147 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Demand for ‘Unvaxxed Sperm’ from ‘Purebloods’ Skyrockets

https://newsaddicts.com/demand-unvaxxed-sperm-purebloods-skyrockets/

I am the UnVaxxed man in this video! Send help!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRKqwvw6cTGb/

For my age group, old, retired and cynical I was assured Natural Immunity would protect me from Covid. .........It did.

I am 100% immune from the Fake Vaxx side effects because I did not take it!

Leave a message ladies!

Expand full comment

How does one prove the claims of men who haven’t been vaccinated? The reason I ask is because there is PLENTY of evidence showing that as soon as spike protein reaches the spleen, the vaxxed then begins to exhale spike protein like a gas. It’s known as “shedding” and only 30% of a population needs to be vaccinated in order to infect the whole population. The powers that be know this already so again, the question remains: How are those who make these claims of unvaccinated sperm being vetted?

Expand full comment

Nope!

https://www.healthline.com/health/vaccine-shedding

Do any of the COVID-19 vaccines shed?

The only COVID-19 vaccines that are currently authorized for emergency use are mRNA vaccines and viral vector vaccines. While you may have seen posts on social media about COVID-19 vaccines shedding, this is a myth. COVID-19 vaccines cannot be shed.

This is because none of the COVID-19 vaccines contain live SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The only COVID-19 vaccines that are currently authorized for emergency use are mRNA vaccines and viral vector vaccines.

Expand full comment

LOL!!! You're funny! There are plenty of people with medical degrees that will tell you all sorts of things that are debatable. So who can you trust? Perhaps you would take their word over the companies that are doing the actual research, conducting the trials, and marketing these mRNA vaccines. Is that the case??? If you can't trust the people who are developing and producing these mRNA vaccines, then who can you trust? Here's what Pfizer has to say on the subject:

“A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.”

https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

When they say: "PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE", they're referring to the Gold Standard of medical science.

Did you happen to notice the link???

On page 67, we find a warning about potential adverse effects of the vaccine. The term “study intervention” is used instead of the more common "vaccination". “Environmental exposure” means contact with elements of the vaccine other than by injection.

Warning of adverse effect: “A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:”

“A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.”

“A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”

These warnings, from the vaccine manufacturer, Pfizer imply that women can be harmed by breathing in, or contacting by skin, the vaccine as it moves from person to person. Which is the definition of “shedding.”

Expand full comment