Guess I need to find a way to not be like Margaret Anna because most of my COMMENTS are long due to the information normally cannot be condensed into a short summary. Issue is that these issues I comment on are pet peeves and disturbing that our Government, our Government Agencies and some of our Medical Professionals have become mouth …
Guess I need to find a way to not be like Margaret Anna because most of my COMMENTS are long due to the information normally cannot be condensed into a short summary. Issue is that these issues I comment on are pet peeves and disturbing that our Government, our Government Agencies and some of our Medical Professionals have become mouth pieces of a ROGUE QUACK Dr. Fauci and an ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT BIDEN who continue to act like Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party of the 1930s and 1940s! Our Government Agencies the CDC, the FDA and others have chose to IGNORE the NUREMBERG CODE and are COOKING THE BOOKS concerning COVID DEATHS and refusing to report VACCINE DEATHS and SIDE EFFECTS accurately. Which the above two statements have ERODED THE PUBLICS TRUST. Then there is the QUESTION why the FDA has not STOP the USE of a EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE that does NOT WORK but it does cause a person's IMMUNE SYSTEM to be COMPROMISED (over 1,000 studies have proven this FACT). The COMMON SENSE ACTION since there are medications to cure COVID would be to HALT THE VACCINE and ALL MANDATES except when a patient has multiple medical issues.
Then the issue that Margaret Anna is discussing of UNVACCINATION (CONCENTRATION) CAMPS is a subject that should get EVERY AMERICAN pissed off! ALL REPRESENTATIVES, SENATORS AND GOVERNORS should receive MILLIONS of LETTERS DEMANDING that this not be considered as a alternative to fighting the COVID VIRUS. Then these SAME AMERICANS should send the SAME LETTER to their U.S. REPRESENTATIVE and SENATORS, but include the PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, ALL CABINET SECRETARIES and the SUPREME COURT. IF these folks get 150,000,000 LETTERS they might, let me restate that "THEY MIGHT TAKE NOTICE"!
Mock the Bible though some might, our laws are riddled with its good, common sense.
One excerpt from the Bible that comes to mind when confronted with educating people is, "[l]east ye become as children, you'll not inherit the kingdom." A reasonable take on this is, children are empty vessel and can be filled with truth or lies. We adults, young and old, must unlearn many of the lies pounded into our heads before we can replace what we thought we knew to be true with truth. A couple examples:
(1) You must seek permission from your agents in government to feed, cloth and shelter yourself and your family, either by working for someone else or by working for yourself (e.g., seek a Social Security Number and/or business license).
(2) You must seek government permission to establish and exercise your religious freedoms (e.g., incorporate).
(3) A license is a permission to do what is, without it, illegal, and you must seek permission to marry by way of a license (e.g., the first marriage license was issued to allow a couple to perform an illegal act - miscegenation).
I will NEVER EVER seek the permission of ANY GOVERNMENT official do DO ANYTHING! You are a bit of an extremist when it comes to the Bible IMHO. God gave us our RIGHTS! NOT the government. They government is ONLY here to PROTECT us from our enemies, foreign & Domestic. PERIOD. Seems to me that you need a refresher course in HISTORY! But this IS America & you are entitled to YOUR opinion as are the rest of us! Have a nice day!
Percey and Mookie, I have an understanding of both statements and appreciate both opinions. Percey, yes there are LICENSES we must obtain for MARRIAGE, for INCORPORATION, to Drive a Car, to Vote, etc. and Mookie, we have FREEDOMS and RIGHTS guaranteed to us by GOD. But as you mentioned HISTORY which defines what occurred before our LIFE TIME and the BIBLE is one of the BEST HISTORY BOOKS concern both WARS, CIVILIZATIONS of ACIENT TIMES but it explains GOD'S LAWS which DO NOT CHANGE.
The United States is know as a GREAT EXPERIMENT with many of the U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEED based in BIBLE LAW, one being FREEDOMS which MAN expanded upon to include RELIGION due to HISTORY of ANTI-RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS which caused may initial IMMIGRATE a path to ESCAPE RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION!
Percey, we have LAWS which require LINCENSES to allow for an orderly SOCIETY because Human's have be granted FREE WILL from our creator and for some weird reason Human's are sinners and many follow that LIFE STYLE and without LAWS does not allow for PEACEFUL ASSIMILATION into SOCIETY.
MOST not all of our LAWS have a foundation into BIBLICAL LAWS and others LAWS can easily be determined to be of a nature that denies GOD'S LAWS. We as Citizen's who have an UNDERSTANDING of the BIBLE or just a BASIC UNDERSTAND realize that the LAWS are in place so all can live in peace together instead of having TRIBAL WARS whenever LEADERSHIP CHANGES.
All reading is subject to an individuals' INTERPRETATION! Doctors read the same medical books yet interpret the same information differently! Joys of being a HUMAN! The same applies to the Bible, IMHO! I will always agree to disagree with EVERYONE who does not share my opinion as this IS STILL AMERICA & we are ENTITLED to each have our own free thinking MIND & OPINION! & Thank you, God, & our founders, for that!
Mookie, thanks, my thoughts exactly. It would be a very boring world if we all looked alike, talked alike, thought alike, etc. GOD made us individuals.
Add to ALL this the misrepresentations we hear about our laws and government every day. Hardly one goes by you don't hear some politician rambling about "this great democracy." A thing even the government described as the most sophisticated form of socialism known to man.
We hear people rambling about the central government, referring to the U.S., as if the tenth amendment and the other fifty constitutions don't exist and CONgress is our boss (though the LOPEZ case makes clear the tenth amendment and those other constitutions are real and do work as [partial] checks and balances against the feds and their ongoing attempts at overreach.
To the previous I would add, there are many examples of the people's agents gaming the system. Consider the example of traffic infractions.
Only a few decades ago, driving ten miles an hour over the speed limit on a long, lonely desert highway, like the ones around me, was a crime. Attorneys and other public officials convinced citizens they cared so much about them they would decriminalize such things so that they would no longer have a criminal traffic fine on their record.
What they NEVER mentioned was, no longer would you be judged by a jury of your peers, who would judge the facts. Instead, you'd be judged by a judge, who judged both the law and facts.
It was not mentioned that the judge saw his/her retirement grow with each fine.
It was not mentioned you would no longer be presumed innocent, and the government required to prove you guilty. Instead, you would have to do what, more often than not, was impossible - prove yourself innocent. Elsewhere in law this burden is frowned on for the obvious reason it is impossible in many instances.
Now, with infractions, there remains a presumption, which is, what the agent writing the ticket said is true. Back to that "prove your innocence" thing.
The coffers of cities and counties started filling up much quicker, with the people's new freedom from crime in their orderly society.
Bruce, many of the things of which you speak are more presumption than fact.
Not all licenses are exist, as you say, to insure an orderly society. Many times they are just another law purposed to collect taxes or to give more control to agents over their masters, such that they become the masters, rather than the servants.
Merely that people think everyone must seek a license to do this or that does not make it so. For example, common law marriages exist even in states where people are expected to obtain a license to marry. One reason is, states where licenses it's said you must have permission of the state to marry must honor the laws of other states, or those state will not have to honor theirs. Colorado recognizes common law marriages. If a couple reach that status there, then move to State of Washington, or they are still married under Washington laws.
Add to the foregoing the fact the federal government recognizes common law marriages.
From there we can go to case law. The courts have declared a couple believing they are lawfully married will be treated as such. In part, this is to avoid either of the two parties from being damaged by a loss of right if they were treated as not being married.
Again, keep in mind a license is a permission to do what is said to be illegal without it. From there, we can go to article one, section eleven of the Washington Constitution, where we will see that constitution guarantees our right to establish and exercise religion. For many, God ordained marriage. As I said, the common law, the state constitution, guarantees that right.
As to that not all laws are grounded in the Bible, that could have gone without saying. Take LICENSED civil marriages, versus ones before God as an example.
After a few decades in law, if nothing else, I've learned law is often not what people think it is.
Case law is replete with proofs that many laws agents of the people claimed to put in place are not laws at all. Take Dementia Joe's brag about gun free zones: Creepy Joe failed to mention they were ALL struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court (U.S. vs LOPEZ (1995) as never having been laws at all. As the court stated, schools have nothing to do with interstate commerce. The only authority under which CONgress could have enacted a law affecting one of the several, united states.
From the foregoing, it is obvious many laws are not put in place "[s]o all can live in peace together instead of having TRIBAL WARS whenever LEADERSHIP CHANGES." To the contrary, many are nothing more than extensions of political garbage. Our law reports and case files bear that fact out.
Of course, we were warned what would happen if we got our wish and ended up with kings, by whatever name called, in charge.
Percey, I respect your opinion and it appears we are not that far apart but there are some basic differences in our interpretations. I appears and sounds like your opinions come from the Legal Profession (i.e. - a Lawyer) while mine from a everyday U.S. Citizen that has lived in other countries for over 10 years during my 71 year stay here on GODS GREEN EARTH! When I compare how LAWS were enforced in those countries and how they are enforced in the U.S. has left me with one opinion, GIVE ME THE U.S.! You see I agree with you about many LICENSE being on in place to collect tax revenue. But many LICENSES are also there to prevent someone from PRACTICE SURGERY with ever going to MEDICAL SCHOOL and the MEDICAL LICENSE gives the patient a sense of confidence in his or her doctor. Just like a LAW LICENSE prevents a person from practicing LAW with adequate education in LAW. Therefore my belief is there are positives to LICENSING and there are times they should never be required. However I do believe LAWS allow for citizens of different cultures to assimilate into our society. The LAWS do not stop a CRIMINAL but when they are captured and prosecuted it gets them off of the street to protect the masses.
In my seventy years, I've only lived in foreign countries for a few of them. From that, I know not everything we are told about foreign countries and the U.S. are true. Even Russians, who we were trained were hard put upon by their Russian agents have freedoms we don't.
If we don't educate ourselves and, at the least, inform others on what we learn, the America we were told we have will keep dwindling away.
Take money and assets. Nearly every last career politician spends money like a drunken sailor. It's so bad our country in trillions in debt to those who are NOT our friends and only stay their hand because it benefits them.
Much of that money is given away to foreigners or aliens. Many outside out country, many within. Just like pyramid or Ponzi schemes, it cannot keep going.
As to licensing, merely that some are good does not make them all good, any more than with other laws.
There is NO license to practice surgery, or law. There are, howevere, business licenses, but they are just that, business licenses.
To practice law, you get a bar card from an entity which claims to be part of the judiciary. That agency claims to be exempt from disclosure laws, claiming judicial protections. However, that same agency conducts executive branch functions, such as going after those who practice law without a bar card.
Sadly, having a license does not make you a good marriage partner, a good doctor, or a good attorney. I know paralegals, for lack of a better name, who can stomp all over the average attorney building pleadings and things, or in court.
Practicing law, like much of medicine, is just a business. You have people who graduated at the top and the bottom of the class. You have people who can think and those who can only parrot.
In the end, our nation was built on distrust as much as it was on trust. Sadly, we have it pounded into our heads, during all our school years, to trust, rather than question.
Sadly, laws are only as good as the people making and enforcing them. More and more dangerous criminals are being let back onto the streets. On the other hand, profitable low fruit, less dangerous criminals put us in at or around first place in per capita incarcerations.
Sadly, our medicine is heavily influenced by profit. Remove censorship and it would be impossible to dispute that much of what is tied to covid is hogwash. Ivermectin does work, as do vitamins, herb and minerals, but those on high would ban even God's remedies, if they could, to promote for profit shots that have gained some trillions, and killed and injured many others.
SIDE NOTE: Merely that someone is a felon does not mean they are full on evil. I know a more than few. Several of them I would trust with my bank accounts and PINs.
Guess I need to find a way to not be like Margaret Anna because most of my COMMENTS are long due to the information normally cannot be condensed into a short summary. Issue is that these issues I comment on are pet peeves and disturbing that our Government, our Government Agencies and some of our Medical Professionals have become mouth pieces of a ROGUE QUACK Dr. Fauci and an ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT BIDEN who continue to act like Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party of the 1930s and 1940s! Our Government Agencies the CDC, the FDA and others have chose to IGNORE the NUREMBERG CODE and are COOKING THE BOOKS concerning COVID DEATHS and refusing to report VACCINE DEATHS and SIDE EFFECTS accurately. Which the above two statements have ERODED THE PUBLICS TRUST. Then there is the QUESTION why the FDA has not STOP the USE of a EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE that does NOT WORK but it does cause a person's IMMUNE SYSTEM to be COMPROMISED (over 1,000 studies have proven this FACT). The COMMON SENSE ACTION since there are medications to cure COVID would be to HALT THE VACCINE and ALL MANDATES except when a patient has multiple medical issues.
Then the issue that Margaret Anna is discussing of UNVACCINATION (CONCENTRATION) CAMPS is a subject that should get EVERY AMERICAN pissed off! ALL REPRESENTATIVES, SENATORS AND GOVERNORS should receive MILLIONS of LETTERS DEMANDING that this not be considered as a alternative to fighting the COVID VIRUS. Then these SAME AMERICANS should send the SAME LETTER to their U.S. REPRESENTATIVE and SENATORS, but include the PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, ALL CABINET SECRETARIES and the SUPREME COURT. IF these folks get 150,000,000 LETTERS they might, let me restate that "THEY MIGHT TAKE NOTICE"!
Well, did it again, I apologize for rambling.
Just my opinion.
Mock the Bible though some might, our laws are riddled with its good, common sense.
One excerpt from the Bible that comes to mind when confronted with educating people is, "[l]east ye become as children, you'll not inherit the kingdom." A reasonable take on this is, children are empty vessel and can be filled with truth or lies. We adults, young and old, must unlearn many of the lies pounded into our heads before we can replace what we thought we knew to be true with truth. A couple examples:
(1) You must seek permission from your agents in government to feed, cloth and shelter yourself and your family, either by working for someone else or by working for yourself (e.g., seek a Social Security Number and/or business license).
(2) You must seek government permission to establish and exercise your religious freedoms (e.g., incorporate).
(3) A license is a permission to do what is, without it, illegal, and you must seek permission to marry by way of a license (e.g., the first marriage license was issued to allow a couple to perform an illegal act - miscegenation).
. . . .
I will NEVER EVER seek the permission of ANY GOVERNMENT official do DO ANYTHING! You are a bit of an extremist when it comes to the Bible IMHO. God gave us our RIGHTS! NOT the government. They government is ONLY here to PROTECT us from our enemies, foreign & Domestic. PERIOD. Seems to me that you need a refresher course in HISTORY! But this IS America & you are entitled to YOUR opinion as are the rest of us! Have a nice day!
Percey and Mookie, I have an understanding of both statements and appreciate both opinions. Percey, yes there are LICENSES we must obtain for MARRIAGE, for INCORPORATION, to Drive a Car, to Vote, etc. and Mookie, we have FREEDOMS and RIGHTS guaranteed to us by GOD. But as you mentioned HISTORY which defines what occurred before our LIFE TIME and the BIBLE is one of the BEST HISTORY BOOKS concern both WARS, CIVILIZATIONS of ACIENT TIMES but it explains GOD'S LAWS which DO NOT CHANGE.
The United States is know as a GREAT EXPERIMENT with many of the U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEED based in BIBLE LAW, one being FREEDOMS which MAN expanded upon to include RELIGION due to HISTORY of ANTI-RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS which caused may initial IMMIGRATE a path to ESCAPE RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION!
Percey, we have LAWS which require LINCENSES to allow for an orderly SOCIETY because Human's have be granted FREE WILL from our creator and for some weird reason Human's are sinners and many follow that LIFE STYLE and without LAWS does not allow for PEACEFUL ASSIMILATION into SOCIETY.
MOST not all of our LAWS have a foundation into BIBLICAL LAWS and others LAWS can easily be determined to be of a nature that denies GOD'S LAWS. We as Citizen's who have an UNDERSTANDING of the BIBLE or just a BASIC UNDERSTAND realize that the LAWS are in place so all can live in peace together instead of having TRIBAL WARS whenever LEADERSHIP CHANGES.
Just my opinion.
All reading is subject to an individuals' INTERPRETATION! Doctors read the same medical books yet interpret the same information differently! Joys of being a HUMAN! The same applies to the Bible, IMHO! I will always agree to disagree with EVERYONE who does not share my opinion as this IS STILL AMERICA & we are ENTITLED to each have our own free thinking MIND & OPINION! & Thank you, God, & our founders, for that!
Mookie, thanks, my thoughts exactly. It would be a very boring world if we all looked alike, talked alike, thought alike, etc. GOD made us individuals.
Add to ALL this the misrepresentations we hear about our laws and government every day. Hardly one goes by you don't hear some politician rambling about "this great democracy." A thing even the government described as the most sophisticated form of socialism known to man.
We hear people rambling about the central government, referring to the U.S., as if the tenth amendment and the other fifty constitutions don't exist and CONgress is our boss (though the LOPEZ case makes clear the tenth amendment and those other constitutions are real and do work as [partial] checks and balances against the feds and their ongoing attempts at overreach.
To the previous I would add, there are many examples of the people's agents gaming the system. Consider the example of traffic infractions.
Only a few decades ago, driving ten miles an hour over the speed limit on a long, lonely desert highway, like the ones around me, was a crime. Attorneys and other public officials convinced citizens they cared so much about them they would decriminalize such things so that they would no longer have a criminal traffic fine on their record.
What they NEVER mentioned was, no longer would you be judged by a jury of your peers, who would judge the facts. Instead, you'd be judged by a judge, who judged both the law and facts.
It was not mentioned that the judge saw his/her retirement grow with each fine.
It was not mentioned you would no longer be presumed innocent, and the government required to prove you guilty. Instead, you would have to do what, more often than not, was impossible - prove yourself innocent. Elsewhere in law this burden is frowned on for the obvious reason it is impossible in many instances.
Now, with infractions, there remains a presumption, which is, what the agent writing the ticket said is true. Back to that "prove your innocence" thing.
The coffers of cities and counties started filling up much quicker, with the people's new freedom from crime in their orderly society.
Bruce, many of the things of which you speak are more presumption than fact.
Not all licenses are exist, as you say, to insure an orderly society. Many times they are just another law purposed to collect taxes or to give more control to agents over their masters, such that they become the masters, rather than the servants.
Merely that people think everyone must seek a license to do this or that does not make it so. For example, common law marriages exist even in states where people are expected to obtain a license to marry. One reason is, states where licenses it's said you must have permission of the state to marry must honor the laws of other states, or those state will not have to honor theirs. Colorado recognizes common law marriages. If a couple reach that status there, then move to State of Washington, or they are still married under Washington laws.
Add to the foregoing the fact the federal government recognizes common law marriages.
From there we can go to case law. The courts have declared a couple believing they are lawfully married will be treated as such. In part, this is to avoid either of the two parties from being damaged by a loss of right if they were treated as not being married.
Again, keep in mind a license is a permission to do what is said to be illegal without it. From there, we can go to article one, section eleven of the Washington Constitution, where we will see that constitution guarantees our right to establish and exercise religion. For many, God ordained marriage. As I said, the common law, the state constitution, guarantees that right.
As to that not all laws are grounded in the Bible, that could have gone without saying. Take LICENSED civil marriages, versus ones before God as an example.
After a few decades in law, if nothing else, I've learned law is often not what people think it is.
Case law is replete with proofs that many laws agents of the people claimed to put in place are not laws at all. Take Dementia Joe's brag about gun free zones: Creepy Joe failed to mention they were ALL struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court (U.S. vs LOPEZ (1995) as never having been laws at all. As the court stated, schools have nothing to do with interstate commerce. The only authority under which CONgress could have enacted a law affecting one of the several, united states.
From the foregoing, it is obvious many laws are not put in place "[s]o all can live in peace together instead of having TRIBAL WARS whenever LEADERSHIP CHANGES." To the contrary, many are nothing more than extensions of political garbage. Our law reports and case files bear that fact out.
Of course, we were warned what would happen if we got our wish and ended up with kings, by whatever name called, in charge.
Percey, I respect your opinion and it appears we are not that far apart but there are some basic differences in our interpretations. I appears and sounds like your opinions come from the Legal Profession (i.e. - a Lawyer) while mine from a everyday U.S. Citizen that has lived in other countries for over 10 years during my 71 year stay here on GODS GREEN EARTH! When I compare how LAWS were enforced in those countries and how they are enforced in the U.S. has left me with one opinion, GIVE ME THE U.S.! You see I agree with you about many LICENSE being on in place to collect tax revenue. But many LICENSES are also there to prevent someone from PRACTICE SURGERY with ever going to MEDICAL SCHOOL and the MEDICAL LICENSE gives the patient a sense of confidence in his or her doctor. Just like a LAW LICENSE prevents a person from practicing LAW with adequate education in LAW. Therefore my belief is there are positives to LICENSING and there are times they should never be required. However I do believe LAWS allow for citizens of different cultures to assimilate into our society. The LAWS do not stop a CRIMINAL but when they are captured and prosecuted it gets them off of the street to protect the masses.
In my seventy years, I've only lived in foreign countries for a few of them. From that, I know not everything we are told about foreign countries and the U.S. are true. Even Russians, who we were trained were hard put upon by their Russian agents have freedoms we don't.
If we don't educate ourselves and, at the least, inform others on what we learn, the America we were told we have will keep dwindling away.
Take money and assets. Nearly every last career politician spends money like a drunken sailor. It's so bad our country in trillions in debt to those who are NOT our friends and only stay their hand because it benefits them.
Much of that money is given away to foreigners or aliens. Many outside out country, many within. Just like pyramid or Ponzi schemes, it cannot keep going.
As to licensing, merely that some are good does not make them all good, any more than with other laws.
There is NO license to practice surgery, or law. There are, howevere, business licenses, but they are just that, business licenses.
To practice law, you get a bar card from an entity which claims to be part of the judiciary. That agency claims to be exempt from disclosure laws, claiming judicial protections. However, that same agency conducts executive branch functions, such as going after those who practice law without a bar card.
Sadly, having a license does not make you a good marriage partner, a good doctor, or a good attorney. I know paralegals, for lack of a better name, who can stomp all over the average attorney building pleadings and things, or in court.
Practicing law, like much of medicine, is just a business. You have people who graduated at the top and the bottom of the class. You have people who can think and those who can only parrot.
In the end, our nation was built on distrust as much as it was on trust. Sadly, we have it pounded into our heads, during all our school years, to trust, rather than question.
Sadly, laws are only as good as the people making and enforcing them. More and more dangerous criminals are being let back onto the streets. On the other hand, profitable low fruit, less dangerous criminals put us in at or around first place in per capita incarcerations.
Sadly, our medicine is heavily influenced by profit. Remove censorship and it would be impossible to dispute that much of what is tied to covid is hogwash. Ivermectin does work, as do vitamins, herb and minerals, but those on high would ban even God's remedies, if they could, to promote for profit shots that have gained some trillions, and killed and injured many others.
SIDE NOTE: Merely that someone is a felon does not mean they are full on evil. I know a more than few. Several of them I would trust with my bank accounts and PINs.