Bro, he said that nearly everyone is showing elevated levels of troponin, which indicates some level of heart damage. The 1:28 ration is referencing the rate of sub-clinical myocarditis in boys. In the video he points out that 1:28 is two orders of magnitude higher than the “normal” 1:3500. Just because there were no symptoms of heart da…
Bro, he said that nearly everyone is showing elevated levels of troponin, which indicates some level of heart damage. The 1:28 ration is referencing the rate of sub-clinical myocarditis in boys. In the video he points out that 1:28 is two orders of magnitude higher than the “normal” 1:3500. Just because there were no symptoms of heart damage doesn’t mean that the heart wasn’t damaged. If someone smokes for 30 years and never has any signs of cancer or difficulty breathing or any adverse effects are their lungs and throat undamaged? Of course not, the damage is just sub-rosa
No one in this neck of the woods is checking troponin levels so elevations, if any, are not known. I have a friend that asked his doctor about it and he was told that in the absence of symptoms the test is not done. I am not disagreeing that there is damage, just saying that there is no confirmation among those that I know.
Bro, he said that nearly everyone is showing elevated levels of troponin, which indicates some level of heart damage. The 1:28 ration is referencing the rate of sub-clinical myocarditis in boys. In the video he points out that 1:28 is two orders of magnitude higher than the “normal” 1:3500. Just because there were no symptoms of heart damage doesn’t mean that the heart wasn’t damaged. If someone smokes for 30 years and never has any signs of cancer or difficulty breathing or any adverse effects are their lungs and throat undamaged? Of course not, the damage is just sub-rosa
No one in this neck of the woods is checking troponin levels so elevations, if any, are not known. I have a friend that asked his doctor about it and he was told that in the absence of symptoms the test is not done. I am not disagreeing that there is damage, just saying that there is no confirmation among those that I know.
I think this article in part is making the case we should be checking.
I think everyone who is vaccinated should be checked so we can get real data on this, and those unaware can wake up.