Not really. It was to make the point very clear and you still missed it. But to try yet again, perhaps your comment - "Now we'll never know whether better results might have been obtained through a consistently kind (or at least cordial) approach." could be applied to all the evil dark despots in human history. Are you trolling or do actually believe what you wrote?
Not really. It was to make the point very clear and you still missed it. But to try yet again, perhaps your comment - "Now we'll never know whether better results might have been obtained through a consistently kind (or at least cordial) approach." could be applied to all the evil dark despots in human history. Are you trolling or do actually believe what you wrote?
My point is that Northrup is not an "evil dark despot", she's a mid-level bureaucrat.
Are you ascribing evil motives to me, too? Should "trolls" (that is, Substackers who disagree with you) be hung on the same gallows as Northrup, and along with Klaus Schwab, the British royal family, and the Rothschilds?
Not really. It was to make the point very clear and you still missed it. But to try yet again, perhaps your comment - "Now we'll never know whether better results might have been obtained through a consistently kind (or at least cordial) approach." could be applied to all the evil dark despots in human history. Are you trolling or do actually believe what you wrote?
My point is that Northrup is not an "evil dark despot", she's a mid-level bureaucrat.
Are you ascribing evil motives to me, too? Should "trolls" (that is, Substackers who disagree with you) be hung on the same gallows as Northrup, and along with Klaus Schwab, the British royal family, and the Rothschilds?