thanks. I tried to speak to Mike about it, but he wouldn't discuss.
I just sent him this on whatsapp:
OK, clearly you're siding with Kaufman. Are you open to a recorded discussion about it? If you're right, you'll persuade hundreds of thousands of people. If you're wrong, nothing will happen. So it's a "no risk" opportunity to be heard. What do you think?
thanks. I tried to speak to Mike about it, but he wouldn't discuss.
I just sent him this on whatsapp:
OK, clearly you're siding with Kaufman. Are you open to a recorded discussion about it? If you're right, you'll persuade hundreds of thousands of people. If you're wrong, nothing will happen. So it's a "no risk" opportunity to be heard. What do you think?
He's lost his mind or is involved in a disinfo campaign. Hard to know. Steve, this "virus denial" meme feels like it's coming from the military. Gunnels, who trolled me in your comments, definitely feels like a military agent. He's not stupid. But he seems very sure of ideas which make no sense. Is this a domestic psy-ops excercise?
They come on hard with an army of socks, resort to ad hominems and radio silence, and generally seem out to disrupt discussions like early treatment, natural immunity, and lab origin. There is an obvious motive to cut off these relevant topics by luring truth-seekers into nihilism.
You are probably aware of this possibility, but there is something very wrong here. Be careful of these people, this does not seem like an organic movement.
Your pointless question? My answer would mean nothing to you. We're not talking about me. We're talking about Yeadon. You switching the topic is a pivot to an ad hominem. Not playing your game.
At what point in this lengthy interview does Yeadon elaborate on the evidence he referred to? It's quite boring and I haven't heard anything I care about.
maybe Mike Y could just clue us in as to what is this "new bit of information" he learned recently that "collapsed" in his mind the possibility that respiratory viruses exist at all as previously described, so that we could all assess it for ourselves? I don't want to challenge him to prove something.. just ask him sincerely what is the new information going into his synthesis?
thanks. I tried to speak to Mike about it, but he wouldn't discuss.
I just sent him this on whatsapp:
OK, clearly you're siding with Kaufman. Are you open to a recorded discussion about it? If you're right, you'll persuade hundreds of thousands of people. If you're wrong, nothing will happen. So it's a "no risk" opportunity to be heard. What do you think?
He's lost his mind or is involved in a disinfo campaign. Hard to know. Steve, this "virus denial" meme feels like it's coming from the military. Gunnels, who trolled me in your comments, definitely feels like a military agent. He's not stupid. But he seems very sure of ideas which make no sense. Is this a domestic psy-ops excercise?
They come on hard with an army of socks, resort to ad hominems and radio silence, and generally seem out to disrupt discussions like early treatment, natural immunity, and lab origin. There is an obvious motive to cut off these relevant topics by luring truth-seekers into nihilism.
You are probably aware of this possibility, but there is something very wrong here. Be careful of these people, this does not seem like an organic movement.
Have you listened to the entire interview? It's here:
https://twitter.com/KPCResearch/status/1554807365257543680?cxt=HHwWgICyxfPD5JMrAAAA
Tell me what you know of Kevin Corbett's work.
How long have you been involved in the health freedom movement?
What was your first experience with "pandemics?" What year and which "crisis" opened your eyes to these frauds?
How long have you been tossing around credentialing litmus tests and non sequiturs in lieu of providing actual statements in support of your "views"?
So you are not going to answer?
Your pointless question? My answer would mean nothing to you. We're not talking about me. We're talking about Yeadon. You switching the topic is a pivot to an ad hominem. Not playing your game.
At what point in this lengthy interview does Yeadon elaborate on the evidence he referred to? It's quite boring and I haven't heard anything I care about.
You have zero credbility on these matters. You made some rather appalling accusations against someone you know nothing about. You attacked this man.
You know even less about the topic. That's something you don't want to reveal.
Michael Yeadon is a genuine, humble human being who has come a long way and sacrificed more than you ever would- someone with courage.
You can't hold this guys jockstrap.
maybe Mike Y could just clue us in as to what is this "new bit of information" he learned recently that "collapsed" in his mind the possibility that respiratory viruses exist at all as previously described, so that we could all assess it for ourselves? I don't want to challenge him to prove something.. just ask him sincerely what is the new information going into his synthesis?
It is really odd that he would drop that bomb with no substantiation whatsoever...