It’s astonishing how readily people dismiss high multiples of athlete sudden death vs prior years.
There’s no plausible alternative explanation than vaccine injury.
The one I think I’m seeing at work in a pt is neuro. Poor guy. Of course it could be random. Others have had this condition. Before 2020. But it’s the increasing numbers of odd somewhat rare conditions.
I had someone yell over Christmas dinner, "Why do you dismiss the TV news but believe the internet?" without seeming to realize that the TV "news" is promulgated by journalists with degrees in journalism whereas the "internet" articles are written by scientists and physicians with advanced degrees and impressive medical and scientific resumes. Good grief!
Dr.Yeadon, could you provide us the accurate numbers? I read that FIFA had 100 cardiac evens last year compared with 5 in an average year, but I can't verify it Then, another source quoted 186 events in which a little over 100 died. Thank you, and it's great to see you weighing in here.
Ask Dr Jessica Rose where she got it. I think the figure was one she had and she seems to meticulously research statistics. I think she eats stats for lunch. I believe I was the one to repost her figures here. But I didn’t look up a source. I truly think she had a source. It wasn’t off the cuff. Or a guess.
There probably isn’t a single, reliable source, either, because such work will be actively discouraged by the perpetrators.
If I was writing this up, I’d have to message people I knew & also go hunting online.
A serious problem is that browsers aren’t a reliable guide to evidence any longer.
Just like 1984, the passed is in sone domains being edited, or at very least, browser search results tampered with, so that you won’t be able to find out.
Pretty sure I saw a Substack article showing the browser search result sabotage only recently.
I’m no longer planning to trust a single official statistic. In fact, if it’s official, it’s almost certainly untrustworthy. We’ve been systematically lied to for over two & it’s not stopped.
Yes, I'm skeptical. The CDC, FDA, WHO and the various committees different countries have set up to advise governments, have been wrong on almost every major call. The Infection Fatality Rate, mask mandates in adults, mask mandates in children, lockdowns, school closures, needing 90% of the population vaccinated to get herd immunity, saying the vaccine protects you better than getting and recovering from the disease, the vaccine preventing transmission, the virus originating from zoonotic spillover, etc. you know them, Mike, better than anyone. Someone asked me on the interrnet in April of 2020, "Why should we believe you over the CDC?". I answered, "Because they've been wrong about everything and I've been right." By then, I had already made a post about how the virus had to have been created in a lab, calculated the correct IFR (they had it about 40x too high at 4%), figured out that lockdowns could not work (I did this in March before they were instituted and wrote 2 FOX and 2 CNN hosts on March 17 asking them to let me explain why)- no answer to my emails-, explained why masks wouldn't work and corrected the experts on a few other small things.
Thank heavens for that! You were clearly alert very early either to the potential for fraud, either perhaps because you had seen incompetence (or worse) at these three letter agencies, or alternatively, you’d detected inconsistencies in the official information.
I was alerted on the latter, when the projections from Imperial college were published & the chief medical officer & chief scientific advisor to the U.K. government started adopting downright weird positivism on the characteristics of the alleged event in Wuhan.
It’s astonishing how readily people dismiss high multiples of athlete sudden death vs prior years.
There’s no plausible alternative explanation than vaccine injury.
The one I think I’m seeing at work in a pt is neuro. Poor guy. Of course it could be random. Others have had this condition. Before 2020. But it’s the increasing numbers of odd somewhat rare conditions.
I had someone yell over Christmas dinner, "Why do you dismiss the TV news but believe the internet?" without seeming to realize that the TV "news" is promulgated by journalists with degrees in journalism whereas the "internet" articles are written by scientists and physicians with advanced degrees and impressive medical and scientific resumes. Good grief!
Dr.Yeadon, could you provide us the accurate numbers? I read that FIFA had 100 cardiac evens last year compared with 5 in an average year, but I can't verify it Then, another source quoted 186 events in which a little over 100 died. Thank you, and it's great to see you weighing in here.
Ask Dr Jessica Rose where she got it. I think the figure was one she had and she seems to meticulously research statistics. I think she eats stats for lunch. I believe I was the one to repost her figures here. But I didn’t look up a source. I truly think she had a source. It wasn’t off the cuff. Or a guess.
Reid,
I’m afraid I don’t have the authentic numbers.
There probably isn’t a single, reliable source, either, because such work will be actively discouraged by the perpetrators.
If I was writing this up, I’d have to message people I knew & also go hunting online.
A serious problem is that browsers aren’t a reliable guide to evidence any longer.
Just like 1984, the passed is in sone domains being edited, or at very least, browser search results tampered with, so that you won’t be able to find out.
Pretty sure I saw a Substack article showing the browser search result sabotage only recently.
OK thank you very much, Mike. I'll be extra careful with what I find.
You sound sceptical, perhaps?
I’m no longer planning to trust a single official statistic. In fact, if it’s official, it’s almost certainly untrustworthy. We’ve been systematically lied to for over two & it’s not stopped.
Yes, I'm skeptical. The CDC, FDA, WHO and the various committees different countries have set up to advise governments, have been wrong on almost every major call. The Infection Fatality Rate, mask mandates in adults, mask mandates in children, lockdowns, school closures, needing 90% of the population vaccinated to get herd immunity, saying the vaccine protects you better than getting and recovering from the disease, the vaccine preventing transmission, the virus originating from zoonotic spillover, etc. you know them, Mike, better than anyone. Someone asked me on the interrnet in April of 2020, "Why should we believe you over the CDC?". I answered, "Because they've been wrong about everything and I've been right." By then, I had already made a post about how the virus had to have been created in a lab, calculated the correct IFR (they had it about 40x too high at 4%), figured out that lockdowns could not work (I did this in March before they were instituted and wrote 2 FOX and 2 CNN hosts on March 17 asking them to let me explain why)- no answer to my emails-, explained why masks wouldn't work and corrected the experts on a few other small things.
Skeptical? Yes, I'm skeptical.
Thank heavens for that! You were clearly alert very early either to the potential for fraud, either perhaps because you had seen incompetence (or worse) at these three letter agencies, or alternatively, you’d detected inconsistencies in the official information.
I was alerted on the latter, when the projections from Imperial college were published & the chief medical officer & chief scientific advisor to the U.K. government started adopting downright weird positivism on the characteristics of the alleged event in Wuhan.
Thank you for having interceded early.