202 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Can we please stop using the words vaccine/vaccination? It’s just playing into the propaganda that helps convince people to get the injection. Let’s please call it what it is: experimental injected gene therapy. So what if it takes longer to type or say that? Informed consent!

Expand full comment

The jabs seem more like chemotherapy.

Expand full comment

That’s because they are chemotherapy.

FAILED chemotherapy at that.

Expand full comment

I just call them the jabs.

Expand full comment

How about calling it something that everyone can agree with??? "An Emergency Use Authorized

Injection"

Expand full comment

SPOT ON! CONFIRMED BY DR. TENPENNY & MANY OTHER NOTABLE'S

Expand full comment

However, if we keep using that word for the clot shot it may help people to continue to question all injections and their safety.

Expand full comment

Very true.

Expand full comment

I call it a gene therapy transfection. Jonathon Couey has long pointed out that transfection was the common term used in the past, before they expanded "vaccine" to include transfections.

Expand full comment

Calling it a vaccine is quite appropriate because the other vaccines are not categorically different than this, they are just subtler deceptions. By calling it a vaccine, future generations will equate vaccine = harm and murder through medical deception, which will turn out to be accurate.

Expand full comment

Well, that’s one perspective. However, this mRNA gene therapy IS categorically different from past vaccines, and people have been used to trusting the vaccines which have been around for awhile. They used this trust as one form of coercion for these injections. If they would have been advertised honestly, and called what they actually are (experimental gene therapy injected into your body), a lot less folks would’ve been tricked into submission. We do seem to agree that none of them are safe.

Expand full comment