the unvaccinated. Clever, isn’t it?
Successful comedians who attempt to use humor to break the mass formation such as J.P. Sears, must be deplatformed. Humor is one of the most successful ways to reach people and change their minds and break the mass formation. These comedians should be identified and censored and their channels labelled as “violating our community standards.”
Do not listen to UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad. He wrote an op-ed in April 2020 entitled “Scientists who express different views on Covid-19 should be heard, not demonized.” Prasad is wrong. Do the opposite. Demonize them and make sure they are not allowed to be heard. In particular, try to pass laws like they are doing in California, to ensure that doctors cannot speak out against the narrative. That is what any civilized society does: controls the narrative and suppresses free speech.
We will provide huge monetary incentives to hospitals and nursing homes for categorizing deaths as COVID-19 deaths, even if the patient didn’t die from COVID-19. This keeps the public in fear which we need for them to be willing to follow any ridiculous directives we order such as mandatory vaccination, facecoverings, social distancing, and lockdowns (which have never been proven to work, but they don’t know that).
Be sure to stay 6 feet away from people at all times. To be honest, there is no science behind the 6 foot rule since the virus is transmitted as an aerosol which can stay in the air for hours and days. If anyone asks for the science behind the 6 foot rule, just look at them like they are stupid, shake your head, and walk away. Never admit there is no science behind this rule or we’ll all look really stupid.
It is safe to remove your mask while sitting down and eating because everyone knows you can’t get COVID while you are eating. OK, that really isn’t true but the thing is if we required masking at restaurants, there would be too much public outrage, so we’ve adjusted the rules to avoid this.
People are not considered vaccinated until 2 weeks after their last shot. So if they die after the shot, but before the two weeks, the death must be counted as an “unvaccinated death.”
In the monthly CDC tracking of deaths, the reason there is no column for deaths due to the COVID-19 vaccine because these vaccines are safe.
There shall be no objections to these new rules from anyone, especially scientific leaders. In particular, no Dean of Science in the US, including MIT Dean of Science Nergis Mavalvala, shall speak out about the changes except to endorse them.
Those are the new rules. You are required to follow them. If you don’t like them, I suggest you find a new profession. Now.
Please share this widely as it’s important that everyone knows the new rules and follows them. It’s for the greater good. Trust us.