Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK
This is hard to explain. I suggest this can be a good "conversation starter" with those who believe that the vaccines are effective.
Summary
This example shows that triple vaccinated people in the UK are more likely to be hospitalized, not less likely. In other words, the vaccines are doing the opposite of what the health authorities claimed. Mandating vaccination is actually making the problem worse, not better.
The FOIA request
Consider the following FOIA request from Feb 3, 2022:
Now consider the following stats:
So we have 130/182 = 71% of the patients in the hospital are triple vaccinated.
But only 45% of the public is triple vaccinated.
Negative efficacy
If the vaccines worked, we’d see that fewer than 45% of the patients are triple vaccinated. Instead, we see the opposite.
In other words, not only are the vaccines not working, but they are actually making it more likely you will be infected. Whoops.
UK Government data confirms negative efficacy
Reminds me of this chart showing similar negative vaccine efficacy.
The only question remains: when will people wake up?
This is damning. But too me, the most damning is the actuary data from insurance companies. These actuary tables are very reliable since insurance companies pin their profitability off of them. They must be extremely accurate since by law life companies must be profitable. All premium is taken off these tables and some policies last a life time so the number need to be good. A sudden jump in deaths is unheard of unless in war time, they are very consistent. The insurance industry cannot hide this phenomena.
A friend said sadly, "I thought I was being so careful" when a positive case came back (I think it was a false-positive and believe this friend only had a cold), after triple shots. Heartbreaking. Is there a "best way" to talk to family and other loved ones about what's truly going on? Depends on the person and situation, but it's a hill to climb. Still struggling with this.