I keep on thinking about the evidence almost proving the formerly called and so-called “conspiracy” theory of lab created virus. In a court of law it would be “beyond reasonable doubt”. One evidence is Daszaks own signed letter (along with other scientists) in the Lancet protesting that the lab leak theory was a “conspiracy” and not viab…
I keep on thinking about the evidence almost proving the formerly called and so-called “conspiracy” theory of lab created virus. In a court of law it would be “beyond reasonable doubt”. One evidence is Daszaks own signed letter (along with other scientists) in the Lancet protesting that the lab leak theory was a “conspiracy” and not viable. Oh come on. That letter, in and of itself, proves he was in on it. Because too many proofs of the opposite (including proving HE was one of the lynchpins in the operation).
I keep on thinking about the evidence almost proving the formerly called and so-called “conspiracy” theory of lab created virus. In a court of law it would be “beyond reasonable doubt”. One evidence is Daszaks own signed letter (along with other scientists) in the Lancet protesting that the lab leak theory was a “conspiracy” and not viable. Oh come on. That letter, in and of itself, proves he was in on it. Because too many proofs of the opposite (including proving HE was one of the lynchpins in the operation).