63 Comments

What about the most important one: hiding that the official randomized controlled trial of the "lifesaving" Pfizer vaccine had 21 deaths in the vaccine group and 17 deaths in the placebo group, representing a 24% increase in deaths with the "lifesaving vaccine" compared to the placebo? This clinical trial is the "gold standard" study of the vaccine and the only one that is not subject to bias and scientific flaws. https://www.fda.gov/media/152176/download

Expand full comment

In the link provided above, go to Page 7 Line 7

Expand full comment

increase in endometrial cancer - can't be from jab. Right.

Expand full comment

Naturally acquired immunity only lasts 90 days. Zero data to back that up, CDC. We Chartruese need real facts. I didn't go through covid pneumonia without proper treatment just so you can kill me later with the heart stopping jab.

Expand full comment

Fauci made sure hospitals use Remdesivir as standard treatment for CV-19, even though Fauci KNOWS it's a failure!

Expand full comment
founding

The CDC changed its method of calculating safety signals on January 29, 2021 such that if a vaccine (in this case, "vaccine") injures and kills many times more people than a safe vaccine, no safety signal will be identified at all (see Mathew Crawford's Rounding the Earth Newsletter Substack from July 26, 2021: https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/defining-away-vaccine-safety-signals). By this time in January, enough deaths had already been reported to VAERS to warrant stopping the "vaccine" rollout altogether. Instead, this new 'safety system' allowed the CDC (and everyone else pushing the jab) to ignore the VAERS data and repeat the "vaccines are safe" mantra. This was not a mistake, but a deliberate maneuver to hide the injuries and deaths due to the jab. It's beyond corrupt, it's downright evil.

Expand full comment

More information about #6, please: One of the world’s top epidemiologists wrote a paper which points out cracks in the false narrative. It easily passes peer review and the publisher tells him it will be published. It is never published.

Expand full comment

Yes, that one's too vague. This epidemiologist should just put it on arxiv.org or somewhere. If the author is afraid of reprisal from being named publicly, or somehow prevented from publishing the work elsewhere, well... find another example.

Expand full comment

More information about item 7, please: One of the world’s top epidemiologists wrote a paper which points out cracks in the false narrative. It easily passes peer review and the publisher tells him it will be published. It is never published.

Expand full comment

It astonishes me that ppl continue to ignore such literature in what feels like the perfect crime being played out each day. Thank you for your tireless and continued effort to unravel.

Expand full comment

Recent study in Nature on covid vaccine results. Looks like they cause elevated H1Ac (making formerly healthy people pre-diabetic) and kidney damage, and these are still elevated 90 days post vaccine.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-021-00329-3

Expand full comment

That looks like a different vaccine than the mRNAs and J&J?

Expand full comment

Yes, its a chinese vaccine. The point is that we should be checking this for the mRNA and Jansen, it could very well be a problem.

Expand full comment

vaccines are the number one cause of coincidences

Expand full comment

favourite example (of the corruption of science); Covid19

Expand full comment

These short articles are great, thanks!

Expand full comment

Chlorine Dioxide safely treats Covid-19 and half the diseases known to man. I wrote some letters to the FDA about it: https://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=4084

Expand full comment

Interesting. I'm actually treating 2 of my cats with Chlorine Dioxide right now. The one was given a few months to live last summer and he's doing great right now.

Expand full comment

Hey Steve! Where is your reference for the paper never published written by one of the world's top epidemiologists? Thanks!

Expand full comment

It was clear from the get go, when they initially said (correctly) that masks don't do much for an airborne virus, then said they do something and everyone must wear them that this was more political than medical.

Expand full comment