Levi paper showing Pfizer is a toxic vaccine is now published. And anyone claiming there is “nothing to see here” is intellectually dishonest.

The Florida Pfizer-Moderna mortality comparison paper by MIT Professor Retsef Levi is now published in the peer-reviewed literature. The paper shows it is highly likely the Pfizer shots were deadly.

Pfizer doesn’t want you to know this. This information doesn’t appear in any of their ads for the COVID vaccine for some reason. Baffling for sure!

Executive summary

The easiest way to tell if you are talking to someone who is intellectually honest about the COVID vaccines is to ask them for their assessment of the Levi paper.

If they claim, like UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris does, that there is nothing to see here, then you are dealing with someone who is intellectual dishonest. The AI analysis of Morris’s attack on the Levi paper is absolutely devastating.

What the paper found

37% higher non-COVID mortality in people who got Pfizer.

That’s a train wreck.

There is no other way to spin this.

Possible explanations for the results:

1. The Pfizer/Moderna groups weren’t really matched

2. Moderna reduces non-COVID all-cause mortality by 37%

The problems:

1. They were matched. Barbra Dickerman wrote 2 papers on COVID vaccines and VA data showing that crude demographic matching creates extremely good morbidity matching to nobody’s surprise. But Levi’s matching was MUCH stronger than what Dickerman did (more attributes and tighter matches). And he confirmed the matching by looking at the single most devastating statistic: prior cardiovascular hospitalization rates were matched. This is not a random marker — it's arguably the single most mortality-relevant clinical signal you can extract from administrative data. So we have no reason to believe the groups weren’t matched and every reason to believe they were.

2. There is no mechanism of action that could possibly explain how a COVID vaccine can reduce non-COVID all-cause mortality by 37%. If that were true, this would be the most amazing drug ever created. Moderna would be marketing their COVID vaccine as a fountain of youth. Everyone would be taking it. We’d have seen dramatic reduction in all cause mortality all over the world after rolling out the drug. No such data exists. If you plot cumulative COVID deaths over time for the world, the rollout of the vaccine didn’t change the slope one bit which means the COVID shots didn’t really save any lives. But people who opt to taking vaccines have lower mortality in general, but it is NOT caused by vaccines; it is 100% selection bias. People who opt for vaccines tend to have better access to healthcare.

The full discussion is here and it’s worth reading.

The bottom line

No two ways about it. The COVID vaccines were deadly.

They should be taken off the market.

It is absolutely appalling that businesses and schools forced people to take a vaccine that can increase mortality by 37%. But nobody is willing to talk about it, and no business has formally apologized for their mistake.

Those who want to talk about, like Professor Morris, cherry pick the evidence to support their point of view. These people are extremely dangerous. The AI analysis of Morris’s attack on the Levi paper is absolutely devastating.

Where is the outrage?

Every member of Congress should be shocked by this paper. They should be calling for replication of this study in all 50 states.

Don’t they want to know that they were responsible for over 500,000 American deaths?

Can you name one member of Congress doing that? With 535 members, you’d think that there would be at least one honest member speaking out asking for similar studies to be done, wouldn’t you?

Not one.

They don’t want to know.

Summary

The Levi paper is clear: 37% higher mortality if you got Pfizer.

None of the “explanations” can explain this difference.

Nobody is calling for more studies to replicate the Levi study.

And the Levi study was rejected by around 12 journals before being published showing you just how corrupt “science” is.