It’s hard to “like” comments like this. But when the naysayers are , even now, saying they haven’t heard of any adverse events when we’ve been trying to bring them to light and they’ve been dismissed time and again as “rare” or “conspiracy theories” or (as a CLOSE relative actually told me “you and (the other family member who is anti va…
It’s hard to “like” comments like this. But when the naysayers are , even now, saying they haven’t heard of any adverse events when we’ve been trying to bring them to light and they’ve been dismissed time and again as “rare” or “conspiracy theories” or (as a CLOSE relative actually told me “you and (the other family member who is anti vac) need to stop getting your information from the internet” and then she sends me the propaganda from her pediatrician (she was considering vaccine her 10 year old who I adore). BTW the pediatricians info (courtesy of CDC and the American Pediatrics Association or whatever their group is called) is on the internet so I guess that’s no good huh?
I believe I was writing an incredibly long run on sentence above. But what I was saying is : when that’s the opposition we face, the only logic they may see is deaths, serious adverse events.
I’m a HCW. Not sure but think my Senior doc is seeing an AE right now. I will keep my counsel to myself for now but.... things like this may be the only thing that convinced many.
The one I think I’m seeing at work in a pt is neuro. Poor guy. Of course it could be random. Others have had this condition. Before 2020. But it’s the increasing numbers of odd somewhat rare conditions.
I had someone yell over Christmas dinner, "Why do you dismiss the TV news but believe the internet?" without seeming to realize that the TV "news" is promulgated by journalists with degrees in journalism whereas the "internet" articles are written by scientists and physicians with advanced degrees and impressive medical and scientific resumes. Good grief!
Dr.Yeadon, could you provide us the accurate numbers? I read that FIFA had 100 cardiac evens last year compared with 5 in an average year, but I can't verify it Then, another source quoted 186 events in which a little over 100 died. Thank you, and it's great to see you weighing in here.
Ask Dr Jessica Rose where she got it. I think the figure was one she had and she seems to meticulously research statistics. I think she eats stats for lunch. I believe I was the one to repost her figures here. But I didn’t look up a source. I truly think she had a source. It wasn’t off the cuff. Or a guess.
There probably isn’t a single, reliable source, either, because such work will be actively discouraged by the perpetrators.
If I was writing this up, I’d have to message people I knew & also go hunting online.
A serious problem is that browsers aren’t a reliable guide to evidence any longer.
Just like 1984, the passed is in sone domains being edited, or at very least, browser search results tampered with, so that you won’t be able to find out.
Pretty sure I saw a Substack article showing the browser search result sabotage only recently.
I’m no longer planning to trust a single official statistic. In fact, if it’s official, it’s almost certainly untrustworthy. We’ve been systematically lied to for over two & it’s not stopped.
Yes, I'm skeptical. The CDC, FDA, WHO and the various committees different countries have set up to advise governments, have been wrong on almost every major call. The Infection Fatality Rate, mask mandates in adults, mask mandates in children, lockdowns, school closures, needing 90% of the population vaccinated to get herd immunity, saying the vaccine protects you better than getting and recovering from the disease, the vaccine preventing transmission, the virus originating from zoonotic spillover, etc. you know them, Mike, better than anyone. Someone asked me on the interrnet in April of 2020, "Why should we believe you over the CDC?". I answered, "Because they've been wrong about everything and I've been right." By then, I had already made a post about how the virus had to have been created in a lab, calculated the correct IFR (they had it about 40x too high at 4%), figured out that lockdowns could not work (I did this in March before they were instituted and wrote 2 FOX and 2 CNN hosts on March 17 asking them to let me explain why)- no answer to my emails-, explained why masks wouldn't work and corrected the experts on a few other small things.
It’s hard to “like” comments like this. But when the naysayers are , even now, saying they haven’t heard of any adverse events when we’ve been trying to bring them to light and they’ve been dismissed time and again as “rare” or “conspiracy theories” or (as a CLOSE relative actually told me “you and (the other family member who is anti vac) need to stop getting your information from the internet” and then she sends me the propaganda from her pediatrician (she was considering vaccine her 10 year old who I adore). BTW the pediatricians info (courtesy of CDC and the American Pediatrics Association or whatever their group is called) is on the internet so I guess that’s no good huh?
I believe I was writing an incredibly long run on sentence above. But what I was saying is : when that’s the opposition we face, the only logic they may see is deaths, serious adverse events.
I’m a HCW. Not sure but think my Senior doc is seeing an AE right now. I will keep my counsel to myself for now but.... things like this may be the only thing that convinced many.
It’s astonishing how readily people dismiss high multiples of athlete sudden death vs prior years.
There’s no plausible alternative explanation than vaccine injury.
The one I think I’m seeing at work in a pt is neuro. Poor guy. Of course it could be random. Others have had this condition. Before 2020. But it’s the increasing numbers of odd somewhat rare conditions.
I had someone yell over Christmas dinner, "Why do you dismiss the TV news but believe the internet?" without seeming to realize that the TV "news" is promulgated by journalists with degrees in journalism whereas the "internet" articles are written by scientists and physicians with advanced degrees and impressive medical and scientific resumes. Good grief!
Dr.Yeadon, could you provide us the accurate numbers? I read that FIFA had 100 cardiac evens last year compared with 5 in an average year, but I can't verify it Then, another source quoted 186 events in which a little over 100 died. Thank you, and it's great to see you weighing in here.
Ask Dr Jessica Rose where she got it. I think the figure was one she had and she seems to meticulously research statistics. I think she eats stats for lunch. I believe I was the one to repost her figures here. But I didn’t look up a source. I truly think she had a source. It wasn’t off the cuff. Or a guess.
Reid,
I’m afraid I don’t have the authentic numbers.
There probably isn’t a single, reliable source, either, because such work will be actively discouraged by the perpetrators.
If I was writing this up, I’d have to message people I knew & also go hunting online.
A serious problem is that browsers aren’t a reliable guide to evidence any longer.
Just like 1984, the passed is in sone domains being edited, or at very least, browser search results tampered with, so that you won’t be able to find out.
Pretty sure I saw a Substack article showing the browser search result sabotage only recently.
OK thank you very much, Mike. I'll be extra careful with what I find.
You sound sceptical, perhaps?
I’m no longer planning to trust a single official statistic. In fact, if it’s official, it’s almost certainly untrustworthy. We’ve been systematically lied to for over two & it’s not stopped.
Yes, I'm skeptical. The CDC, FDA, WHO and the various committees different countries have set up to advise governments, have been wrong on almost every major call. The Infection Fatality Rate, mask mandates in adults, mask mandates in children, lockdowns, school closures, needing 90% of the population vaccinated to get herd immunity, saying the vaccine protects you better than getting and recovering from the disease, the vaccine preventing transmission, the virus originating from zoonotic spillover, etc. you know them, Mike, better than anyone. Someone asked me on the interrnet in April of 2020, "Why should we believe you over the CDC?". I answered, "Because they've been wrong about everything and I've been right." By then, I had already made a post about how the virus had to have been created in a lab, calculated the correct IFR (they had it about 40x too high at 4%), figured out that lockdowns could not work (I did this in March before they were instituted and wrote 2 FOX and 2 CNN hosts on March 17 asking them to let me explain why)- no answer to my emails-, explained why masks wouldn't work and corrected the experts on a few other small things.
Skeptical? Yes, I'm skeptical.