Your pointless question? My answer would mean nothing to you. We're not talking about me. We're talking about Yeadon. You switching the topic is a pivot to an ad hominem. Not playing your game.
At what point in this lengthy interview does Yeadon elaborate on the evidence he referred to? It's quite boring and I haven't heard anything I care about.
He's a former VP of Pfizer who earned some trust by telling us the truth, and for some reason is lying to us now. I have none of this impression that he is genuine. He seems rather mad. Apart from his work at Pfizer, and his many hysterical statements which in retrospect seem like provocation agency, what do you know about his character? All you see is a man on the screen and words on a page.
I mean, why is Yeadon an expert? He's a virologist. But virology is bunk. So he isn't a damn expert in anything. Or am I missing something? He's admitting that he's been fooled his entire career. If he's being honest, he also is disqualifying himself. Yeadon is debunking Yeadon.
Who, exactly, are you and what agency do you work for? Is Gunnels the captain?
How long have you been tossing around credentialing litmus tests and non sequiturs in lieu of providing actual statements in support of your "views"?
So you are not going to answer?
Your pointless question? My answer would mean nothing to you. We're not talking about me. We're talking about Yeadon. You switching the topic is a pivot to an ad hominem. Not playing your game.
At what point in this lengthy interview does Yeadon elaborate on the evidence he referred to? It's quite boring and I haven't heard anything I care about.
You have zero credbility on these matters. You made some rather appalling accusations against someone you know nothing about. You attacked this man.
You know even less about the topic. That's something you don't want to reveal.
Michael Yeadon is a genuine, humble human being who has come a long way and sacrificed more than you ever would- someone with courage.
You can't hold this guys jockstrap.
Yes, an ad hominem. But no answer.
He's a former VP of Pfizer who earned some trust by telling us the truth, and for some reason is lying to us now. I have none of this impression that he is genuine. He seems rather mad. Apart from his work at Pfizer, and his many hysterical statements which in retrospect seem like provocation agency, what do you know about his character? All you see is a man on the screen and words on a page.
I mean, why is Yeadon an expert? He's a virologist. But virology is bunk. So he isn't a damn expert in anything. Or am I missing something? He's admitting that he's been fooled his entire career. If he's being honest, he also is disqualifying himself. Yeadon is debunking Yeadon.
Who, exactly, are you and what agency do you work for? Is Gunnels the captain?