ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON DEBRA CONRAD'S INTERVIEW
To add to what was in the interview of PA Deborah Conrad, the information below was in letters written by her attorney Aaron Siri on July 19, 2021, (you can find a link at Siri’s website) to the CDC, FDA, and COVID-19 Vaccine task Force. (as far as I know, Siri never received answers to …
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON DEBRA CONRAD'S INTERVIEW
To add to what was in the interview of PA Deborah Conrad, the information below was in letters written by her attorney Aaron Siri on July 19, 2021, (you can find a link at Siri’s website) to the CDC, FDA, and COVID-19 Vaccine task Force. (as far as I know, Siri never received answers to this letter.) Included in the letter is the following:
Ms. Conrad, after much convincing, got the NY State hospital where she worked to track the vaccine status of every patient admitted and found that even though fewer than 50% of the community her hospital served had been vaccinated, 90% of the individuals admitted to the hospital had been vaccinated and were presenting with complaints months after the vaccination.
Ms. Conrad filed VAERRS reports about the conditions she saw and helped other personnel file reports (because they are notoriously difficult and time consuming to file). When questioned by the hospital about her activities, Ms. Conrad said that in addition to at least 5 patients she had personally treated that had presented with new, unprovoked deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolisms within 6 weeks of vaccination, she had also seen patients who, after receipt of the vaccination presented with a new stroke, bleed autoimmune hepatitis, sudden bilateral pneumonia or Covid-19 infection, as well as syncope with head injury, STEMI, new arrhythmias, new seizure disorders, new chorea movement disorder, and more.
However, after auditing Conrad’s reports for a four-week period, which totaled 50 adverse events including 4 deaths, instead of praising her for doing a good job, the hospital chief quality officer stated that she had “not heard this level of reporting from anywhere else and didn’t hear similar reports from (another hospital system).” When Ms. Conrad noted that the reports were accurate (which the hospital did not dispute )and should therefor be reported, the quality officer said that Conrad sounded “anti-vaxxy” and that the organization was following CDC and Department of Health guidelines and so are “very much advocating for patients to receive the vaccine... and want people to understand that on the whole this is a very safe vaccine and that the science supports that.”
This echoes the circular non-reasoning pushed by the Administration that evidence of the dangers of the shots should be suppressed because it would discourage people from getting them, which would be terrible since they are safe. If you ask how do we know they are safe, the answer is, because we have seen no evidence that they are dangerous (since that evidence was suppressed to encourage people to take the shots since they are safe.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON DEBRA CONRAD'S INTERVIEW
To add to what was in the interview of PA Deborah Conrad, the information below was in letters written by her attorney Aaron Siri on July 19, 2021, (you can find a link at Siri’s website) to the CDC, FDA, and COVID-19 Vaccine task Force. (as far as I know, Siri never received answers to this letter.) Included in the letter is the following:
Ms. Conrad, after much convincing, got the NY State hospital where she worked to track the vaccine status of every patient admitted and found that even though fewer than 50% of the community her hospital served had been vaccinated, 90% of the individuals admitted to the hospital had been vaccinated and were presenting with complaints months after the vaccination.
Ms. Conrad filed VAERRS reports about the conditions she saw and helped other personnel file reports (because they are notoriously difficult and time consuming to file). When questioned by the hospital about her activities, Ms. Conrad said that in addition to at least 5 patients she had personally treated that had presented with new, unprovoked deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolisms within 6 weeks of vaccination, she had also seen patients who, after receipt of the vaccination presented with a new stroke, bleed autoimmune hepatitis, sudden bilateral pneumonia or Covid-19 infection, as well as syncope with head injury, STEMI, new arrhythmias, new seizure disorders, new chorea movement disorder, and more.
However, after auditing Conrad’s reports for a four-week period, which totaled 50 adverse events including 4 deaths, instead of praising her for doing a good job, the hospital chief quality officer stated that she had “not heard this level of reporting from anywhere else and didn’t hear similar reports from (another hospital system).” When Ms. Conrad noted that the reports were accurate (which the hospital did not dispute )and should therefor be reported, the quality officer said that Conrad sounded “anti-vaxxy” and that the organization was following CDC and Department of Health guidelines and so are “very much advocating for patients to receive the vaccine... and want people to understand that on the whole this is a very safe vaccine and that the science supports that.”
This echoes the circular non-reasoning pushed by the Administration that evidence of the dangers of the shots should be suppressed because it would discourage people from getting them, which would be terrible since they are safe. If you ask how do we know they are safe, the answer is, because we have seen no evidence that they are dangerous (since that evidence was suppressed to encourage people to take the shots since they are safe.)