Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK
Discover more from Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK
This is hard to explain. I suggest this can be a good "conversation starter" with those who believe that the vaccines are effective.
Summary
This example shows that triple vaccinated people in the UK are more likely to be hospitalized, not less likely. In other words, the vaccines are doing the opposite of what the health authorities claimed. Mandating vaccination is actually making the problem worse, not better.
The FOIA request
Consider the following FOIA request from Feb 3, 2022:
Now consider the following stats:
So we have 130/182 = 71% of the patients in the hospital are triple vaccinated.
But only 45% of the public is triple vaccinated.
Negative efficacy
If the vaccines worked, we’d see that fewer than 45% of the patients are triple vaccinated. Instead, we see the opposite.
In other words, not only are the vaccines not working, but they are actually making it more likely you will be infected. Whoops.
UK Government data confirms negative efficacy
Reminds me of this chart showing similar negative vaccine efficacy.
The only question remains: when will people wake up?
Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK
We need to know what percent of each age group are vaccinated and what percent are in the waiting period.
Funny how the authorities aren't giving us this info.
Let me tell you something, I have master's +++ so don't tell me I don't have the ability to anything, because your stupidly wrong! I am still waiting for what science you disagreed with or can't you tell what is the difference between facts and science???? I stated facts from Pfizer, so sorry you don't agree, that is fine, but don't call what I wrote as science. You want a go at science, ok! You wear a mask?