Dr. Naomi Wolf easily verified my truth bombs on Fox; why can't Fox?
Dr. Naomi Wolf used INDEPENDENT methods to verify everything I said on Fox. Brian Kilmeade said Fox "can't verify" what I said. Did he meant "can't" or "won't"?
Executive summary
Dr. Naomi Wolf was easily able to verify what I said on Fox News in just a few days.
Fox was not interested in verifying it. They said they “can’t.” They aren’t kidding. It’s probably due to their advertising contracts with the drug companies. It’s a conflict of interest they’ve never disclosed to their viewers.
Media Matters wrote an article calling me a liar, cited no evidence, and they refuse to engage in a discussion so the public can decide who is right. They permanently banned me from commenting as well.
Introduction
Wolf just posted an article verifying all the key “truth bombs” about the vaccine that I dropped on an unsuspecting Brian Kilmeade on August 10.
How is Wolf able to so easily verify my key statements, yet Fox is not? I even offered Fox all the evidence (which you can see here).
Wolf didn’t rely on any of the same sources that I did in her independent verification. She was easily able to verify what I said was true.
Media Matters vs. Dr. Naomi Wolf: A comparison of research used to justify a belief
Read Wolf’s extensive research. Now compare it with the “no evidence presented” methodology used by Media Matters to argue that what I said was false. They quoted me and said I lied. That’s it.
They provided no evidence that I lied.
Even worse, Media Matters did not respond to my requests to correct the article via their preferred email. When I tried to comment on the article defaming me, they banned me for life:
David Brock, the founder of Media Matters, reached out to me when he started the organization and I agreed to help fund it.
I regret the error.
Everyone makes mistakes. I thought that Media Matters was about upholding truth.
These people aren’t doing that. They are just promoting the mainstream narrative. David Brock ignored my email to try to contact him and all emails to corrections@mediamatters.org go unanswered.
Media Matters loves to hold others “accountable” but when it comes to allowing Media Matters to be held accountable, they run and hide.
Summary
Why do Fox and Media Matters hide from a discussion about what I said? It’s simple
Steve,
We met briefly many years ago in Silicon Valley -I was impressed with you then, but I am even more impressed with you now.
As a friend and co-conspirator, may I suggest that it is time to change your posture and position.
Your core posture is "I'm trying to save lives, why won't anyone listen to me?"
It should be evident to you by now - no one in the establishment cares about saving lives.
In fact if you look at all the evidence the ONLY explanation is that they are INTENTIONALLY trying to increase the death rate.
I know this sounds like tin-foil hat stuff - but I'm happy to argue the case of why this is the *only* rational explanation at length - no other hypothesis has high explanatory power.
There is a grand scheme at work here worth billions and billions of dollars.
You are an impediment to their grand scheme, so you are canceled and ignored.
But the world is changing, and more and more people are waking up.
So may I suggest that now is the time to stop playing by their rules, and launch a *counter offensive*
You have the resources, network, and facts.
By creating a social and political "movement" you could lead America back from the brink.
It will be the fight of a lifetime.
I'm in, if you are.
NDG
Steve, why don't you run for president as a Democrat so you could state your case at the debates before the primaries. The networks would have to cover what you say, and as you would be the only Democrat candidate telling the truth about the CDC, FDA, and NIH you might get the most votes.