928 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

You can't demonstrate the alleged truth of "SURPLUS VALUE" theory or the labor theory of value by spelling profit as "SURPLUS VALUE" or e, x, p, l, o, i, t, a, t, i, o, n. Go read one of your many apostates, David Ramsay Steele, to educate yourself about some insoluable problems of Marxism and other species of communist idiocy. You can find a sideways introduction to the topic in

The Mystery of Fascism:

Mussolini - as he woud like to have been remembered

http://www.la-articles.org.uk/fascism.htm

Pay attention when the author discusses the Crisis of Marxism of the 1890's. It's related to the rise of superfascism in China, which is rife with corruption, esp. among party hacks and the Princelings, the descendants of the Eight Elders.

Incorporation, too, of course, is implicated in the troubles of leftwing China, and it's no secret that the institution was preserved and extended throughout the world with the connivance and help of Marxists, Leninists, etc. Funny this. There's a neo-Fascist movement throughout the "West" to establish communist dictatorships by taking over from within the corporations of the Earth.

It's by the way also that accounting has a well developed vocabulary which is adequte to describe with nuance the differences between revenues and expenses. Feel free to notice the omission of moralizing gibberish, just like a good mathematics or physics textbook would omit that gunk.

Expand full comment