This is only a "trend of correlations". If you know what you are talking about then you shouldn't be able to sleep at night for misleading people
Correlations are not absolute values! I can't believe what I just saw
You're missing the point. If the vaccines were highly effective, barring some amazing hidden variable, we should see a sharply negative correlation. This is the data for the entire world.
And it's consistent with all the other data I've worked with. The inter-national and intra-national trends are in agreement! The more vaccination, the more cases and deaths.
That doesn't even begin to get into the mechanistic story, but this will all take a few million words to tell.
a negative correlation would mean "the more people get it, the less they die", let alone that having the vaccine is correlated with less infection, so ...
The planet earth deserved better than you stupids :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) I really don't know how you survived the evolution :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I investigate systems via data for a living. Correlations are the starting point of almost every step forward. ItтАЩs not always what it seems but they tell you where to look. So them not looking at correlations - avoiding them as they are waved in their face - tells you theyтАЩre not scientists or acting in good faith. They are frauds.
I'd be interested in your take on this man's studies. He finds the correlation between manufacturer batches and reported adverse events. It's very interesting. https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3KRJ7WXgSw8T/
I've seen it - it's so ridiculous that I would like to get the data myself and prove it, because I can't quite believe it. It reminds me of research I did once where I thought I was differentiating between diseases but I was actually differentiating between CT scanners ie. the people with each set of conditions were scanned on different machines.
Here, the batch and not the person is seems to be what's important. If the adverse outcome is indeed dependent on the batch in the systematic way he shows (ie. not somewhat random due to say poor quality control, but with regular patterns), then honestly the situation is much much worse than I think it is (and I'm not exactly optimistic now).
If this has been planned down to the minutest detail of particular batches, then we have our work cut out for us for a long time to come, if we survive.
As the doc pointed out, the governments could refute the correlation by releasing their data. But they won't. Also, if the vaccines are "safe and effective," why are all the manufacturers still shielded from liability? Would you buy a car that had no warranty? Would you risk your life on an injection that the manufacturer will not stand behind?
No need to refute the correlation!!!! this is again another misleading non-sense.
I can't repeat more than enough: If you know what you're talking about, I really don't know how you can sleep at night when you have misled people during the day...
And if you don't know what you're talking about (i.e., the CORRELATION), then may God help you understand!!!!!!
You are very stupid, you simply couldn't be more stupid than you are. Have a good day and don't go to hospital once you get covid if you're not vaccinated. stupid :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
This is only a "trend of correlations". If you know what you are talking about then you shouldn't be able to sleep at night for misleading people
Correlations are not absolute values! I can't believe what I just saw
Noticing coincidences is antisemetic, goyim.
You're missing the point. If the vaccines were highly effective, barring some amazing hidden variable, we should see a sharply negative correlation. This is the data for the entire world.
And it's consistent with all the other data I've worked with. The inter-national and intra-national trends are in agreement! The more vaccination, the more cases and deaths.
That doesn't even begin to get into the mechanistic story, but this will all take a few million words to tell.
LOL, you simply couldn't be more stupid!!!!
a negative correlation would mean "the more people get it, the less they die", let alone that having the vaccine is correlated with less infection, so ...
The planet earth deserved better than you stupids :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) I really don't know how you survived the evolution :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Take my hat off to you, you had me fooled. This is genius level trolling, one of the best ever.
I investigate systems via data for a living. Correlations are the starting point of almost every step forward. ItтАЩs not always what it seems but they tell you where to look. So them not looking at correlations - avoiding them as they are waved in their face - tells you theyтАЩre not scientists or acting in good faith. They are frauds.
I'd be interested in your take on this man's studies. He finds the correlation between manufacturer batches and reported adverse events. It's very interesting. https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3KRJ7WXgSw8T/
I've seen it - it's so ridiculous that I would like to get the data myself and prove it, because I can't quite believe it. It reminds me of research I did once where I thought I was differentiating between diseases but I was actually differentiating between CT scanners ie. the people with each set of conditions were scanned on different machines.
Here, the batch and not the person is seems to be what's important. If the adverse outcome is indeed dependent on the batch in the systematic way he shows (ie. not somewhat random due to say poor quality control, but with regular patterns), then honestly the situation is much much worse than I think it is (and I'm not exactly optimistic now).
If this has been planned down to the minutest detail of particular batches, then we have our work cut out for us for a long time to come, if we survive.
Exactly yes.
It is the first red flag tho. Pull the thread and see where it goes. If only we had good data.
As the doc pointed out, the governments could refute the correlation by releasing their data. But they won't. Also, if the vaccines are "safe and effective," why are all the manufacturers still shielded from liability? Would you buy a car that had no warranty? Would you risk your life on an injection that the manufacturer will not stand behind?
You don't need to refute the correlation, it just is. You need to explain it, to provide additional evidence as to the meaning or the cause.
No need to refute the correlation!!!! this is again another misleading non-sense.
I can't repeat more than enough: If you know what you're talking about, I really don't know how you can sleep at night when you have misled people during the day...
And if you don't know what you're talking about (i.e., the CORRELATION), then may God help you understand!!!!!!
At a minimum, the graph proves the jabs don't do anything. But anyone with any common sense could see that jabs makes things worse.
Very Stupid, Rob
You are very stupid, you simply couldn't be more stupid than you are. Have a good day and don't go to hospital once you get covid if you're not vaccinated. stupid :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
It's good the way the people you shouldn't listen to always flag themselves by larding their posts with ad hominem attacks isn't it?
Yup.
When they canтАЩt respond with facts they call you mean names.
Oh scary. Lol.
Your rudeness is more interesting than your thoughts, just FYI.