I'm sorry, but what an angry and unjustified comment. Nobody is shooting babies in the head. Regardless of whether the vaxx is actually "safe and effective", our lower-level functionaries in this country have been deceived to think so. They don't have the intent to commit deadly crimes. On the contrary, they think of themselves as heroes…
I'm sorry, but what an angry and unjustified comment. Nobody is shooting babies in the head. Regardless of whether the vaxx is actually "safe and effective", our lower-level functionaries in this country have been deceived to think so. They don't have the intent to commit deadly crimes. On the contrary, they think of themselves as heroes for promoting the vaxx as hard as they can.
The prediction that Northrup would be unresponsive, has proven to be correct. Now we'll never know whether better results might have been obtained through a consistently kind (or at least cordial) approach.
Not really. It was to make the point very clear and you still missed it. But to try yet again, perhaps your comment - "Now we'll never know whether better results might have been obtained through a consistently kind (or at least cordial) approach." could be applied to all the evil dark despots in human history. Are you trolling or do actually believe what you wrote?
My point is that Northrup is not an "evil dark despot", she's a mid-level bureaucrat.
Are you ascribing evil motives to me, too? Should "trolls" (that is, Substackers who disagree with you) be hung on the same gallows as Northrup, and along with Klaus Schwab, the British royal family, and the Rothschilds?
I'm sorry, but what an angry and unjustified comment. Nobody is shooting babies in the head. Regardless of whether the vaxx is actually "safe and effective", our lower-level functionaries in this country have been deceived to think so. They don't have the intent to commit deadly crimes. On the contrary, they think of themselves as heroes for promoting the vaxx as hard as they can.
The prediction that Northrup would be unresponsive, has proven to be correct. Now we'll never know whether better results might have been obtained through a consistently kind (or at least cordial) approach.
Not really. It was to make the point very clear and you still missed it. But to try yet again, perhaps your comment - "Now we'll never know whether better results might have been obtained through a consistently kind (or at least cordial) approach." could be applied to all the evil dark despots in human history. Are you trolling or do actually believe what you wrote?
My point is that Northrup is not an "evil dark despot", she's a mid-level bureaucrat.
Are you ascribing evil motives to me, too? Should "trolls" (that is, Substackers who disagree with you) be hung on the same gallows as Northrup, and along with Klaus Schwab, the British royal family, and the Rothschilds?