We have the data from the Czech Republic. It shows to prove safety, we'd need to enroll 7.5M young adults in an RCT and observe them for a year. Without that, recommending a vaccine is unethical.
Exactly. Its shocking that they are still suggesting our most vulnerable get this. Elders and people with comorbidities are MOST susceptible to vaccine injury, yet they are still suggesting they get it! Knowing it doesnt stop people from getting sick anyway. Unreal.
If your vaccine works, you don't need to worry about whether or not anyone else has taken it. If your vaccine does not work, you don't need to worry about whether or not someone else has taken it and you should be focused on why you took it. Mandates are unneeded and immoral.
Agreed. What is sad is I was interviewing a doctor for my kids and she said she required all children to get the Covid injection, even thought both are documented as having had it and had no real issue. I told her that I trust science and if she had a large cohort RCT I would like to read it. She then stood up and said she did not think she would like to have my kids as patients.
Son todos unos SÁTRAPAS y GENOCIDAS SERIALES. Nos llamaban CONSPIRANOICOS a quienes objetábamos, dudábamos o cuestionábamos todo el TERRORISMO SANITARIO implementado a partir de 2020 y, en realidad, ELLOS (MÉDICOS, POLÍTICOS y EXPERTOS EN NADA) fueron los verdaderos CONSPIRADORES. No tienen PERDÓN y deberían ser SANCIONADOS por TRIBUNALES ÉTICOS INTERNACIONALES.
Translation: "They are all SATRAPS and SERIAL GENOCIDALS. They called us CONSPIRATORS, those of us who objected, doubted or questioned all the HEALTH TERRORISM implemented from 2020 onwards and, in reality, THEY (MEDICIANS, POLITICIANS and EXPERTS IN NOTHING) were the real CONSPIRATORS. They have no FORGIVENESS and should be SANCTIONED by INTERNATIONAL ETHICAL COURTS."
Bet you don't know that a banking crisis began on September 17, 2019. The Federal Reserve secretly funneled nearly $20 trillion into Wall Street megabanks to save them from crashing. The next banking crisis began in March 2020 and was blamed on the fake COVID "pandemic." The Fed used the same emergency lending programs that it had used for the 2008 crisis, known as the "global financial crisis" (GFC). The COVID-era banking crisis is mostly absent from the mainstream media, which blames COVID for all the problems of that era. The COVID "pandemic" served as a cover to prevent the public from knowing that there was the potential for another catastrophic financial crisis. Partially from the Wall Street On Parade article "The Fund Created to Unwind a Failing Megabank Has a Problem: There's No Money in it."
I agree with you there. I always try to write as fact-based and truthful as possible and avoid assumptions. As a result, I am certainly sometimes too weak in my criticism. But to be clear, I believe there is now no doubt that Covid crimes are not incompetence, but malice.
Vaxx for children are as effective as killing minors in Gaza: just prevent the next generation from ever happening ...
The mass-killers are preparing the next plandemic because most sheeple are too gullible, conformist and unable to see what is developing in front of their very eyes.
The %age of people who could be able to incite a REAL backlash is far to low to even scare these demons ...
The Covid creeps have created a cult that most of the population believed in and maybe still does. It is very difficult to get rid of a pervasive cult. You have to admit the group of psychopaths who orchestrated this experience are actually pretty brilliant.
Four years ago VRBPAC met to decide whether to expand the Covid jabs from 11yr olds to 5 yr olds. I sent a comment letter to them making similar points to those in this post: The risks far outweigh any questionable benefit. At a minimum these kids should be tested to see if they already have naturally acquired immunity which would obviate the need for an experimental injection that would put them at risk for serious harm or even death. Despite the clear evidence to the contrary, the committee rubber stamped the expansion to 5 yr olds. When one of the distinguished experts on the committee was asked why they voted to do this, his answer was mind blowing. This from Gemini AI:
Dr. Rubin, an editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine and a member of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), made this comment during a discussion regarding the authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5 to 11.
The Quote: "We're never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That's just the way it goes. That's how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like the rotavirus vaccine," he said before voting to authorize the vaccine for that age group.
"Summary: Nobody has admitted they goofed." Because nobody did. It's not difficult to understand that those that developed these products knew exactly what they were doing. Because they also knew they could control the narrative via institutional takeover (regulators, professional organizations, the media etc.) they just steamrolled ahead. Everyone else just fell in line and if you dared not to you were simply pushed aside or crushed. No comedy of errors involved.
Exactly. They could have easily made up some concoction that would fool everyone into believing it was saving their life.... without harming anyone. And everyone would have just continued to take it for the rest of their lives thinking theyd be dead without it. They didnt. People ARE being harmed and they are covering it up and lying about it. Therefore it HAS to be intentional.
Indeed the Globalist Trillionaire parasite caste pay their puppets well in comparison to us plebs, but the perks include a carte blanche protection against being held accountable for crimes for anything from embezzlement, high treason and now the increaingly popular practice of genocide.
It's unethical to mandate anyone, not just "kids" to get a vaXX. or put any other substance into your body. It's an outrage. Period. We have to stand up to these people, if you argue with them you add to the fool pool. "Dr" Demented Gates was going to administer an anti STD (aka antibiotic) into his wife to protect her from a disease he got. They are all insane.
Has anyone seen the French study published in JAMA that appears to say that the mRNA vaccines provided a mortality benefit over 4 years post vaccination for the age group 18-59? I have not studied statistics so I would appreciate an informed opinion from someone who understands the numbers and nuances.
I have been made aware of many studies that would seem to fly in the face of such a result, but this study claims to have evaluated the health data of 22.7 million vaccinated and 5.9 million unvaccinated in France over a 4 year period.
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination and 4-Year All-Cause Mortality Among Adults Aged 18 to 59 Years in France
Laura Semenzato, PhD, MSc1; Stéphane Le Vu, PhD1; Jérémie Botton, PhD, PharmD, MPH1,2 et al
It is ALWAYS unethical to mandate any medical intervention, REGARDLESS of the expected results. It violates informed consent, and consent means there is no coercion and you can say no without negative consequences, even if others think you're being unreasonable.
It is also unethical to *recommend* a medical intervention when you already know it will do harm.
The standards for safety are far too lax, allowing interventions already known to kill some people and harm others.
"DO NO HARM" and other absolutes have been removed from what was the Hippocratic Oath. A meaningless placeholder is used ceremonially instead.
It is unethical to conduct a medical trial that you already know will kill or harm trial participants.
Even more unethical: risking deaths to prevent a disease that didn't kill anyone. There were no excess deaths in 2020, the year of "Covid" without "vaccines". Respiratory conditions were renamed as "Covid", tests so wildly unreliable as to be meaningless helped this lie. Subsequent years showed far more deaths and other harms among those who took the shots - any of them.
Steve you KNOW this; you wrote about it. I'm referencing YOUR OWN WORK.
Therefore, the only truly ethical thing to do would be to ban the mandates, recommendations, administration, manufacture, or storage in any form of these extremely harmful substances, with stringent enforcement.
Yes. There seems to be a false equivocation going on here between two separate concepts: “recommendations” and “mandates.” A “recommendation” can be unethical if it’s known by the one recommending to be based on fraudulent or incomplete research or safety trials; or if the recommendation itself misrepresents the conclusions of otherwise honest research and safety studies. Since the initial research and follow up safety studies are always necessarily performed on either laboratory animals and/or a statistical representation of the human population, it stands to reason that any recommendation for a given *individual* always necessarily amounts to at least some measure of misrepresentation. No individual is exactly like a statistical whole. For this unescapable reason, the government should not be in the recommendation business. Private medical practitioners, however, should be free to make recommendations PROVIDED THAT THEY ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AND ARE ABLE TO, IN TURN, HOLD DRUG MANUFACTURERS LIABLE IN THE CASE OF FRAUD.
…
Now mandates are a completely separate matter—and concept. A medical mandate is a form of involuntary servitude—slavery! Not only are they unethical; they’re also unconstitutional (and should be challenged as such by the Justice Department, Civil Rights Division.) The false equivocation is most evident when one imagines the absurd scenario whereby a slave owner is granted legal permission to own slaves provided that the slave labor is 1) judged to be for the “public good,” and 2) the slave labor performed is judged to be 99.99 % safe and effective for the alleged benefit of someone else; and 3) if injured while performing slave labor, the slave is able to register their injury on a federal data base and apply to a non-Article III court for compensation—maybe. If the preceding analogy doesn’t quite make the point, I’d simply ask the following rhetorical question: When determining an ethical standard for mandatory medical interventions, would the standard for man be different than the standard for cattle?
It is worse ... it is evil genocide! https://larrykaifesh.substack.com/p/the-covid-vaccine-a-test-run-genocide
It is unethical to mandate anyone to get any vaccine shot at any time!
Exactly. Its shocking that they are still suggesting our most vulnerable get this. Elders and people with comorbidities are MOST susceptible to vaccine injury, yet they are still suggesting they get it! Knowing it doesnt stop people from getting sick anyway. Unreal.
If your vaccine works, you don't need to worry about whether or not anyone else has taken it. If your vaccine does not work, you don't need to worry about whether or not someone else has taken it and you should be focused on why you took it. Mandates are unneeded and immoral.
Agreed. What is sad is I was interviewing a doctor for my kids and she said she required all children to get the Covid injection, even thought both are documented as having had it and had no real issue. I told her that I trust science and if she had a large cohort RCT I would like to read it. She then stood up and said she did not think she would like to have my kids as patients.
That doctor is a killer. Theres NO WAY shes not seeing the harm.
Saving this forever. I have 5 kids and they will each learn this truth. Thank you for drawing it out and sharing it so succinctly!
Thanks for your kind words. To teach your children critical thinking skills is one of the most important things you can do for them.
They didn’t goof. Just ask the AAP …
Son todos unos SÁTRAPAS y GENOCIDAS SERIALES. Nos llamaban CONSPIRANOICOS a quienes objetábamos, dudábamos o cuestionábamos todo el TERRORISMO SANITARIO implementado a partir de 2020 y, en realidad, ELLOS (MÉDICOS, POLÍTICOS y EXPERTOS EN NADA) fueron los verdaderos CONSPIRADORES. No tienen PERDÓN y deberían ser SANCIONADOS por TRIBUNALES ÉTICOS INTERNACIONALES.
Translation: "They are all SATRAPS and SERIAL GENOCIDALS. They called us CONSPIRATORS, those of us who objected, doubted or questioned all the HEALTH TERRORISM implemented from 2020 onwards and, in reality, THEY (MEDICIANS, POLITICIANS and EXPERTS IN NOTHING) were the real CONSPIRATORS. They have no FORGIVENESS and should be SANCTIONED by INTERNATIONAL ETHICAL COURTS."
Bet you don't know that a banking crisis began on September 17, 2019. The Federal Reserve secretly funneled nearly $20 trillion into Wall Street megabanks to save them from crashing. The next banking crisis began in March 2020 and was blamed on the fake COVID "pandemic." The Fed used the same emergency lending programs that it had used for the 2008 crisis, known as the "global financial crisis" (GFC). The COVID-era banking crisis is mostly absent from the mainstream media, which blames COVID for all the problems of that era. The COVID "pandemic" served as a cover to prevent the public from knowing that there was the potential for another catastrophic financial crisis. Partially from the Wall Street On Parade article "The Fund Created to Unwind a Failing Megabank Has a Problem: There's No Money in it."
You're too merciful. It was demonstrable evil - not incompetence - that guided their decisions.
I agree with you there. I always try to write as fact-based and truthful as possible and avoid assumptions. As a result, I am certainly sometimes too weak in my criticism. But to be clear, I believe there is now no doubt that Covid crimes are not incompetence, but malice.
Many thanks for your today's post !!! 👍👍👍
The global depop-agenda is going-on unabated.
Vaxx for children are as effective as killing minors in Gaza: just prevent the next generation from ever happening ...
The mass-killers are preparing the next plandemic because most sheeple are too gullible, conformist and unable to see what is developing in front of their very eyes.
The %age of people who could be able to incite a REAL backlash is far to low to even scare these demons ...
The Covid creeps have created a cult that most of the population believed in and maybe still does. It is very difficult to get rid of a pervasive cult. You have to admit the group of psychopaths who orchestrated this experience are actually pretty brilliant.
Four years ago VRBPAC met to decide whether to expand the Covid jabs from 11yr olds to 5 yr olds. I sent a comment letter to them making similar points to those in this post: The risks far outweigh any questionable benefit. At a minimum these kids should be tested to see if they already have naturally acquired immunity which would obviate the need for an experimental injection that would put them at risk for serious harm or even death. Despite the clear evidence to the contrary, the committee rubber stamped the expansion to 5 yr olds. When one of the distinguished experts on the committee was asked why they voted to do this, his answer was mind blowing. This from Gemini AI:
Dr. Rubin, an editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine and a member of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), made this comment during a discussion regarding the authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5 to 11.
The Quote: "We're never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That's just the way it goes. That's how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like the rotavirus vaccine," he said before voting to authorize the vaccine for that age group.
It is unethical to mandate anyone put any of these witches brews into their body, especially with no proof any of them have ever saved a single life.
"Summary: Nobody has admitted they goofed." Because nobody did. It's not difficult to understand that those that developed these products knew exactly what they were doing. Because they also knew they could control the narrative via institutional takeover (regulators, professional organizations, the media etc.) they just steamrolled ahead. Everyone else just fell in line and if you dared not to you were simply pushed aside or crushed. No comedy of errors involved.
Exactly. They could have easily made up some concoction that would fool everyone into believing it was saving their life.... without harming anyone. And everyone would have just continued to take it for the rest of their lives thinking theyd be dead without it. They didnt. People ARE being harmed and they are covering it up and lying about it. Therefore it HAS to be intentional.
Indeed the Globalist Trillionaire parasite caste pay their puppets well in comparison to us plebs, but the perks include a carte blanche protection against being held accountable for crimes for anything from embezzlement, high treason and now the increaingly popular practice of genocide.
It's unethical to mandate anyone, not just "kids" to get a vaXX. or put any other substance into your body. It's an outrage. Period. We have to stand up to these people, if you argue with them you add to the fool pool. "Dr" Demented Gates was going to administer an anti STD (aka antibiotic) into his wife to protect her from a disease he got. They are all insane.
Has anyone seen the French study published in JAMA that appears to say that the mRNA vaccines provided a mortality benefit over 4 years post vaccination for the age group 18-59? I have not studied statistics so I would appreciate an informed opinion from someone who understands the numbers and nuances.
I have been made aware of many studies that would seem to fly in the face of such a result, but this study claims to have evaluated the health data of 22.7 million vaccinated and 5.9 million unvaccinated in France over a 4 year period.
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination and 4-Year All-Cause Mortality Among Adults Aged 18 to 59 Years in France
Laura Semenzato, PhD, MSc1; Stéphane Le Vu, PhD1; Jérémie Botton, PhD, PharmD, MPH1,2 et al
Yes, Steve Kirsch addressed it here; https://kirschsubstack.com/p/new-jama-paper-claim-vaccines-reduced?utm_source=publication-search
It is ALWAYS unethical to mandate any medical intervention, REGARDLESS of the expected results. It violates informed consent, and consent means there is no coercion and you can say no without negative consequences, even if others think you're being unreasonable.
It is also unethical to *recommend* a medical intervention when you already know it will do harm.
The standards for safety are far too lax, allowing interventions already known to kill some people and harm others.
"DO NO HARM" and other absolutes have been removed from what was the Hippocratic Oath. A meaningless placeholder is used ceremonially instead.
It is unethical to conduct a medical trial that you already know will kill or harm trial participants.
Even more unethical: risking deaths to prevent a disease that didn't kill anyone. There were no excess deaths in 2020, the year of "Covid" without "vaccines". Respiratory conditions were renamed as "Covid", tests so wildly unreliable as to be meaningless helped this lie. Subsequent years showed far more deaths and other harms among those who took the shots - any of them.
Steve you KNOW this; you wrote about it. I'm referencing YOUR OWN WORK.
Therefore, the only truly ethical thing to do would be to ban the mandates, recommendations, administration, manufacture, or storage in any form of these extremely harmful substances, with stringent enforcement.
Yes. There seems to be a false equivocation going on here between two separate concepts: “recommendations” and “mandates.” A “recommendation” can be unethical if it’s known by the one recommending to be based on fraudulent or incomplete research or safety trials; or if the recommendation itself misrepresents the conclusions of otherwise honest research and safety studies. Since the initial research and follow up safety studies are always necessarily performed on either laboratory animals and/or a statistical representation of the human population, it stands to reason that any recommendation for a given *individual* always necessarily amounts to at least some measure of misrepresentation. No individual is exactly like a statistical whole. For this unescapable reason, the government should not be in the recommendation business. Private medical practitioners, however, should be free to make recommendations PROVIDED THAT THEY ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AND ARE ABLE TO, IN TURN, HOLD DRUG MANUFACTURERS LIABLE IN THE CASE OF FRAUD.
…
Now mandates are a completely separate matter—and concept. A medical mandate is a form of involuntary servitude—slavery! Not only are they unethical; they’re also unconstitutional (and should be challenged as such by the Justice Department, Civil Rights Division.) The false equivocation is most evident when one imagines the absurd scenario whereby a slave owner is granted legal permission to own slaves provided that the slave labor is 1) judged to be for the “public good,” and 2) the slave labor performed is judged to be 99.99 % safe and effective for the alleged benefit of someone else; and 3) if injured while performing slave labor, the slave is able to register their injury on a federal data base and apply to a non-Article III court for compensation—maybe. If the preceding analogy doesn’t quite make the point, I’d simply ask the following rhetorical question: When determining an ethical standard for mandatory medical interventions, would the standard for man be different than the standard for cattle?