While I am in your camp, you're being a bit too antagonistic. The science / facts / data are what matter. Emotionalizing the situation with "if you give a damn about the lives of the people of New Zealand.", will not win their participation. They are being asked to face the guillotine. Your readership likely needs no convincing. Getting …
While I am in your camp, you're being a bit too antagonistic. The science / facts / data are what matter. Emotionalizing the situation with "if you give a damn about the lives of the people of New Zealand.", will not win their participation. They are being asked to face the guillotine. Your readership likely needs no convincing. Getting professionals to admit they were and are wrong is a different challenge. I believe a more flies with honey thing. Perhaps demonstrating how the data indicates the "vaccines" have a negative risk/reward ratio. Please help us better understand your promotion of these injectable products in light of the data.
While I am in your camp, you're being a bit too antagonistic. The science / facts / data are what matter. Emotionalizing the situation with "if you give a damn about the lives of the people of New Zealand.", will not win their participation. They are being asked to face the guillotine. Your readership likely needs no convincing. Getting professionals to admit they were and are wrong is a different challenge. I believe a more flies with honey thing. Perhaps demonstrating how the data indicates the "vaccines" have a negative risk/reward ratio. Please help us better understand your promotion of these injectable products in light of the data.