Uh huh.
Just like the "studies" done on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin that had to be withdrawn quietly,
Or the valid studies that have been rejected or ignored for one reason or another by the journals who receive funding from foundations interested in keeping the jab going,
Or the few studies that found issues with the jab, but t…
Just like the "studies" done on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin that had to be withdrawn quietly,
Or the valid studies that have been rejected or ignored for one reason or another by the journals who receive funding from foundations interested in keeping the jab going,
Or the few studies that found issues with the jab, but to get published stated at the end, but the jab still protects most people--but not citing evidence of it,
Or, later, when transmission by the vaxed was discovered, studies that said at the conclusion, but it keeps you from getting more sick--again without any evidence or citation all to get published.
Uh huh.
Just like the "studies" done on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin that had to be withdrawn quietly,
Or the valid studies that have been rejected or ignored for one reason or another by the journals who receive funding from foundations interested in keeping the jab going,
Or the few studies that found issues with the jab, but to get published stated at the end, but the jab still protects most people--but not citing evidence of it,
Or, later, when transmission by the vaxed was discovered, studies that said at the conclusion, but it keeps you from getting more sick--again without any evidence or citation all to get published.
I remember them being referred to as Breakthrough Cases. 😂😂😂