AI led me astray earlier in the KCOR design process. I realized yesterday AI was wrong, so I redesigned the algorithm today and the implementation worked the first time I ran it. This is so awesome.
It doesn't take statistical models to prove the COVID shots are killing people. You put toxic substances like graphene oxide in people and they will die. The fact-checkers will say otherwise but we have the receipts. I also have multiple other sources. Former Pfizer patent expert Karen Kingston also says the COVID shot has graphene oxide going back as early as Nov. 2021.
The FDA had to be sued to confirm that toxic graphene oxide was used in the COVID shot. Here is an article published in BlackListedNews.com on 29 Sept. 2023 titled, 'FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court'.
This article is archived in the WayBackMachine at the following address
You cant use Chat GPT for anything like google that has a political tinge on it especially anything to do with the Vax or medical in general.Have tried Archangel and was pleasantly surprised although that was my first try.Steve just ploughs on against the retards ,like Hotez they need to eventually be brought to book for their lies.
AI is often very wrong. Almost as if someone is taking the piss. Almost nasty? Probably not, but I can see how this could be developed to harm people. I would think you of all people understand this Steve.
Congratulations Steve Kirsch. Excellent to see and independent, fist rank, ethically oriented, intellectual, doing real science on an urgent, but difficult, problem. The more your analysis is met with silence the more truthful it must be. Has Paul Offit Got back yet? I expect he prefers telling polite camera men to "F off" than giving millions to those in need to debate what be claims, but will not defend, he believes. Can you get your analysis into some top journal or other? Something tells me you just redesigned statistical analysis of epidemiological data sets the way it is supposed to done to actually reveal the truth.
The first graph. It says d1/d0 and d2/d0. It means that you are comparing those who took one dose to the ones who took zero. And two doses compared to zero doses. Two doses has a higher mortality than one dose. As long as the Y axis is above 1 - both of them are more dangerous than zero doses.
Is this the Czech dataset?
I am confused when it comes to the > 15 weeks window. We are outside the harm window. Is that really so? Why do we (still) have excess deaths? Cancer, cardio problems. The Japanese study that showed increased risk of dying for about 240 days.
Anyways. Thanks again for what you do. Impressive work.
Out bloody standing … take a bow Steve Kirsch, mate… you’ve cracked it, even the A.I LLM concurs, in fact states the same, the greatest takeaway being it is so hard to refute… let the cloned doppelgängers science deniers say otherwise… slowly, slowly with each reveal, each insightful tweak, every twist irrespective how slight you are destroying their well planned fallacious arguments and reasonings, the panic now building amongst this denizen of frauds, thieves, greedy inhumane arseholes, must be palpable, indeed as we would say down here in the antipodes, “their sphincter sweat and twitch will be all but tripping the lights fantastic at a rate that would shame Elvis with his masterful on stage gyrations”.
I would love to be a fly on the wall privy to their calls, you can imagine the panic, their keyboards going into overdrive, shades I bet of the activity during that initial coverup phase… you’ll recall the coverup that came to light that was discovered undertaken between those involved NIAID, ECO Health Alliance as those involved gave birth to the initial coverup, the Wuhan link… but as noted with each breakthrough completed by you such as confirmed this Substack post, their world gets ever smaller… yep, sure as shit their walls are closing in on them… Mate, again congratulations and so very well done…. Just saying
Let's get the findings peer-reviewed and published, next. Perhaps the HHS Secretary can help with that, since he does wield considerable power in both the political, bureaucratic and scientific spaces, should he be willing to use it.
*** COVID shot contains toxic GRAPHENE OXIDE ****
It doesn't take statistical models to prove the COVID shots are killing people. You put toxic substances like graphene oxide in people and they will die. The fact-checkers will say otherwise but we have the receipts. I also have multiple other sources. Former Pfizer patent expert Karen Kingston also says the COVID shot has graphene oxide going back as early as Nov. 2021.
The FDA had to be sued to confirm that toxic graphene oxide was used in the COVID shot. Here is an article published in BlackListedNews.com on 29 Sept. 2023 titled, 'FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court'.
This article is archived in the WayBackMachine at the following address
https://web.archive.org/web/20230715204353/https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/85118/fda-confirms-graphene-oxide-is-in-the-mrna-covid19-vaccines-after-being-forced-to-publish.html
Stew Peters Show | Former Pfizer Employee Confirms ‘Vaccine’ is POISON | Interview w/ Karen Kingston
_____________________________________
https://rumble.com/v146wdq-former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-in-covid-vaccine-by-stew-peters-show.html
This is why you are the brilliant mind that made this mouse on my desk, and I'm just the dope who exchanged some dollars to obtain and use it.
You cant use Chat GPT for anything like google that has a political tinge on it especially anything to do with the Vax or medical in general.Have tried Archangel and was pleasantly surprised although that was my first try.Steve just ploughs on against the retards ,like Hotez they need to eventually be brought to book for their lies.
AI is often very wrong. Almost as if someone is taking the piss. Almost nasty? Probably not, but I can see how this could be developed to harm people. I would think you of all people understand this Steve.
Congratulations Steve Kirsch. Excellent to see and independent, fist rank, ethically oriented, intellectual, doing real science on an urgent, but difficult, problem. The more your analysis is met with silence the more truthful it must be. Has Paul Offit Got back yet? I expect he prefers telling polite camera men to "F off" than giving millions to those in need to debate what be claims, but will not defend, he believes. Can you get your analysis into some top journal or other? Something tells me you just redesigned statistical analysis of epidemiological data sets the way it is supposed to done to actually reveal the truth.
Thanks a lot. I am trying to understand this.
The first graph. It says d1/d0 and d2/d0. It means that you are comparing those who took one dose to the ones who took zero. And two doses compared to zero doses. Two doses has a higher mortality than one dose. As long as the Y axis is above 1 - both of them are more dangerous than zero doses.
Is this the Czech dataset?
I am confused when it comes to the > 15 weeks window. We are outside the harm window. Is that really so? Why do we (still) have excess deaths? Cancer, cardio problems. The Japanese study that showed increased risk of dying for about 240 days.
Anyways. Thanks again for what you do. Impressive work.
Out bloody standing … take a bow Steve Kirsch, mate… you’ve cracked it, even the A.I LLM concurs, in fact states the same, the greatest takeaway being it is so hard to refute… let the cloned doppelgängers science deniers say otherwise… slowly, slowly with each reveal, each insightful tweak, every twist irrespective how slight you are destroying their well planned fallacious arguments and reasonings, the panic now building amongst this denizen of frauds, thieves, greedy inhumane arseholes, must be palpable, indeed as we would say down here in the antipodes, “their sphincter sweat and twitch will be all but tripping the lights fantastic at a rate that would shame Elvis with his masterful on stage gyrations”.
I would love to be a fly on the wall privy to their calls, you can imagine the panic, their keyboards going into overdrive, shades I bet of the activity during that initial coverup phase… you’ll recall the coverup that came to light that was discovered undertaken between those involved NIAID, ECO Health Alliance as those involved gave birth to the initial coverup, the Wuhan link… but as noted with each breakthrough completed by you such as confirmed this Substack post, their world gets ever smaller… yep, sure as shit their walls are closing in on them… Mate, again congratulations and so very well done…. Just saying
Kia Kaha (Stay strong) From New Zealand
Congratulations on the new model.
Let's get the findings peer-reviewed and published, next. Perhaps the HHS Secretary can help with that, since he does wield considerable power in both the political, bureaucratic and scientific spaces, should he be willing to use it.
You always impress me how you see things others do not. Need another word above brilliant.