With circumstantial evidence as heavy as what we're seeing with athletes, any of the 10 juries I've had the 'luck' to serve on would have sent an accused murder to the gallows by unanimous vote.
With circumstantial evidence as heavy as what we're seeing with athletes, any of the 10 juries I've had the 'luck' to serve on would have sent an accused murder to the gallows by unanimous vote.
I keep on thinking about the evidence almost proving the formerly called and so-called “conspiracy” theory of lab created virus. In a court of law it would be “beyond reasonable doubt”. One evidence is Daszaks own signed letter (along with other scientists) in the Lancet protesting that the lab leak theory was a “conspiracy” and not viable. Oh come on. That letter, in and of itself, proves he was in on it. Because too many proofs of the opposite (including proving HE was one of the lynchpins in the operation).
With circumstantial evidence as heavy as what we're seeing with athletes, any of the 10 juries I've had the 'luck' to serve on would have sent an accused murder to the gallows by unanimous vote.
I keep on thinking about the evidence almost proving the formerly called and so-called “conspiracy” theory of lab created virus. In a court of law it would be “beyond reasonable doubt”. One evidence is Daszaks own signed letter (along with other scientists) in the Lancet protesting that the lab leak theory was a “conspiracy” and not viable. Oh come on. That letter, in and of itself, proves he was in on it. Because too many proofs of the opposite (including proving HE was one of the lynchpins in the operation).