The COVID vaccines were one of the dumbest public health interventions of all time. In this post I describe the results from applying a novel, objective analysis method to the COVID vaccine data.
Simple model doesn’t equal better I want to see your stats number. R stats and how much variation is in your data lol. But as people have asked you are unwilling. Or unwilling to test your model because it doesn’t have enough data to be accurate.
I’m over 70. Only did J&J one shot March ‘21. Addressing your outcome foe us ‘losers’. I grew up on a farm with a cow for raw milk, chickens for eggs, and beef bought from a neighbor. We have incredible immune systems because the heavy vaxxed hadn’t gotten started. Mom boosted our immune system by keeping us home for mumps and measles and chickenpox. No VAX!!! Exposing us to these inconveniences built our strong bodies. Junk food and all those AG chemicals from wartime came after we were out of school system. We all lived free of Big Pharma and Big Ag and CAFO did not exist. So I am unmedicated and RFK jr has my deepest prayers. He and I were raised as free range kids. Thank for your posts.
Steve, this summary is of an Italian study looking at incidence of cancer following the vax. However, one conclusion was that all cause mortality dropped after 1 or more doses. Can you reconcile this with your analyses?
Summary: the Anecdotal reports suggested an association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and some cancers, but no formal assessment has been published. This population-wide cohort analysis was aimed at evaluating the risk of all-cause death and cancer hospitalization by SARS-CoV-2 immunization status. Using National Health System official data, the entire population of the Pescara province, Italy was followed from June 2021 (six months after the first vaccination) to December 2023. Cox models were adjusted for age, gender, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and selected comorbidities. Of the 296,015 residents aged ≥11 years, 16.6% were unvaccinated, 83.3% received ≥1 dose, and 62.2% ≥3 doses. Compared with the unvaccinated, those receiving ≥1 dose showed a significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death, and a slightly higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11-1.37).
His study showing mortality diff between moderna and pfizer solve 2 important issues with observational studies. 1. HVE 2. immortality bias. these are 2 issues that render the overwhelmingly majority of observational studies that purport to show benefit as complete BS. Grok gets a lot of things wrong and also lies a lot with covid and anything having to do with the vaccines. an example is myocarditis with covid vs pfizer. Grok is only as good as what is out on the internet. the end.
The “school” of what some call satan is the biomedical education. The helpless, dangerous medical scientists/doctors. To have a chance to save our species, we must mercilessly defy them.
Kirsch's essay overstates the Czech data's implications by relying on a simplistic methodology (KCOR) that doesn't adequately account for confounders like comorbidities, age, or selection bias. His claims of widespread vaccine harm, particularly for Moderna, are not supported by robust causal evidence and contradict broader epidemiological data showing vaccines reduced COVID-related mortality and hospitalizations.
KCOR is a flawed tool for analyzing vaccine-related mortality due to its oversimplification, inadequate confounder adjustment, susceptibility to bias, and lack of peer-reviewed validation. It risks producing misleading conclusions, as seen in Kirsch's interpretation of the Czech data, where Moderna's higher mortality likely reflects cohort differences rather than vaccine harm. For reliable insights, epidemiologists should prioritize established methods that account for the complexity of mortality data.
If someone had told you 5 years ago that you would be leading the charge on deep dive statistical analysis of medical data, you would have thought they were crazy.
Did you see the article about the resigning CDC people who are upset that the CDC work is being reviewed and that the recommendation for pregnant women and children getting Covid shots is being removed?
In typical rhetoric they referred to it as reviewing policies for "science that was settled". They are quite upset. I wonder if they are going to leave the country to try to avoid accountability.
I hope your KCOR contribution takes hold for future work. Not to down play the statistics, but come on, figuring out if people died from the vaccine seems trivial. It's not like you're doing some complex real time Fourier transform and looking for signals buried in noise. Love the AI review "rather than the pseudoscientific contortions". Great job Steve!
Steve, your unwavering tenacity with all yo do for humanity and the future, will have its place historically, as we progress out of this loathsome darkness. Thank you so much and gratitude from us all.
Simple model doesn’t equal better I want to see your stats number. R stats and how much variation is in your data lol. But as people have asked you are unwilling. Or unwilling to test your model because it doesn’t have enough data to be accurate.
This is nuts and just dead wrong
I’m over 70. Only did J&J one shot March ‘21. Addressing your outcome foe us ‘losers’. I grew up on a farm with a cow for raw milk, chickens for eggs, and beef bought from a neighbor. We have incredible immune systems because the heavy vaxxed hadn’t gotten started. Mom boosted our immune system by keeping us home for mumps and measles and chickenpox. No VAX!!! Exposing us to these inconveniences built our strong bodies. Junk food and all those AG chemicals from wartime came after we were out of school system. We all lived free of Big Pharma and Big Ag and CAFO did not exist. So I am unmedicated and RFK jr has my deepest prayers. He and I were raised as free range kids. Thank for your posts.
Steve, if you are looking to legitimize KCOR
then why not run it on a historical dataset ?
A recalled drug like viox for example ? Where no one could ever argue it should never have been recalled
If the computations work out with that, wouldn’t it solidify its use in the vaccines ? Especially with there always hidden datasets ?? 👍
Steve, this summary is of an Italian study looking at incidence of cancer following the vax. However, one conclusion was that all cause mortality dropped after 1 or more doses. Can you reconcile this with your analyses?
Summary: the Anecdotal reports suggested an association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and some cancers, but no formal assessment has been published. This population-wide cohort analysis was aimed at evaluating the risk of all-cause death and cancer hospitalization by SARS-CoV-2 immunization status. Using National Health System official data, the entire population of the Pescara province, Italy was followed from June 2021 (six months after the first vaccination) to December 2023. Cox models were adjusted for age, gender, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and selected comorbidities. Of the 296,015 residents aged ≥11 years, 16.6% were unvaccinated, 83.3% received ≥1 dose, and 62.2% ≥3 doses. Compared with the unvaccinated, those receiving ≥1 dose showed a significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death, and a slightly higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11-1.37).
His study showing mortality diff between moderna and pfizer solve 2 important issues with observational studies. 1. HVE 2. immortality bias. these are 2 issues that render the overwhelmingly majority of observational studies that purport to show benefit as complete BS. Grok gets a lot of things wrong and also lies a lot with covid and anything having to do with the vaccines. an example is myocarditis with covid vs pfizer. Grok is only as good as what is out on the internet. the end.
The “school” of what some call satan is the biomedical education. The helpless, dangerous medical scientists/doctors. To have a chance to save our species, we must mercilessly defy them.
https://vegetativetraining.wordpress.com/against-the-machine-a-radical-critique-of-mechanistic-reductionism-in-the-age-of-alienation/
The trillion-dollar biotech industry is facing failure – and it’s because of covid injections
https://expose-news.com/2025/08/29/biotech-industry-is-facing-failure/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=es
Hi Steve,
Since you have used AI to validate your thesis, I fed your article to Grok:
Debunking Vaccine Alarmism
A Closer Look at Steve Kirsh' 'Most Important Article'
Frank Visser
https://www.integralworld.net/visser566.html?x2
Conclusion:
Kirsch's essay overstates the Czech data's implications by relying on a simplistic methodology (KCOR) that doesn't adequately account for confounders like comorbidities, age, or selection bias. His claims of widespread vaccine harm, particularly for Moderna, are not supported by robust causal evidence and contradict broader epidemiological data showing vaccines reduced COVID-related mortality and hospitalizations.
KCOR is a flawed tool for analyzing vaccine-related mortality due to its oversimplification, inadequate confounder adjustment, susceptibility to bias, and lack of peer-reviewed validation. It risks producing misleading conclusions, as seen in Kirsch's interpretation of the Czech data, where Moderna's higher mortality likely reflects cohort differences rather than vaccine harm. For reliable insights, epidemiologists should prioritize established methods that account for the complexity of mortality data.
If someone had told you 5 years ago that you would be leading the charge on deep dive statistical analysis of medical data, you would have thought they were crazy.
Did you see the article about the resigning CDC people who are upset that the CDC work is being reviewed and that the recommendation for pregnant women and children getting Covid shots is being removed?
In typical rhetoric they referred to it as reviewing policies for "science that was settled". They are quite upset. I wonder if they are going to leave the country to try to avoid accountability.
Hi Steve
Looks a good piece of work.
I assume the data is stratified by age bands for the under 70s? I’d be interested to see the %ages listed in 10 year bandings.
Similarly, is it stratified by pre-existing health issues? The %ages for fit and healthy younger age bands must be incredibly high?
Cheers, Colin Acton
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
I do not understand numbers. Thankfully you also use words .
Thank you for all that you are doing.
I hope your KCOR contribution takes hold for future work. Not to down play the statistics, but come on, figuring out if people died from the vaccine seems trivial. It's not like you're doing some complex real time Fourier transform and looking for signals buried in noise. Love the AI review "rather than the pseudoscientific contortions". Great job Steve!
Steve, your unwavering tenacity with all yo do for humanity and the future, will have its place historically, as we progress out of this loathsome darkness. Thank you so much and gratitude from us all.