No expertise required here. Just feed the paper and the supplement into an objective AI engine and the results are unambiguous. Retraction is ethically mandatory.
Not saying anything about the actual points being raised here, I think I am generally on your side of things, but I think using an AI to make your point for you is just extremely embarrassing and childish. You can make AI say whatever you want if you press it enough, so it agreeing with you is meaningless. Why not just take the reasonings and argumentation and write it yourself and take ownership of it?
here an OLD 2006 THESIS work supported by DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR UNIVERSITY, AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
title:
"IN VITRO TOXICITY OF ALUMINUM NANOPARTICLES IN RAT ALVEOLAR MACROPHAGES"
few quotes, telling a lot:
1. "Aluminum exposure has been seen to affect red blood cell numbers, oxygen uptake
ability, and clotting ability. Anemia as defined by the Merk Manual is the “Decrease in
the numbers of RBCs or hemoglobin content caused by blood loss, deficient
erythropoiesis, excessive hemolysis, or a combination of these changes” (Beers and
Berkow, 1999: 849). Aluminum causes decreased hemoglobin synthesis in bone marrow
cells and erythroleukemia cells resulting in microcrytic hypochromic anemia. Aluminum
also appears to affect the amount of intracellular iron available to hemoglobin (Yokel and
Golub, 1996: Ch 7, 137-140)."
2. "Other studies found that aluminum foundry workers and welders had alterations in eye hand coordination, memory, and sub clinical tremors (Toxicological Profile for Aluminum (update), 1999: 29-30)."
3. IMPORTANT ONE: "Alzheimer’s Disease as defined by Merck is “ A progressive, inexorable loss of
cognitive function associated with an excessive number of senile plaques in the cerebral
cortex and subcortical gray matter, which also contains beta-amyloid and neurofibrillary
tangles consisting of tau protein” (Beers and Berkow, 1999: 1395-1396). In 1994, Shin
determined that aluminum binds to these tau proteins and causes them to aggregate and to
not go through proteolysis." -> thus it is NOT the missfolded amyloids which are read cause of Alzheimers, but rather the metals which crosslink it and prevent digestive proteolysis.. Anyone wonders why NIH & Co. never give ANY grants to investigate ALUMINUM, but rather the amyloids which are natural in the brain?? Amyloids will never solve the problem, while the real cause will increase the DEATHS and stay untouched! Well at least we got this today: "New hope for Alzheimer’s: lithium supplement reverses memory loss in mice" (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02471-4)
It is all free to read and it is very complete study. One good study should be enough, and how many we got with still no answer?? Please search PubMed for 'aluminum toxicity', you get 9510 studies... How many more are needed in order to finally admit the truth??? Well academia needs money, and those who have it, DO NOT CARE ABOUT US, HUMANS.
Steve tonight on the CBS Evening News with Maurice DuBois; at 6:39 p.m. e.t. they did a segment on the fact that RFK Jr. announced that funding for mrna technology vaccines is being cut by the federal government. They proceeded to bring in their medical expert Dr. Jon Lapook. He interviewed other so-called experts who stated the covid vaccines were proven safe and effective and they went on to bash RFK Jr. for not presenting any data to support cutting funding for mrna vaccines. Can you help regarding this??? Everything you publish states how unsafe and ineffective the covid vaccines were/are. You're friends with RFK Jr.? These people need to be challenged. There is no one better to challenge them than you and your team of experts. How are we ever going to get the truth out to the American public?
Anyone seen the videos on being live monitored by defense for seed use of AI? People who use AI to discuss matters not aligned with official narrative or who challenge it are not viewed as users but as risk?
Another problem with the study design is that the total amount of aluminum injected before age two (only) is compared with diagnoses that are recorded from age two forward (only).
By tracking diagnoses from age two forward only, this design excludes all diagnoses (up and including death) before age two, including, for example, any that occur close-in-time to an aluminum injection administered before age two.
By excluding any aluminum injections after age two, this design also prevents discovery of correlations between lifetime cumulative exposure (when the cumulative exposure includes injections after age two) and the diagnosed conditions.
Christopher Exley (researcher on biological effects of aluminum, author of papers like the above in Nature) would be really good to consult about the absurd Danish “study”.
Now I can see the specific allegations being made. This is a detailed critique by Steve Kirsch claiming the study should be retracted. Let me evaluate these claims:
**Key Allegations:**
1. **Data manipulation**: Claims the supplement was revised, doubling neurodevelopmental events from ~2,200 to 5,200+ without transparent disclosure
1. **Suppression of significant findings**: Alleges that statistically significant associations between aluminum and neurodevelopmental outcomes were buried in the supplement while the main text claimed “no association”
1. **Inadequate follow-up period**: Only following children to age 5-8 when autism/ADHD are typically diagnosed later in Denmark (ages 7-12)
1. **Institutional conflicts**: SSI (the research institution) manufactures vaccines
**My Assessment:**
**Serious Allegations That Need Investigation:**
- If the supplement was indeed substantially revised without proper disclosure, that would be a major concern
- If statistically significant associations exist in the supplement but are contradicted in the main text, that’s problematic
**However, I’m Cautious About:**
- This critique comes from Steve Kirsch, who has a known anti-vaccine stance and has made previous claims that weren’t supported by mainstream scientific consensus
- The analysis is presented as “AI analysis” without clear methodology or independent verification
- Some methodological critiques (like follow-up periods) might be limitations rather than fatal flaws
**What Would Be Needed:**
- Independent verification of the supplement revision claims
- Statistical review by neutral epidemiologists
- Access to both versions of the supplement for comparison
- Peer review of the statistical methodology
The allegations are serious enough to warrant investigation, but I’d want to see independent verification from credible sources before concluding retraction is necessary. What’s your view on these specific claims?
Sir, why do you feel that claims, supported by data and logic, need also be supported by "mainstream scientific consensus"? "Mainstream science", and "consensus", these days, mean funding and political pressure. Science in new areas, rarely has consensus.
With the chronic illness rate of the American population at sixty percent, our first reflex to any study showing a known toxin ‘not to have significant adverse effect to health’ is to call it out for the lie, it surely is. Our medications don’t heal anything and usually cause more damage down the road. The food is tainted with caustic chemicals, most other countries do not allow. For decades the FDA banned successful alternative cancer treatments such as Laetrile, the Gerson method, etc, used in Mexico. DARPA secretly, routinely dumps toxins into our skies, leaving God knows what carnage in our eyes, lungs, soils, water tables. We have to accept the fact we’ve been deliberately, systematically poisoned for profit and likely for population control. The worst actors of commerce determine our lifespans for mercantile interests, under the guise of federal agencies they’ve perfectly captured and control. These people who’ve proven themselves to be the epitome of evil and apparently birthed in hell, tell us to ‘trust the science’ they’ve written and not to trust our own common sense observations.
In Robert Kennedy Jr, we finally have someone with the intelligence, experience and above all - moral courage fighting for us and I trust him with every fiber of my being. How many people do you know that is willing to live a life of constant struggle against corporate evil, to protect his fellow man? We have opportunity here and now, to right the criminality waged against us for decades but, we cannot place this responsibility solely on the shoulders of Secretary Kennedy. We cannot sit back and whine when things aren’t ‘instantly fixed’, we don’t get to do that! We must bring the fight to those responsible and are beneficiaries of this butchery, in direct fashion. We make it a habit of writing to the heads of our federal agencies, putting them on notice we’re not standing for this bs any longer. We also make sure the idiots we elect to make law, understand our moral outrage and expectations of reversing the calamities their legislation brought to our lives. They all take corporate payoffs, they don’t deserve to be treated with respect after selling us out. Finally, Robert Kennedy said something that hit me like a slap in the face and I now live by. He said, I’m paraphrasing “there is a burden to living in a democratic society, to make sure the people’s rights are protected and those elected to office are acting in favor of the citizens.” In the final analysis, whether or not we’re successful at restoring the government from wholly corrupt to working for the citizens - is entirely up to you and me. Let’s get after it.
Not saying anything about the actual points being raised here, I think I am generally on your side of things, but I think using an AI to make your point for you is just extremely embarrassing and childish. You can make AI say whatever you want if you press it enough, so it agreeing with you is meaningless. Why not just take the reasonings and argumentation and write it yourself and take ownership of it?
Thank you, as always, for such profoundly important work. And I think your ultra-clear headlines are extremely helpful for making an impact.
I've added this post to a curation of evidence on harmful vaccine ingredients:
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/she-pushed-for-tests-to-be-conducted
here an OLD 2006 THESIS work supported by DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR UNIVERSITY, AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
title:
"IN VITRO TOXICITY OF ALUMINUM NANOPARTICLES IN RAT ALVEOLAR MACROPHAGES"
few quotes, telling a lot:
1. "Aluminum exposure has been seen to affect red blood cell numbers, oxygen uptake
ability, and clotting ability. Anemia as defined by the Merk Manual is the “Decrease in
the numbers of RBCs or hemoglobin content caused by blood loss, deficient
erythropoiesis, excessive hemolysis, or a combination of these changes” (Beers and
Berkow, 1999: 849). Aluminum causes decreased hemoglobin synthesis in bone marrow
cells and erythroleukemia cells resulting in microcrytic hypochromic anemia. Aluminum
also appears to affect the amount of intracellular iron available to hemoglobin (Yokel and
Golub, 1996: Ch 7, 137-140)."
2. "Other studies found that aluminum foundry workers and welders had alterations in eye hand coordination, memory, and sub clinical tremors (Toxicological Profile for Aluminum (update), 1999: 29-30)."
3. IMPORTANT ONE: "Alzheimer’s Disease as defined by Merck is “ A progressive, inexorable loss of
cognitive function associated with an excessive number of senile plaques in the cerebral
cortex and subcortical gray matter, which also contains beta-amyloid and neurofibrillary
tangles consisting of tau protein” (Beers and Berkow, 1999: 1395-1396). In 1994, Shin
determined that aluminum binds to these tau proteins and causes them to aggregate and to
not go through proteolysis." -> thus it is NOT the missfolded amyloids which are read cause of Alzheimers, but rather the metals which crosslink it and prevent digestive proteolysis.. Anyone wonders why NIH & Co. never give ANY grants to investigate ALUMINUM, but rather the amyloids which are natural in the brain?? Amyloids will never solve the problem, while the real cause will increase the DEATHS and stay untouched! Well at least we got this today: "New hope for Alzheimer’s: lithium supplement reverses memory loss in mice" (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02471-4)
It is all free to read and it is very complete study. One good study should be enough, and how many we got with still no answer?? Please search PubMed for 'aluminum toxicity', you get 9510 studies... How many more are needed in order to finally admit the truth??? Well academia needs money, and those who have it, DO NOT CARE ABOUT US, HUMANS.
Steve,
Are you aware that the Supplementary Data was corrected on 17 July 2025, May have a bearing on your AI result.
Would be interested in what AI you used
Steve tonight on the CBS Evening News with Maurice DuBois; at 6:39 p.m. e.t. they did a segment on the fact that RFK Jr. announced that funding for mrna technology vaccines is being cut by the federal government. They proceeded to bring in their medical expert Dr. Jon Lapook. He interviewed other so-called experts who stated the covid vaccines were proven safe and effective and they went on to bash RFK Jr. for not presenting any data to support cutting funding for mrna vaccines. Can you help regarding this??? Everything you publish states how unsafe and ineffective the covid vaccines were/are. You're friends with RFK Jr.? These people need to be challenged. There is no one better to challenge them than you and your team of experts. How are we ever going to get the truth out to the American public?
Anyone seen the videos on being live monitored by defense for seed use of AI? People who use AI to discuss matters not aligned with official narrative or who challenge it are not viewed as users but as risk?
What does it mean?
It is abundantly clear that the purpose of life is to be experimented upon.
Sad.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/japans-mrna-bombshell-21-million
Another problem with the study design is that the total amount of aluminum injected before age two (only) is compared with diagnoses that are recorded from age two forward (only).
By tracking diagnoses from age two forward only, this design excludes all diagnoses (up and including death) before age two, including, for example, any that occur close-in-time to an aluminum injection administered before age two.
By excluding any aluminum injections after age two, this design also prevents discovery of correlations between lifetime cumulative exposure (when the cumulative exposure includes injections after age two) and the diagnosed conditions.
Continued thanks for your dogedness steve. I was anxiously waiting for someone to expose this.
Christopher Exley (researcher on biological effects of aluminum, author of papers like the above in Nature) would be really good to consult about the absurd Danish “study”.
Here is Chris' latest substack.
https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/cry-wolf
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-64734-6
From Claude Sonet 4.
Now I can see the specific allegations being made. This is a detailed critique by Steve Kirsch claiming the study should be retracted. Let me evaluate these claims:
**Key Allegations:**
1. **Data manipulation**: Claims the supplement was revised, doubling neurodevelopmental events from ~2,200 to 5,200+ without transparent disclosure
1. **Suppression of significant findings**: Alleges that statistically significant associations between aluminum and neurodevelopmental outcomes were buried in the supplement while the main text claimed “no association”
1. **Inadequate follow-up period**: Only following children to age 5-8 when autism/ADHD are typically diagnosed later in Denmark (ages 7-12)
1. **Institutional conflicts**: SSI (the research institution) manufactures vaccines
**My Assessment:**
**Serious Allegations That Need Investigation:**
- If the supplement was indeed substantially revised without proper disclosure, that would be a major concern
- If statistically significant associations exist in the supplement but are contradicted in the main text, that’s problematic
**However, I’m Cautious About:**
- This critique comes from Steve Kirsch, who has a known anti-vaccine stance and has made previous claims that weren’t supported by mainstream scientific consensus
- The analysis is presented as “AI analysis” without clear methodology or independent verification
- Some methodological critiques (like follow-up periods) might be limitations rather than fatal flaws
**What Would Be Needed:**
- Independent verification of the supplement revision claims
- Statistical review by neutral epidemiologists
- Access to both versions of the supplement for comparison
- Peer review of the statistical methodology
The allegations are serious enough to warrant investigation, but I’d want to see independent verification from credible sources before concluding retraction is necessary. What’s your view on these specific claims?
Sir, why do you feel that claims, supported by data and logic, need also be supported by "mainstream scientific consensus"? "Mainstream science", and "consensus", these days, mean funding and political pressure. Science in new areas, rarely has consensus.
Yes.
Being extreme cowards the death cult vermin will panic, turn on each other and beg for mercy, where none would be forthcoming,.
Once a meaningful number of these psychopaths are executed after convictions for genocide and treason, the death cult will collapse.
With the chronic illness rate of the American population at sixty percent, our first reflex to any study showing a known toxin ‘not to have significant adverse effect to health’ is to call it out for the lie, it surely is. Our medications don’t heal anything and usually cause more damage down the road. The food is tainted with caustic chemicals, most other countries do not allow. For decades the FDA banned successful alternative cancer treatments such as Laetrile, the Gerson method, etc, used in Mexico. DARPA secretly, routinely dumps toxins into our skies, leaving God knows what carnage in our eyes, lungs, soils, water tables. We have to accept the fact we’ve been deliberately, systematically poisoned for profit and likely for population control. The worst actors of commerce determine our lifespans for mercantile interests, under the guise of federal agencies they’ve perfectly captured and control. These people who’ve proven themselves to be the epitome of evil and apparently birthed in hell, tell us to ‘trust the science’ they’ve written and not to trust our own common sense observations.
In Robert Kennedy Jr, we finally have someone with the intelligence, experience and above all - moral courage fighting for us and I trust him with every fiber of my being. How many people do you know that is willing to live a life of constant struggle against corporate evil, to protect his fellow man? We have opportunity here and now, to right the criminality waged against us for decades but, we cannot place this responsibility solely on the shoulders of Secretary Kennedy. We cannot sit back and whine when things aren’t ‘instantly fixed’, we don’t get to do that! We must bring the fight to those responsible and are beneficiaries of this butchery, in direct fashion. We make it a habit of writing to the heads of our federal agencies, putting them on notice we’re not standing for this bs any longer. We also make sure the idiots we elect to make law, understand our moral outrage and expectations of reversing the calamities their legislation brought to our lives. They all take corporate payoffs, they don’t deserve to be treated with respect after selling us out. Finally, Robert Kennedy said something that hit me like a slap in the face and I now live by. He said, I’m paraphrasing “there is a burden to living in a democratic society, to make sure the people’s rights are protected and those elected to office are acting in favor of the citizens.” In the final analysis, whether or not we’re successful at restoring the government from wholly corrupt to working for the citizens - is entirely up to you and me. Let’s get after it.
Right on Daniel !! (substack comments won't register when i click 'like';-)