Your paper could have used the Pfizer 393-page report of about 10,000 different types of Adverse Event known to the company by June 2022. It is known as PSUR3.
Your paper could have used the Pfizer 393-page report of about 10,000 different types of Adverse Event known to the company by June 2022. It is known as PSUR3.
Actually, it's already in the paper -- please read it! The paper is now on Pubmed but "open access" will be delayed for a bit. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38274635/
Those refs are different. Not sure what you're talking about regarding that error. As for the endotoxin issue, we covered as much as we could but had to remove a lot of content to satisfy all 8 reviewers' and the Cureus editors' requests.
Hi Steve,
Your paper could have used the Pfizer 393-page report of about 10,000 different types of Adverse Event known to the company by June 2022. It is known as PSUR3.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/endotoxin-harms-list-a-k
Actually, it's already in the paper -- please read it! The paper is now on Pubmed but "open access" will be delayed for a bit. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38274635/
Thanks, I stand corrected.
I read now that you have the error "2022–2016" eight times in the references attached to the PubMed version.
Are Refs 114 and 252 the same?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38274635/
Why don't you mention Endotoxin Induced Myocarditis ?
Those refs are different. Not sure what you're talking about regarding that error. As for the endotoxin issue, we covered as much as we could but had to remove a lot of content to satisfy all 8 reviewers' and the Cureus editors' requests.
What does "2022–2016" mean? Can't be page sequence.