Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Share this post

The most damaging paper of the pandemic was published in The Lancet for <24 hours before they censored it

kirschsubstack.com

Discover more from Steve Kirsch's newsletter

I write about COVID mitigation policies, vaccines, neurological diseases and conditions, corruption, censorship, and early treatments. The data shows that vaccines are ruining the health of Americans and driving the epidemic in neurological conditions.
Over 234,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

The most damaging paper of the pandemic was published in The Lancet for <24 hours before they censored it

The COVID vaccines have killed massive numbers of people and the government covered it up. The paper, published as a pre-print, shows 74% of deaths post-vax due to the vax.

Steve Kirsch
Jul 5, 2023
1,359
Share this post

The most damaging paper of the pandemic was published in The Lancet for <24 hours before they censored it

kirschsubstack.com
536
Share

Head on over to Peter McCullough’s Substack for the details and please consider subscribing to his Substack. He’s terrific, a great friend, a great scientist, and a man of great courage.

This is a pre-print so not yet peer-reviewed.

Here is the:

  1. Abstract

  2. Paper (hosted on the Daily Skeptic)

  3. Daily Skeptic rticle about the removal in <24 hours after being posted

The paper had about 30,000 views in 24 hours (about 20 views per minute) before The Lancet removed the paper saying: “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

What is astonishing to me is that they were able to determine that so quickly!!!

Normally, peer review takes months. The Lancet has shown that errors meriting removal can be determined in just 24 hours.

But we don’t have a clue what the errors were because they didn’t tell us and they didn’t tell the authors either. They didn’t even give the authors a chance to respond!!!

They basically unilaterally decided the paper’s conclusion wasn’t supported by the methods and they weren’t interested in any response from the authors before taking action.

The paper shows 74% of deaths post-vax could be attributed to the vaccine being a cause of death. And most of the deaths happened within 1 week of vaccination.

The results are strongly consistent with the Schwab paper where 71% of the deaths appeared to be consistent with a vaccine death:

They basically were looking for the “cleanest” proof of death, but it’s likely that all 71% of the cases (25 out of 35) died from the vaccine, it’s just harder to “prove” that.

The question we all should be asking is why are we first hearing about these cases now? How could all of the CDC’s analyses show no relation to the vaccine? And why aren’t we allowed to see the CDC’s analyses?

Share

1,359
Share this post

The most damaging paper of the pandemic was published in The Lancet for <24 hours before they censored it

kirschsubstack.com
536
Share
536 Comments
Share this discussion

The most damaging paper of the pandemic was published in The Lancet for <24 hours before they censored it

kirschsubstack.com
author
Steve Kirsch
Jul 5Pinned

Peter’s article has a link to the pre-print

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
142 replies
Jennifer Wright
Aug 11

Thanks for your commitment to medical truth Steve!!! As a health care professional trying to spread truth on many topics for years, I bow to your integrity & commitment!

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
534 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Steve Kirsch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing