That will only *stop* all vaccine production. That was the intent of assuming liability in the first place. If that’s what you want, fine. But that will be the effect. The problem with current government compensation is the government bureaucracy. They don’t care if you are adequately compensation or not. Change the program. Of course, t…
That will only *stop* all vaccine production. That was the intent of assuming liability in the first place. If that’s what you want, fine. But that will be the effect. The problem with current government compensation is the government bureaucracy. They don’t care if you are adequately compensation or not. Change the program. Of course, the government won’t allow such. You are little more than revenue generating farm animals to them. Who cares if they lose a few. Hence the program. They are more than willing to sacrifice you and yours to a deficient drug.
All vaccines harm it seems but not enough people know that due to a century or more of expensive propaganda to get public trust when originally there was little or none for vaccines. Liability ideally would mean that those visibly In jured, harmed, killed woukd need to be compensated and that would make the enterprise far less profitable or ideally non profit making.. But most people probably cannot afford to take legal action because so expensive ( UK ie here, it is). Also no doubt much vaccine Ibjury is not linked to the vaccines ie disease can take years decades to appear.etc.
“ But most people probably cannot afford to take legal action because so expensive”
In the USA, lawsuits are originated all the time as “class action lawsuits”. Folk need not contribute funds, nor sue individually. This allows some sort of smallish compensation, albeit tremendous payback to lawyers. One class action has been going on for decades, asbestos. They are still advertising for those seeking compensation (case settled at to come forward and collect. Was included in at least a couple over the years myself.
That will only *stop* all vaccine production. That was the intent of assuming liability in the first place. If that’s what you want, fine. But that will be the effect. The problem with current government compensation is the government bureaucracy. They don’t care if you are adequately compensation or not. Change the program. Of course, the government won’t allow such. You are little more than revenue generating farm animals to them. Who cares if they lose a few. Hence the program. They are more than willing to sacrifice you and yours to a deficient drug.
Why would that stop all vaccine production? Liability hasn’t stopped other drug production?
All vaccines harm it seems but not enough people know that due to a century or more of expensive propaganda to get public trust when originally there was little or none for vaccines. Liability ideally would mean that those visibly In jured, harmed, killed woukd need to be compensated and that would make the enterprise far less profitable or ideally non profit making.. But most people probably cannot afford to take legal action because so expensive ( UK ie here, it is). Also no doubt much vaccine Ibjury is not linked to the vaccines ie disease can take years decades to appear.etc.
“ But most people probably cannot afford to take legal action because so expensive”
In the USA, lawsuits are originated all the time as “class action lawsuits”. Folk need not contribute funds, nor sue individually. This allows some sort of smallish compensation, albeit tremendous payback to lawyers. One class action has been going on for decades, asbestos. They are still advertising for those seeking compensation (case settled at to come forward and collect. Was included in at least a couple over the years myself.