The burden of proof is on you. No debate or $1MM needed. Just show us any virus ever in the snot of a sick person. That’s it. You’ll end the debate and shut us all up. Use your money to find a virologist with this evidence. Super simple.
The burden of proof is on you. No debate or $1MM needed. Just show us any virus ever in the snot of a sick person. That’s it. You’ll end the debate and shut us all up. Use your money to find a virologist with this evidence. Super simple.
Lol. Now that is funny. Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence. Time for your scientists to pony up the evidence. Or do you have scientists? I really don't think so.
Huh? I make no claim. The claim is that there is something called a virus that causes illness. That’s not my claim. Those who make a claim carry the burden of proof. That’s how it works.
All I’ve asked for is proof of their claim that virus is carried in the lung sputum or other fluids among those infected.
Oh, and appeals to authority are my least favorite logical fallacies. I don’t care who claims what. Credentials mean nothing unless you choose to outsource your opinions to some authority. If you need this affirmation to process logical rationale, then yes I have an army of scientists who are colleagues and agree with me. But you can bring any virologist in the world to me, bring them all. Not one of them can find any virus, and I mean any virus ever, in the fluids taken directly from a sick person. So either use logic to deduce whether this poses a problem to the claim, or go ask some “scientists” and let us know their excuse for never finding virus in some snot.
Let me tell you how it works in the real world be because your little cult doesn't seem to live in it. When something in the scientific world is widely accepted as real based on many decades of research if someone challenges those facts it is up the challanger to show their facts.
Your cult not only doesn't have provabe facts you expect others to pay for your research. That is the definition of pathetic. And your little projection games are laughable.
Aw you seem nice. Thanks for your opinion. In my experience consensus is usually based on a marriage, a rally cry, financial motivation, and so on. See masks, vaccination, wars, and on and on and on…
The burden of proof is on you. No debate or $1MM needed. Just show us any virus ever in the snot of a sick person. That’s it. You’ll end the debate and shut us all up. Use your money to find a virologist with this evidence. Super simple.
Lol. Now that is funny. Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence. Time for your scientists to pony up the evidence. Or do you have scientists? I really don't think so.
Huh? I make no claim. The claim is that there is something called a virus that causes illness. That’s not my claim. Those who make a claim carry the burden of proof. That’s how it works.
All I’ve asked for is proof of their claim that virus is carried in the lung sputum or other fluids among those infected.
Oh, and appeals to authority are my least favorite logical fallacies. I don’t care who claims what. Credentials mean nothing unless you choose to outsource your opinions to some authority. If you need this affirmation to process logical rationale, then yes I have an army of scientists who are colleagues and agree with me. But you can bring any virologist in the world to me, bring them all. Not one of them can find any virus, and I mean any virus ever, in the fluids taken directly from a sick person. So either use logic to deduce whether this poses a problem to the claim, or go ask some “scientists” and let us know their excuse for never finding virus in some snot.
Let me tell you how it works in the real world be because your little cult doesn't seem to live in it. When something in the scientific world is widely accepted as real based on many decades of research if someone challenges those facts it is up the challanger to show their facts.
Your cult not only doesn't have provabe facts you expect others to pay for your research. That is the definition of pathetic. And your little projection games are laughable.
Aw you seem nice. Thanks for your opinion. In my experience consensus is usually based on a marriage, a rally cry, financial motivation, and so on. See masks, vaccination, wars, and on and on and on…
*narrative not marriage lol