54/55 subgroup analyses show harm. It’s not random. It follows a perfect dose-response gradient (antigens/aluminum). Critics have all failed to explain how this is consistent with a safe vaccine.
Dear Lord. The article literally admits it's not estimating mortality risk because it contains no survivors.
That's like claiming seatbelts increase mortality after studying only people who died in car crashes. Without everyone who survived, you can't estimate the risk of dying. No amount of Bradford Hill checklists or "54 out of 55" changes that basic epidemiology.
Bravo Steve! Thanks for highlighting and clarifying the importance and soundness of this paper.
It’s really clear to me that everyone who continues to develop, market, approve, or administer vaccines to defenseless infants and children, and on our young military recuits, should be ashamed of their role in the deliberate harm.
The reinstatement of the mandate for the (mrna?) flu vaccine four our military are also truly tragic.
I believe that the Amish have always been very sceptical about child vaccination. Their uptake of vaccinating their children is way below that of the general population . How do they fare on this question? Are they not a great control group?
Everyone must remember that all the regulatory gate keepers intentional create "confusion" on how each define "causality".
It by design prevents the relative ease of determining causal relationship and turns it into a puzzle wrapped in a big pharma funded enigma.
For example, here are the WHO assclowns...
"An inherent problem in pharmacovigilance is that most case reports concern suspected adverse drug reactions. Adverse reactions are rarely specific for the drug, diagnostic tests are usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically justified. In practice few adverse reactions are ‘certain’ or ‘unlikely’;
most are somewhere in between these extremes, i.e. ‘possible’ or ‘probable’. In an attempt to solve
this problem many systems have been developed for a structured and harmonised assessment of causality (1). None of these systems, however, have been shown to produce a precise and reliable quantitative estimation of relationship likelihood. Nevertheless, causality assessment has become a common routine procedure in pharmacovigilance. "
Money-creating Industries are worshipped by the leaders who derive benefits from them in the government. They are given all kinds of perks to keep the money flowing; like NO Liability for injuries or deaths in the vaccine industry.
No vaccine has the ability to prevent disease contrary to the claims of the vaccine industry, which say vaccines are Safe & Effective. Any one who says that has no knowledge of how the human body works. Medical schools don't consider the study of nutrition essential, when 95% of illness is created by what enters the bloodstream. The wrong 'good' food can break down the internal organs, so one can only imagine what the toxic ingredients in drugs and vaccines will do to the organs, glands and cells in the body. The human bloodstream was designed to carry nutrients from natural food to the organs, glands and cells in order to provide nourishment, which would create energy and health. The results of the Medical and Food Industries influence during the last 75 years has lowered Americans scholastically, mentally, physically and spiritually. We have gone from #1 in World Health to 47th place. Americans spend more on medicine and treatments than any other country with the worst results.. Unbekoming's substack today 7-17-26 is a must read.. It covers very valuable information about vaccines.
And as we all know, showing how dangerous vaccines are does not stop vaccination because somehow these studies are not supported by mainstream medical organizations or our alphabet agencies, so far. They find any and every way to discredit this proof. The Henry Ford study certainly proved vaxxed kids are much more unhealthy than unvaxed kids but still nothing is done or talked about mainstream. I still believe until parents stop vaccinating their kids, nothing will change. They need to wake up. They listen to their pediatricians who are brainwashed and sometimes paid off to by big pharma and insurance companies . So it’s mass deception all around. I wonder if drs, parents or any medical professionals know the actual ingredients in the jabs they recommend for children? Why not? I think until full informed consent is given no one should received any vaccines!
I do not vaccinate my pets after their one year shots. Just do titers afterwards. I had a great dog die after a rabies shot many years ago as a senior, before I understood how dangerous they are. He was perfectly healthy prior. Learned the hard way. I think the CDC has vaccine ingredients on their website. I know they have the Pfizer/Moderna C-jab ingredients there. I investigated each one and that was why I refrained from getting any. But my husband took the Pfizer shots and they killed him. I am still infuriated 3 years later. There’s one ingredient that the manufacturer states right on their website not for human or vet use, just for research. Never studied for safety. I guess everyone that took them is just a research rat. That crap was in both the Pfizer and Moderna C-jabs. Geez.🙄
I know the ingredients but I can’t seem to find a good resource to post ingredients, that people will think is correct and verifiable.
Do you know of any?
For me, injecting alcohol and formaldehyde into a Day old infant was in itself, a hard NO from me. Factor in the animal cells like monkey/canine, etc? 🤢
There are heavy metals.
Then factor in polysorbates which can breach the Blood rain Barrier and usher in the toxins and heavy metals with it. There are canine/feline, equine and porcine (porky pig) cells. The most nauseating and egregious ingredients are the aborted human fetal cells— of BOTH sexes!
What could go wrong??
Skyrocketing cases of gender confusion among kids?
Skyrocketing cases of food allergies, eggs/peanuts/animal dander? Skyrocketing rates of autoimmune issues???
Perhaps it’s because we use all this crap in the making of vaccines. Pet dander allergies that are supposedly “hereditary” yet no one in the family tree has them? Peanut or egg allergies —
also “inherent” but no one recalls an ancestor with the issue?
Autoimmune… If there are tiny fragments of fetal cells— the human BODY, and we put them into a vaccine that tells the baby’s BODY to mount a defense against ____ measles— or whatever, ARE WE NOT ALSO telling the baby’s BODY to mount a defense against (wait for it…) the BODY???
• Formaldehyde: It's used during manufacturing to inactivate viruses or toxins, and only trace residual amounts may remain in some vaccines. The human body naturally contains and produces much more formaldehyde through normal metabolism than is present in a vaccine dose.
• Alcohol: Not all vaccines contain alcohol, and when present it's used in tiny amounts as a stabilizer or preservative—not at toxic levels.
• "Monkey, canine, feline, equine and porcine cells": Some vaccines are produced using established cell lines or animal-derived materials during manufacturing. That does not mean you're injecting whole animal cells. The final products are highly purified, and any residual DNA or proteins are present, if at all, in minute amounts.
• Fetal cell lines: A few vaccines are manufactured using laboratory cell lines originally derived decades ago from two elective abortions performed in the 1960s. They do not contain fetal tissue, and there are no new abortions required to maintain those cell lines.
• Polysorbate 80: There is no good evidence that the tiny amounts used in vaccines "open the blood-brain barrier" in people or carry toxins into the brain.
• Food allergies, pet allergies, autoimmune disease, gender confusion: These are hypotheses without convincing evidence. Simply naming an ingredient doesn't establish that it causes those conditions.
The common theme here is confusing biological plausibility with proof of causation. If someone claims an ingredient causes autoimmune disease, food allergies, or gender dysphoria, they need evidence demonstrating that relationship—not just a mechanism they think sounds plausible.
Steve, that infuriates me when I talk about this to parents who have sick kids. They respond “at their kids wellness visit they had to get their shots”. Crazy! There’s no “had to”! It’s not “a wellness visit”, it’s a poison your child visit so that the pediatrician can but a new car. What’s wrong with parents?
Good article! It becomes more evident by the day that vaccines are a control and propaganda mechanism. Government actions during the Covid operation made that clear.
It is understandable why censorship is necessary. If the medical/pharma industry even began to acknowledge the harms done by vaccines, many of their careers would be over and lawyers would begin looking for any way they could to sue those administering these toxic injections. They are trapped by their past actions and have no choice but to censor and deny everything.
I suggest the following - The government should enact a new law that says:
- Freedom from liability for vaccine injuries will continue to apply for injections given up to [pick a date]. No liability for past injections. So, the past is forgiven.
- But after [date], healthcare providers will be liable for injuries from new injections.
I suspect that many (most?) healthcare providers would quietly accept the pardon and stop giving vaccines.
"US Childhood Vaccines Are Increasing Infant Mortality."
Yes, just like the devils minions have designed them to do. I have not forgotten the intentional democide from the plandemic. Some call this population control, but I believe the intent is the complete annihilation of the human race.
I think we also have to acknowledge that during Covid any doctor that said or tried something that was outside the establishment narrative was severely ostracized. If doctors were freer to voice their opinions, openly, they might be more willing to speak up. It seems to me that "curiosity" is severely lacking in the vaccination tent.
One side effect that I am really enjoying about your use of AI summaries is that it pits the AI hype machine against the big pharma propaganda machine. Either AI is just random noise that only produces confirmation bias to increase user engagement or it is capable of doing sophisticated and proper data analysis, translating the results into common and accessible language and hoisting big pharma on their own high-tech petard.
Oh, I'm sure. Even Brave Search (search.brave.com) has one masquerading as some "freedom" or "private" AI. It is, from my experience, to the left of Gemini which is saying something. Whereas Gemini may think the Founding Fathers were black, I wouldn't be surprised if Leo (Brave's AI) doesn't think they were trans hahaha
As long as they can manipulate the gate keepers at the FDA and etc, nothing will change. It is obvious that immature immune systems being violated will have tragic results. Our legislative members in DC fear the wrath of Big Pharma more than the wrath of their constituents. Time for term limits and no political campaigning until 90 cays before election.
"Causality assessment is required for clinical investigation cases.
All cases judged by either the reporting health care professional or the sponsor as having a reasonable suspected causal relationshipto the medicinal product qualify as ADRs. For purposes of reporting, adverse event reports associated with marketed drugs (spontaneous reports) usually imply causality. Many terms and scales are in use to describe the degree of
causality (attributability) between a medicinal product and an event, such as certainly, definitely, probably, possibly or likely related or not related. Phrases such as "plausible relationship," "suspected causality," or "causal relationship cannot be ruled out" are also invoked to describe cause and effect.
☝️☝️☝️☝️However, there is
currently no standard international nomenclature. The expression
"reasonable causal relationship" is meant to convey in general that
there are facts (evidence) or arguments to suggest a causal
Dear Lord. The article literally admits it's not estimating mortality risk because it contains no survivors.
That's like claiming seatbelts increase mortality after studying only people who died in car crashes. Without everyone who survived, you can't estimate the risk of dying. No amount of Bradford Hill checklists or "54 out of 55" changes that basic epidemiology.
Bravo Steve! Thanks for highlighting and clarifying the importance and soundness of this paper.
It’s really clear to me that everyone who continues to develop, market, approve, or administer vaccines to defenseless infants and children, and on our young military recuits, should be ashamed of their role in the deliberate harm.
The reinstatement of the mandate for the (mrna?) flu vaccine four our military are also truly tragic.
So, there is hidden SRA and then open SRA through jab rituals.
I believe that the Amish have always been very sceptical about child vaccination. Their uptake of vaccinating their children is way below that of the general population . How do they fare on this question? Are they not a great control group?
The Amish are NOT a control group, they are a completely different population with a different lifestyle.
don't have their data broken out
Everyone must remember that all the regulatory gate keepers intentional create "confusion" on how each define "causality".
It by design prevents the relative ease of determining causal relationship and turns it into a puzzle wrapped in a big pharma funded enigma.
For example, here are the WHO assclowns...
"An inherent problem in pharmacovigilance is that most case reports concern suspected adverse drug reactions. Adverse reactions are rarely specific for the drug, diagnostic tests are usually absent and a rechallenge is rarely ethically justified. In practice few adverse reactions are ‘certain’ or ‘unlikely’;
most are somewhere in between these extremes, i.e. ‘possible’ or ‘probable’. In an attempt to solve
this problem many systems have been developed for a structured and harmonised assessment of causality (1). None of these systems, however, have been shown to produce a precise and reliable quantitative estimation of relationship likelihood. Nevertheless, causality assessment has become a common routine procedure in pharmacovigilance. "
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/medicines/pharmacovigilance/whocausality-assessment.pdf
Money-creating Industries are worshipped by the leaders who derive benefits from them in the government. They are given all kinds of perks to keep the money flowing; like NO Liability for injuries or deaths in the vaccine industry.
No vaccine has the ability to prevent disease contrary to the claims of the vaccine industry, which say vaccines are Safe & Effective. Any one who says that has no knowledge of how the human body works. Medical schools don't consider the study of nutrition essential, when 95% of illness is created by what enters the bloodstream. The wrong 'good' food can break down the internal organs, so one can only imagine what the toxic ingredients in drugs and vaccines will do to the organs, glands and cells in the body. The human bloodstream was designed to carry nutrients from natural food to the organs, glands and cells in order to provide nourishment, which would create energy and health. The results of the Medical and Food Industries influence during the last 75 years has lowered Americans scholastically, mentally, physically and spiritually. We have gone from #1 in World Health to 47th place. Americans spend more on medicine and treatments than any other country with the worst results.. Unbekoming's substack today 7-17-26 is a must read.. It covers very valuable information about vaccines.
good work Steve
And as we all know, showing how dangerous vaccines are does not stop vaccination because somehow these studies are not supported by mainstream medical organizations or our alphabet agencies, so far. They find any and every way to discredit this proof. The Henry Ford study certainly proved vaxxed kids are much more unhealthy than unvaxed kids but still nothing is done or talked about mainstream. I still believe until parents stop vaccinating their kids, nothing will change. They need to wake up. They listen to their pediatricians who are brainwashed and sometimes paid off to by big pharma and insurance companies . So it’s mass deception all around. I wonder if drs, parents or any medical professionals know the actual ingredients in the jabs they recommend for children? Why not? I think until full informed consent is given no one should received any vaccines!
I do not vaccinate my pets after their one year shots. Just do titers afterwards. I had a great dog die after a rabies shot many years ago as a senior, before I understood how dangerous they are. He was perfectly healthy prior. Learned the hard way. I think the CDC has vaccine ingredients on their website. I know they have the Pfizer/Moderna C-jab ingredients there. I investigated each one and that was why I refrained from getting any. But my husband took the Pfizer shots and they killed him. I am still infuriated 3 years later. There’s one ingredient that the manufacturer states right on their website not for human or vet use, just for research. Never studied for safety. I guess everyone that took them is just a research rat. That crap was in both the Pfizer and Moderna C-jabs. Geez.🙄
parents don't know the ingredients. even doctors are surprised!
No doctors are surprised. They understand them. you don't.
I know the ingredients but I can’t seem to find a good resource to post ingredients, that people will think is correct and verifiable.
Do you know of any?
For me, injecting alcohol and formaldehyde into a Day old infant was in itself, a hard NO from me. Factor in the animal cells like monkey/canine, etc? 🤢
There are heavy metals.
Then factor in polysorbates which can breach the Blood rain Barrier and usher in the toxins and heavy metals with it. There are canine/feline, equine and porcine (porky pig) cells. The most nauseating and egregious ingredients are the aborted human fetal cells— of BOTH sexes!
What could go wrong??
Skyrocketing cases of gender confusion among kids?
Skyrocketing cases of food allergies, eggs/peanuts/animal dander? Skyrocketing rates of autoimmune issues???
Perhaps it’s because we use all this crap in the making of vaccines. Pet dander allergies that are supposedly “hereditary” yet no one in the family tree has them? Peanut or egg allergies —
also “inherent” but no one recalls an ancestor with the issue?
Autoimmune… If there are tiny fragments of fetal cells— the human BODY, and we put them into a vaccine that tells the baby’s BODY to mount a defense against ____ measles— or whatever, ARE WE NOT ALSO telling the baby’s BODY to mount a defense against (wait for it…) the BODY???
Several of these claims are misleading.
• Formaldehyde: It's used during manufacturing to inactivate viruses or toxins, and only trace residual amounts may remain in some vaccines. The human body naturally contains and produces much more formaldehyde through normal metabolism than is present in a vaccine dose.
• Alcohol: Not all vaccines contain alcohol, and when present it's used in tiny amounts as a stabilizer or preservative—not at toxic levels.
• "Monkey, canine, feline, equine and porcine cells": Some vaccines are produced using established cell lines or animal-derived materials during manufacturing. That does not mean you're injecting whole animal cells. The final products are highly purified, and any residual DNA or proteins are present, if at all, in minute amounts.
• Fetal cell lines: A few vaccines are manufactured using laboratory cell lines originally derived decades ago from two elective abortions performed in the 1960s. They do not contain fetal tissue, and there are no new abortions required to maintain those cell lines.
• Polysorbate 80: There is no good evidence that the tiny amounts used in vaccines "open the blood-brain barrier" in people or carry toxins into the brain.
• Food allergies, pet allergies, autoimmune disease, gender confusion: These are hypotheses without convincing evidence. Simply naming an ingredient doesn't establish that it causes those conditions.
The common theme here is confusing biological plausibility with proof of causation. If someone claims an ingredient causes autoimmune disease, food allergies, or gender dysphoria, they need evidence demonstrating that relationship—not just a mechanism they think sounds plausible.
Steve, that infuriates me when I talk about this to parents who have sick kids. They respond “at their kids wellness visit they had to get their shots”. Crazy! There’s no “had to”! It’s not “a wellness visit”, it’s a poison your child visit so that the pediatrician can but a new car. What’s wrong with parents?
Good article! It becomes more evident by the day that vaccines are a control and propaganda mechanism. Government actions during the Covid operation made that clear.
It is understandable why censorship is necessary. If the medical/pharma industry even began to acknowledge the harms done by vaccines, many of their careers would be over and lawyers would begin looking for any way they could to sue those administering these toxic injections. They are trapped by their past actions and have no choice but to censor and deny everything.
I suggest the following - The government should enact a new law that says:
- Freedom from liability for vaccine injuries will continue to apply for injections given up to [pick a date]. No liability for past injections. So, the past is forgiven.
- But after [date], healthcare providers will be liable for injuries from new injections.
I suspect that many (most?) healthcare providers would quietly accept the pardon and stop giving vaccines.
i don't think so. the doctors are mostly brainwashed even after you show them they are wrong.
And greedy.
Do have any idea what the percentage of pediatricians who vax their own children is?
"US Childhood Vaccines Are Increasing Infant Mortality."
Yes, just like the devils minions have designed them to do. I have not forgotten the intentional democide from the plandemic. Some call this population control, but I believe the intent is the complete annihilation of the human race.
i don't think doctors are evil. they or simply being taught by their peers who were taught by their peers
I think we also have to acknowledge that during Covid any doctor that said or tried something that was outside the establishment narrative was severely ostracized. If doctors were freer to voice their opinions, openly, they might be more willing to speak up. It seems to me that "curiosity" is severely lacking in the vaccination tent.
One side effect that I am really enjoying about your use of AI summaries is that it pits the AI hype machine against the big pharma propaganda machine. Either AI is just random noise that only produces confirmation bias to increase user engagement or it is capable of doing sophisticated and proper data analysis, translating the results into common and accessible language and hoisting big pharma on their own high-tech petard.
depends on WHICH AI you use!
Oh, I'm sure. Even Brave Search (search.brave.com) has one masquerading as some "freedom" or "private" AI. It is, from my experience, to the left of Gemini which is saying something. Whereas Gemini may think the Founding Fathers were black, I wouldn't be surprised if Leo (Brave's AI) doesn't think they were trans hahaha
As long as they can manipulate the gate keepers at the FDA and etc, nothing will change. It is obvious that immature immune systems being violated will have tragic results. Our legislative members in DC fear the wrath of Big Pharma more than the wrath of their constituents. Time for term limits and no political campaigning until 90 cays before election.
Have always heard that autism is much more common in boys; is that just because the girls are more likely to DIE and thus, never develop autism? 😨
no, I don't think so. deaths are a tiny fraction.
Well done!
Steve, 🫵👊💪💯💯💯💯💯
"Causality assessment is required for clinical investigation cases.
All cases judged by either the reporting health care professional or the sponsor as having a reasonable suspected causal relationshipto the medicinal product qualify as ADRs. For purposes of reporting, adverse event reports associated with marketed drugs (spontaneous reports) usually imply causality. Many terms and scales are in use to describe the degree of
causality (attributability) between a medicinal product and an event, such as certainly, definitely, probably, possibly or likely related or not related. Phrases such as "plausible relationship," "suspected causality," or "causal relationship cannot be ruled out" are also invoked to describe cause and effect.
☝️☝️☝️☝️However, there is
currently no standard international nomenclature. The expression
"reasonable causal relationship" is meant to convey in general that
there are facts (evidence) or arguments to suggest a causal
relationship." - FDA
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.fda.gov/media/71188