For over 15 years I have suggested my patients do this. If your doctor/practitioner is making claims regarding ANYTHING they recommend (shots, vaccines, medication, screenings, procedures...) kindly let them know you would like to make informed decisions (you are the client paying for their expertise/service), that you appreciate their …
For over 15 years I have suggested my patients do this. If your doctor/practitioner is making claims regarding ANYTHING they recommend (shots, vaccines, medication, screenings, procedures...) kindly let them know you would like to make informed decisions (you are the client paying for their expertise/service), that you appreciate their expertise and respectfully request they PUT IN WRITING exactly what they are recommending, why it is being recommended, to provide the risks vs benefits, and most importantly ask for their personal guarantee that what they are recommending will not cause you or your child harm. Also, ask the doctor/practitioner who will ultimately be liable if harm is caused. I also suggest they respectfully let their doctor/practitioner know that you will be taking electronic notes so you may review the information later (basically, you are recording the appointment that you are paying for). Don't ask, just politely inform them. This seems to do the trick in ending those fearmonger's attempts to gain your blind compliance. It also forces them to be better doctors.
Type written matter supersedes printed matters. Hand written matter supersedes typewritten and printed matter.
As such, if a document says you waive your right to hold your doctor accountable for parroting the CDC, FDA or big pharma, writing something to the effect of "all rights reserved and any waiver of a right resulting from the language of the above agreement is a mistake, and null and void.
Your signature is, always, the last thing on the page. Anything under it is not binding.
In my opinion, based on a few years of experience, assembling notice and serving it on doctors and personnel can be a game changer.
FIRST, there is assembling sound information. Think in terms of a State of Washington law set out at RCW 9A.72.080. It says, "Any statement not known to be true is false." Include relative information that can be proven. Things like the drug company's own admission it did not test drugs. Admissions the for profit drugs do not stop people from getting or transmitting covid. Then toss in some indisputable statistics on increases in deaths among certain groups.
The notice can include declarations (e.g., "attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, as if fully set out herein is. . . ."). You could even warn retaliating against a patient by dropping them. or otherwise negatively reacting against them, if they ask too many questions and such, MAY result in further scrutiny of the professional's past and present activities, and other legal actions.
SECOND, have a disinterested third party with no association with your doctor or the medical corporation serve the notice on as many contracted with or otherwise agents of the corporation as possible.
THIRD, have the one serving notice sign an Affidavit of Service detailing the details of service. That is, what was served, when it was served, who it was served to, the date and time it was served, where it was served and anything else that could challenge challenges to the claim of service.
Hell, go broke and file the notice with an auditor. ALTERNATELY, start a generic case with a county clerk acting as the defacto court clerk and file it there. Where a lot of future information could be filed, then called upon, AS A PUBLIC RECORD).
The whole idea is to notice doctors and corporate administrators of their professional and private liability for their acts and omissions without putting their clients ) patients at risk of being outed and dumped by their caretakers.
SIDE NOTE: You can even take a lesson from Billy Jack. You can tell the people you are serving you are going to plant your foot against the side of their head. . . .
In this case, it would sound more like: "You are advised this Notice of_________ is part of a process of building a record that can be used against you, your associates and artificial persons (i.e., ______, Inc.) in future law suits for damages individuals suffer resulting from your incompetence, neglect or other act or omission relative to ____________.
I could go on and on, but it really can be as simple as I described (build that house a brick at a time).
Stellar. This is exactly what I would do if I were still going to medical doctors which I'm not nor have I for many many years. As such I no longer have a horse in this race. I sincerely hope others will take your advice to heart
Informed consent used to be a big deal. Now the facilities just rush patients through the paperwork. “Just sign here, here, and here, and initial this, this, and this.” We have to stay on schedule, after all.
For over 15 years I have suggested my patients do this. If your doctor/practitioner is making claims regarding ANYTHING they recommend (shots, vaccines, medication, screenings, procedures...) kindly let them know you would like to make informed decisions (you are the client paying for their expertise/service), that you appreciate their expertise and respectfully request they PUT IN WRITING exactly what they are recommending, why it is being recommended, to provide the risks vs benefits, and most importantly ask for their personal guarantee that what they are recommending will not cause you or your child harm. Also, ask the doctor/practitioner who will ultimately be liable if harm is caused. I also suggest they respectfully let their doctor/practitioner know that you will be taking electronic notes so you may review the information later (basically, you are recording the appointment that you are paying for). Don't ask, just politely inform them. This seems to do the trick in ending those fearmonger's attempts to gain your blind compliance. It also forces them to be better doctors.
Remember, in law and regarding signing documents:
Type written matter supersedes printed matters. Hand written matter supersedes typewritten and printed matter.
As such, if a document says you waive your right to hold your doctor accountable for parroting the CDC, FDA or big pharma, writing something to the effect of "all rights reserved and any waiver of a right resulting from the language of the above agreement is a mistake, and null and void.
Your signature is, always, the last thing on the page. Anything under it is not binding.
Good to know.
In my opinion, based on a few years of experience, assembling notice and serving it on doctors and personnel can be a game changer.
FIRST, there is assembling sound information. Think in terms of a State of Washington law set out at RCW 9A.72.080. It says, "Any statement not known to be true is false." Include relative information that can be proven. Things like the drug company's own admission it did not test drugs. Admissions the for profit drugs do not stop people from getting or transmitting covid. Then toss in some indisputable statistics on increases in deaths among certain groups.
The notice can include declarations (e.g., "attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, as if fully set out herein is. . . ."). You could even warn retaliating against a patient by dropping them. or otherwise negatively reacting against them, if they ask too many questions and such, MAY result in further scrutiny of the professional's past and present activities, and other legal actions.
SECOND, have a disinterested third party with no association with your doctor or the medical corporation serve the notice on as many contracted with or otherwise agents of the corporation as possible.
THIRD, have the one serving notice sign an Affidavit of Service detailing the details of service. That is, what was served, when it was served, who it was served to, the date and time it was served, where it was served and anything else that could challenge challenges to the claim of service.
Hell, go broke and file the notice with an auditor. ALTERNATELY, start a generic case with a county clerk acting as the defacto court clerk and file it there. Where a lot of future information could be filed, then called upon, AS A PUBLIC RECORD).
The whole idea is to notice doctors and corporate administrators of their professional and private liability for their acts and omissions without putting their clients ) patients at risk of being outed and dumped by their caretakers.
SIDE NOTE: You can even take a lesson from Billy Jack. You can tell the people you are serving you are going to plant your foot against the side of their head. . . .
In this case, it would sound more like: "You are advised this Notice of_________ is part of a process of building a record that can be used against you, your associates and artificial persons (i.e., ______, Inc.) in future law suits for damages individuals suffer resulting from your incompetence, neglect or other act or omission relative to ____________.
I could go on and on, but it really can be as simple as I described (build that house a brick at a time).
Stellar. This is exactly what I would do if I were still going to medical doctors which I'm not nor have I for many many years. As such I no longer have a horse in this race. I sincerely hope others will take your advice to heart
Informed consent used to be a big deal. Now the facilities just rush patients through the paperwork. “Just sign here, here, and here, and initial this, this, and this.” We have to stay on schedule, after all.