I don't mean disrespect, you sound very confident about the existence of viruses and specifically of COVID-19, so I was wondering:
what do you think about the "control" experiments of Prof Stefan Lanka, that show the following: following the customary and ONLY supposedly authorized method in virology of testing for any virus exi…
I don't mean disrespect, you sound very confident about the existence of viruses and specifically of COVID-19, so I was wondering:
what do you think about the "control" experiments of Prof Stefan Lanka, that show the following: following the customary and ONLY supposedly authorized method in virology of testing for any virus existence, ie.
A) by mixing other (bad for cell survival) things + the purported infected by virus sample
is indistringuishable from a control experiment of
B) by mixing other (bad for cell survival) things + known NOT-to-be infected (ie. healthy) sample.
Thus if A) and B) produce the same bad results for the cells (supposedly attributed to the virus), it certainly opens the door for the common part in A) and B), namely the mixing of other (bad for cell survival) things to actually be the cause of the purported effect normally attributed to the by-virus-infected sample.
Maybe you have another reasonable explanation for these control experiments, it'd be interesting to know how can you exclude the possibility of causation by the other-bad-for-cell-survival things...
Mr Kirsch,
I don't mean disrespect, you sound very confident about the existence of viruses and specifically of COVID-19, so I was wondering:
what do you think about the "control" experiments of Prof Stefan Lanka, that show the following: following the customary and ONLY supposedly authorized method in virology of testing for any virus existence, ie.
A) by mixing other (bad for cell survival) things + the purported infected by virus sample
is indistringuishable from a control experiment of
B) by mixing other (bad for cell survival) things + known NOT-to-be infected (ie. healthy) sample.
Thus if A) and B) produce the same bad results for the cells (supposedly attributed to the virus), it certainly opens the door for the common part in A) and B), namely the mixing of other (bad for cell survival) things to actually be the cause of the purported effect normally attributed to the by-virus-infected sample.
Maybe you have another reasonable explanation for these control experiments, it'd be interesting to know how can you exclude the possibility of causation by the other-bad-for-cell-survival things...
https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f