Steve's fact-based COVID-19 hub
Spotify recently created a "fact-based" COVID-19 hub that they direct their listeners to. However it is filled with misinformation. So I wrote my own. Let me know what you think.
Spotify made a press release about their new platform policies which prohibits any information which in their sole opinion may cause offline harm or poses a direct threat to public health. They refer people to their “fact-based” COVID-19 hub for accurate information.
I think their “fact-based” hub is filled with misinformation, so I decided to write my own simplified version that takes just a couple of minutes to read.
Here it is:
Early treatments using repurposed drugs in a proven protocol are the best way to treat COVID. Treating as soon as symptoms appear is key. Fareed and Tyson have now treated over 10,000 people infected with COVID without any deaths as long as the people arrived early in the disease. The NIH and CDC ignore these treatments. I recommend you choose an early treatment protocol where there have been at least 10,000 COVID patients treated early without a single death (such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol), and start it as soon as you have symptoms.
The evidence is clear that all of the current COVID vaccines available in the US today are both unsafe and ineffective. They are not suitable for anyone because they are more likely to kill you than to save you. If they don’t kill you, they may permanently damage your immune system or leave you permanently disabled. Avoid these at all costs. After 90 days, it appears that the vaccines have negative efficacy against Omicron, making you up to twice as likely to be infected. This is likely why case rates are so high in highly vaccinated countries. See Incriminating Evidence for details.
Cloth and surgical masks do not work. There have been just two randomized trials with masks and COVID (Denmark and Bangladesh) and they proved that surgical and cloth masks have no effect. Similarly, N95 masks do not work in practice either. The FAA rules basically require you to wear these masks on planes, mandating a medical intervention that is much more likely to make you sick and has no chance to protect you. See Incriminating Evidence for details.
If you require PPE that might protect you from COVID, consider a 3M respirator with a P100 filter. Even better is to use a PAPR with your respirator (with a P100 or P3 filter). See this article on masks and respirators for details. These products that protect you do not protect others. The FAA will not allow these devices on a plane.
Social distancing is not the right way to think about risk reduction. Think instead the 4 D’s: draft, distance, density, duration. Putting yourself in an unventilated small room at close distance to a source for a long duration will maximize your exposure. The 6 foot rule for standing in line is nonsensical since as soon as you enter the airspace of the person in front of you, you will be breathing the virus from people who were standing in that spot hours (to days) ago (depending on the ventilation in the area). There is absolutely nothing magical about 6 feet.
Mitigation strategies such as testing, masking, isolation, and vaccination are largely ineffective. See this article for a convincing example.
The best way to treat COVID is to do the opposite of what the CDC and FDA advises. So when they tell you to mask up, get boosted, avoid all repurposed drugs and supplements (including ivermectin, HCQ, fluvoxamine, vitamin D, zinc, aspirin, budesonide, etc), take paxlovid, molnupiravir, and remdesivir, you know what to do.
There is only significant spread if you have symptoms. For example, in a study in China, they looked at 1,174 close contacts of these asymptomatic individuals and could not find ONE CASE of a person getting COVID from the asymptomatic people. Therefore, testing asymptomatic people is unnecessary because it is a lot of effort for near 0 gain.
Omicron is very mild compared to Delta. After you recover from an Omicron infection, data shows you will be protected from Delta as well.
As of December 3, 2021, Omicron had spread to 38 countries, but the WHO couldn’t find anyone who died from Omicron. How is this a national emergency?
People who get the virus and recover are always better off than a vaccinated patient. Unlike vaccinated people, if a naturally infected patient is ever re-infected, they cannot transmit the virus to others (as far as we know so far).
Censorship of COVID advice by social media (in particular the hazards of the vaccines and the effectiveness of early treatment protocols) has cost hundreds of thousands of lives.
None of the health authorities issuing mandates and directives are willing to participate in a recorded scientific discussion with the so-called “misinformation spreaders” such as Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, Robert Kennedy, … Our authorities are afraid of the truth.
The CDC, FDA, and NIH are all corrupt agencies that have looked the other way at safety signals. There are over 1M adverse events in VAERS and these represent over 40M adverse events in the real world. This is unprecedented, yet the CDC isn’t able to find a safety signal other than a “slightly elevated” risk of myocarditis. Attempts to bring the VAERS data to their attention is futile. They won’t even do a proper calculation of the underreporting factor which is required to do a proper risk-benefit analysis. They ignore the DMED data entirely.
Compare my fact-based COVID-19 hub to Spotify’s and let me know which one you like better.
Also stay away from the hospitals.😭
Someone tried to counter Steve's points with a series of arguments that amounted to, "not true and here is one piece of weak evidence that says you are wrong." Further, he takes Steve to task for being a computer scientist, not a reliable source "such as a physician actively seeing COVID Patients." Well Sir, I am that physician and everything you said is ignorant nonsense. I am an ER Doc, I worked in a Research Company that made vaccines for 15 years and I have a Master's Degree in Public Health. Any intelligent person who understands statistics can read the papers and understand the meaning of the data. Steve did just that. Any treatment has risks and benefits. The benefits must outway the risks. I grant that this genetic therapy (it is not a vaccine) had benefit in a select highly vulnerable (older) population for a limited period for the initial forms of the virus. In every other group, the mRNA jab causes much more harm that benefit (please read about absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat and number needed to harm). The nature of the adverse events and the population in which they occur suggests that the toxicity is part of the mechanism of the therapy; in terms you can understand, the wide distribution in the body of a gene product known to cause inflammation and clotting will affect some individuals more than others. Some will clear the protein without harm, others will have a wide variety of inflammatory, autoimmune and clotting disorders - EXACTLY what we are seeing. Case reports and autopsies confirm that this gene therapy is injuring and killing hundreds of thousands with minimal benefit for a disease with a very low infection fatality rate for everyone but the most vulnerable. Every doctor-scientist who makes the effort to review the data will come to this conclusion. You ignore these truths at your peril.