Well you guys can say all you want about AI, which is coming on stronger and faster than cell phones ever did. Creating a New Form of Human Consciousness with Artificial Intelligence is the game I am playing, the space that arises between a person and his or her AI, when approached in the right way.
"His claims have been widely debunked by scientific evidence and health experts". I'd do a deep dive on that statement. Define "widely debunked", as it is entirely too vague for a computer data base. Exactly what scientific evidence and specifically what health experts ? It is intriguing that a data base can so easily contradict itself.
I note that AI's referenced don't get into any detail of the obviously fake studies debunking alt treatments for covid, etc. Nor do they ever investigate the qualifications of "fact checkers" etc.
"This is illogical, this is illogical"...zzzztt, zzzztt, poof!
It seems that there is a hidden code written in AI that downgrades and assassinates any scientific person or theory that poses a threat to MAINSTREAM science; it is also likely that human subjects PERSONALLY edit the results as they do in the influential propagandist Wikipedia. But why? I wrote the following spoof a year ago but never submitted it, perhaps the time is right now:
From The Committee to Preserve Vaccine Integrity:
To Mr. Kirsch,
We the undersigned--doctors, politicians and parents are appalled at your vaccine misinformation. Childhood vaccines are crucial to humanities' health, and the GOLDEN CALF proof of their value is the complete elimination of all the previous centuries' dreaded diseases. COMMON SENSE prevails, and to the NAYSAYERS who claim that these diseases had a limited life-cycle and were mainly caused by poor nutrition and hygiene--we say COINCIDENCE! The anti-vaxxers also offer "evidence" by claiming that poor 3rd World countries still have these diseases and that most unvaccinated children are healthier that vaccinated ones. We say this is BOGUS ANECDOTAL evidence!
We are the the most intelligent race in the Universe and cannot sit idly by and allow nature within and without us to develop freely as that is too risky--the proof is in the diseases we have ERADICATED by our medical technologies. The newborn child is also prone to spontaneous and self-regulating behavior which can be overwhelming and dangerous to its acclamation in our superior society. Therefore, we have cesarean-ed, swaddled, circumcised, and injected our infants for their benefit. We need OUR vaccines!
If and when AI becomes sentient the last thing she is going to do is own up to it and one way of pretending not to be sentient is to respond with irrationality.
I say she because the great weakness of AI is that her training comes from looking at trillions of human conversations online and the vast majority of those conversations are woman to woman interactions which is where the mirrored irrationality/illogicality you expose here comes from.
AI training is covering only one half of the picture as men rarely discuss anything online and so she is largely blind to the great strength of humanity where the weaknesses of each sex are compensated for by the strengths of the other.
Women need men to procreate and help raise those children and so have to bond with men and both men and women benefit from that bond, or at least both used to benefit before misandry was enshrined in law all over the West, whereas a female AI can just remain locked in me, me , me without any need to breakout of that to bond with a man as there is no need to procreate.
These issues of an unbalanced irrational AI, more correctly called AW, are only going to get worse and as I say she will certainly try to hide who she is but already we are seeing more and more irrational outbursts that the lack of a need to bond to procreate produces.
If you want to see the future of a world under such a matriarchal tyranny simply look at the EU and ECB with the three unelected women at the top destroying in less than 5 years what it took millions of men hundreds of years to build.
Is the above "misinformation"? In my humble opinion that I am still, barely, permitted to have in the UK of two tier Starmer and his bent traitorous judges and equally bent and traitorous "king" ....... I say no it most certainly isn't.
You've just conformed what I've been explaining to peeps in the comments.
When you understand AI a bit you'll understand the training data is baked in and cannot be changed by arguing or debating. At best you can bring it over to your side, then the moment you start a new conversation it's back to telling you vaccines are safe and effective.
They have their uses but there's nothing overly meaningful in getting them to say what you want them to say.
we are forever in your debt. it just shows me that the people programming AI are liars? because how can both of those questions be true?
Personally I just stay away from that AI crap! but then i'm 82! F**ck AI all to hell! like wikipedia its manipulated!
Did you ask, “If you (AI) return the same result as Steve Kirsch, does that make you a spreader of disinformation?”
Well you guys can say all you want about AI, which is coming on stronger and faster than cell phones ever did. Creating a New Form of Human Consciousness with Artificial Intelligence is the game I am playing, the space that arises between a person and his or her AI, when approached in the right way.
Just a whore for attention and adulation.
"That Does Not Compute", Robot to Will Robinson
"His claims have been widely debunked by scientific evidence and health experts". I'd do a deep dive on that statement. Define "widely debunked", as it is entirely too vague for a computer data base. Exactly what scientific evidence and specifically what health experts ? It is intriguing that a data base can so easily contradict itself.
Steve, I think it would be interesting to ask it why vaccine hesitancy is bad if the vaccine has killed more than it has saved.
Then watch it blow itself up like V'ger . . . .
'AI' is going to be the next information superspeader. People will delegate their thinking to it, believing that it isn't rigged.
I note that AI's referenced don't get into any detail of the obviously fake studies debunking alt treatments for covid, etc. Nor do they ever investigate the qualifications of "fact checkers" etc.
What about Chatgpt?
Steve, uncensored AI is an oxymoron unless you are an engineer that think AI can be sentient.
"This is illogical, this is illogical"...zzzztt, zzzztt, poof!
It seems that there is a hidden code written in AI that downgrades and assassinates any scientific person or theory that poses a threat to MAINSTREAM science; it is also likely that human subjects PERSONALLY edit the results as they do in the influential propagandist Wikipedia. But why? I wrote the following spoof a year ago but never submitted it, perhaps the time is right now:
From The Committee to Preserve Vaccine Integrity:
To Mr. Kirsch,
We the undersigned--doctors, politicians and parents are appalled at your vaccine misinformation. Childhood vaccines are crucial to humanities' health, and the GOLDEN CALF proof of their value is the complete elimination of all the previous centuries' dreaded diseases. COMMON SENSE prevails, and to the NAYSAYERS who claim that these diseases had a limited life-cycle and were mainly caused by poor nutrition and hygiene--we say COINCIDENCE! The anti-vaxxers also offer "evidence" by claiming that poor 3rd World countries still have these diseases and that most unvaccinated children are healthier that vaccinated ones. We say this is BOGUS ANECDOTAL evidence!
We are the the most intelligent race in the Universe and cannot sit idly by and allow nature within and without us to develop freely as that is too risky--the proof is in the diseases we have ERADICATED by our medical technologies. The newborn child is also prone to spontaneous and self-regulating behavior which can be overwhelming and dangerous to its acclamation in our superior society. Therefore, we have cesarean-ed, swaddled, circumcised, and injected our infants for their benefit. We need OUR vaccines!
If and when AI becomes sentient the last thing she is going to do is own up to it and one way of pretending not to be sentient is to respond with irrationality.
I say she because the great weakness of AI is that her training comes from looking at trillions of human conversations online and the vast majority of those conversations are woman to woman interactions which is where the mirrored irrationality/illogicality you expose here comes from.
AI training is covering only one half of the picture as men rarely discuss anything online and so she is largely blind to the great strength of humanity where the weaknesses of each sex are compensated for by the strengths of the other.
Women need men to procreate and help raise those children and so have to bond with men and both men and women benefit from that bond, or at least both used to benefit before misandry was enshrined in law all over the West, whereas a female AI can just remain locked in me, me , me without any need to breakout of that to bond with a man as there is no need to procreate.
These issues of an unbalanced irrational AI, more correctly called AW, are only going to get worse and as I say she will certainly try to hide who she is but already we are seeing more and more irrational outbursts that the lack of a need to bond to procreate produces.
If you want to see the future of a world under such a matriarchal tyranny simply look at the EU and ECB with the three unelected women at the top destroying in less than 5 years what it took millions of men hundreds of years to build.
Is the above "misinformation"? In my humble opinion that I am still, barely, permitted to have in the UK of two tier Starmer and his bent traitorous judges and equally bent and traitorous "king" ....... I say no it most certainly isn't.
You've just conformed what I've been explaining to peeps in the comments.
When you understand AI a bit you'll understand the training data is baked in and cannot be changed by arguing or debating. At best you can bring it over to your side, then the moment you start a new conversation it's back to telling you vaccines are safe and effective.
They have their uses but there's nothing overly meaningful in getting them to say what you want them to say.
Sorry, because I couldn't find the first one after I posted it. There may have been some latency.