1. Diseases are not caused by viruses or germs. Correct.
2. Flus, colds, ‘germs’, and other disease cannot be transmitted from person to person. Correct.
3. Spoiled food can result in bacteria making us sick, but is not transmissible from person to person. Not exactly... Bacteria do not make us sick. Bacteria are only present to consu…
1. Diseases are not caused by viruses or germs. Correct.
2. Flus, colds, ‘germs’, and other disease cannot be transmitted from person to person. Correct.
3. Spoiled food can result in bacteria making us sick, but is not transmissible from person to person. Not exactly... Bacteria do not make us sick. Bacteria are only present to consume dead and dying tissue.
4. Bacteria is not the same thing as a germ. It is real and can be viewed in a microscope without changing the substance of the sample. - Germ is a pretty generic term. Whether you think of germs as a virus (they dont exist) or bacteria (these are the good guys), there simply arent microscopic germs that make us sick. With a sickness, we usually think of symptoms. Runny nose, coughing, fever, swelling, etc. Most doctors are taught and therefore tell their patients that these symptoms ARE the illness. This is completely wrong. Symptoms are our body's beautiful way of detoxing itself. Symptoms are the cure! Yet we are told they are the disease. So what to MDs do? Give us pharmaceuticals to get rid of the symptoms!! And we wonder why despite all our advanced medical technologies we are one of the sickest countries on earth! Unfortunately, we live in a world surrounded by toxins: chemicals, cleaning supplies, herbicides, pesticides, we live in homes built with chemically treated lumber, plastics, overwhelming non native EMF's, vaccines... we are constantly ingesting toxins, breathing them in, bathing in them... so we get symptoms to detox. That's it. No bogeyman invisible germ that no one ever has seen. :)
5. Bacteria is not transmissible from person to person. - Bacteria is essentially omni present. There are literally trillions living in your body right now. They're everywhere. Kiss your wife and you'll exchange bacteria. But it won't make you sick.
6. No ‘virus’ is visible in a microscope (not even an electron miscroscope) without doing something to the sample to make it visible. - You're close. Even after they starve and poison monkey kidney cells mixed with fetal bovine serum and antibiotics, etc. they do not see a virus. They see particles created by the cell death that they caused, and call those particles a virus. Mysteriously, they CANNOT see these same particles in the sputum taken from a sick person.
7. No one in history has ever proven a ‘virus’ can be transmitted from person to person. Correct. Not even close. We only have bogus theories to explain epidemiological observations -- a bunch of people getting sick. We have nothing resembling proof.
8. The appearance of a virus in a prepared sample is the body’s expulsion of particles from toxins, contaminations, or other environmental injury. - No. See #6 if this is what you mean by prepared sample. If you mean sputum directly from a patient, they cannot see virus. They can get a positive PCR test. This is a long rabbit hole (PCR) but the simplest thing to consider is - given the fact they have NEVER seen or isolated a SARS-CoV-2 virus, what are they testing for? Well, they're testing for a match of a genetic sequence constructed in-silico (on a computer) based on one of these BS in-vitro cultures they do in a lab (see #6). To get this genetic sequence they upload a batch of data representing the various genetic material that appeared in this soup of monkey cells, bovine calf serum, etc. and even then, they can't build out the entire viral genome. So the computer fills in the gaps with likely missing links. So, they are LITERALLY testing for a sequence that has never appeared in nature. They readily admit this. I'll shut up on this one, but there's a lot more to say on PCR.
9. The PCR test doesn’t prove the existence of a virus, but may reveal the existence of a common set of symptoms caused by similar environmental factors or contamination. - Almost and maybe. Honestly, it doesn't matter what they are testing for or what the test shows once you realize where they get the original sequence from. It's literally a guess based on throwing a shit ton of data on genetic particles they found from their toxic lab soup into a computer, making up the missing pieces because they dont have a complete genome. PCR cant tell us anything about symptoms, but maybe it tells us commonalities humans have when experiencing detox/illness. Maybe our cells break down in the same way. Whatever it is, it doesnt matter because it definitely DOES NOT tell us we have a virus. So whatever it tells us, it ain't that! : )
10. It is still possible the appearance of COVID was caused by a biological or some other environmental weapon. - I do not think this is possible. We could all be poisoned by something, sure. Poison the water, the air, our electro-magnetic environment (The Invisible Rainbow is a MUST READ)...
But it's not a virus. Johns Hopkins gave a presentation in 2020 showing no excess deaths in the US. We are told the "virus" called the flu just disappeared and we just nod our heads like mindless zombies and just accept that that's true. There was no virus. Remdesivir, Ventilators, isolation, heartache, depression, and vaccines killed people. We all know noone dies from Covid at home right? Only in the hospital. This was all propaganda. Mass formation.
Hope this helps. Email me if you want to continue the convo - jthompclt@gmail.com
You should watch this documentary on AIDS. Same as covid, they just reclassified an already existing set of symptoms. Really good film-- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwgmzbnckII
You should watch House of Numbers on AIDS. Will blow your mind. They get into the lab tests, electron microscopy, everything I mention above on Covid. WIth AIDS, just like covid, they reclassified an already existing set of symptoms and called it AIDS. RFK Jr. actually has great insight on this. Here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwgmzbnckII
1. Diseases are not caused by viruses or germs. Correct.
2. Flus, colds, ‘germs’, and other disease cannot be transmitted from person to person. Correct.
3. Spoiled food can result in bacteria making us sick, but is not transmissible from person to person. Not exactly... Bacteria do not make us sick. Bacteria are only present to consume dead and dying tissue.
4. Bacteria is not the same thing as a germ. It is real and can be viewed in a microscope without changing the substance of the sample. - Germ is a pretty generic term. Whether you think of germs as a virus (they dont exist) or bacteria (these are the good guys), there simply arent microscopic germs that make us sick. With a sickness, we usually think of symptoms. Runny nose, coughing, fever, swelling, etc. Most doctors are taught and therefore tell their patients that these symptoms ARE the illness. This is completely wrong. Symptoms are our body's beautiful way of detoxing itself. Symptoms are the cure! Yet we are told they are the disease. So what to MDs do? Give us pharmaceuticals to get rid of the symptoms!! And we wonder why despite all our advanced medical technologies we are one of the sickest countries on earth! Unfortunately, we live in a world surrounded by toxins: chemicals, cleaning supplies, herbicides, pesticides, we live in homes built with chemically treated lumber, plastics, overwhelming non native EMF's, vaccines... we are constantly ingesting toxins, breathing them in, bathing in them... so we get symptoms to detox. That's it. No bogeyman invisible germ that no one ever has seen. :)
5. Bacteria is not transmissible from person to person. - Bacteria is essentially omni present. There are literally trillions living in your body right now. They're everywhere. Kiss your wife and you'll exchange bacteria. But it won't make you sick.
6. No ‘virus’ is visible in a microscope (not even an electron miscroscope) without doing something to the sample to make it visible. - You're close. Even after they starve and poison monkey kidney cells mixed with fetal bovine serum and antibiotics, etc. they do not see a virus. They see particles created by the cell death that they caused, and call those particles a virus. Mysteriously, they CANNOT see these same particles in the sputum taken from a sick person.
7. No one in history has ever proven a ‘virus’ can be transmitted from person to person. Correct. Not even close. We only have bogus theories to explain epidemiological observations -- a bunch of people getting sick. We have nothing resembling proof.
8. The appearance of a virus in a prepared sample is the body’s expulsion of particles from toxins, contaminations, or other environmental injury. - No. See #6 if this is what you mean by prepared sample. If you mean sputum directly from a patient, they cannot see virus. They can get a positive PCR test. This is a long rabbit hole (PCR) but the simplest thing to consider is - given the fact they have NEVER seen or isolated a SARS-CoV-2 virus, what are they testing for? Well, they're testing for a match of a genetic sequence constructed in-silico (on a computer) based on one of these BS in-vitro cultures they do in a lab (see #6). To get this genetic sequence they upload a batch of data representing the various genetic material that appeared in this soup of monkey cells, bovine calf serum, etc. and even then, they can't build out the entire viral genome. So the computer fills in the gaps with likely missing links. So, they are LITERALLY testing for a sequence that has never appeared in nature. They readily admit this. I'll shut up on this one, but there's a lot more to say on PCR.
9. The PCR test doesn’t prove the existence of a virus, but may reveal the existence of a common set of symptoms caused by similar environmental factors or contamination. - Almost and maybe. Honestly, it doesn't matter what they are testing for or what the test shows once you realize where they get the original sequence from. It's literally a guess based on throwing a shit ton of data on genetic particles they found from their toxic lab soup into a computer, making up the missing pieces because they dont have a complete genome. PCR cant tell us anything about symptoms, but maybe it tells us commonalities humans have when experiencing detox/illness. Maybe our cells break down in the same way. Whatever it is, it doesnt matter because it definitely DOES NOT tell us we have a virus. So whatever it tells us, it ain't that! : )
10. It is still possible the appearance of COVID was caused by a biological or some other environmental weapon. - I do not think this is possible. We could all be poisoned by something, sure. Poison the water, the air, our electro-magnetic environment (The Invisible Rainbow is a MUST READ)...
But it's not a virus. Johns Hopkins gave a presentation in 2020 showing no excess deaths in the US. We are told the "virus" called the flu just disappeared and we just nod our heads like mindless zombies and just accept that that's true. There was no virus. Remdesivir, Ventilators, isolation, heartache, depression, and vaccines killed people. We all know noone dies from Covid at home right? Only in the hospital. This was all propaganda. Mass formation.
Hope this helps. Email me if you want to continue the convo - jthompclt@gmail.com
You should watch this documentary on AIDS. Same as covid, they just reclassified an already existing set of symptoms. Really good film-- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwgmzbnckII
You should watch House of Numbers on AIDS. Will blow your mind. They get into the lab tests, electron microscopy, everything I mention above on Covid. WIth AIDS, just like covid, they reclassified an already existing set of symptoms and called it AIDS. RFK Jr. actually has great insight on this. Here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwgmzbnckII