The last time I offered someone $100K to take off their mask, I was called a "creep" and it got worldwide attention and 32M views. Will I get the same level of attention on this offer? I doubt it.
The only person who's "creepy" is this Peter Marx, who walks around like a bandit, calling sane people crazy. This Marx reminds me of the homeless addicts wandering on the street, shouting at themselves and others.
I believe you will have very little success convincing anyone to take off their mask at this point. Just look at the level of mind control these past 3 years and how lasting the damage has been thus far. They seem to be committed to this and will gladly don their masks for the rest of their lives. We can probably not dismiss the possibility that many will take their masks with them to the grave and insist on being buried with their masks on.
Big Brother Public Health has an agenda to get synthetic mRNA and LNPs into every man, woman, child, and the USDA will start putting this into our meat supply via animal pseudo-vaccination. They will never debate because they know it’s complete bullshit.
The hidden truth about that fundamentally MISUNDERSTOOD insanity called "psychopathy" is "F E A R
.
So those corrupted criminals run away from each and every effort to clear up the FACTS & the TRUTH - like ordinary criminals - which they are, just hiding a little better, misusing their intelligence for running & hiding & CAMOUFLAGE from the consequences of their crime!
Tim, I watched the Suzanne Humphries video. She makes a good case. The first part of the video is unfortunately polemical, but the second half gets down to the base-rock. I looked up some of her citations, and they bear her out. It seems the smallpox vaccine was ineffective and unsafe.
However, use of variolation and the cowpox treatment date back to the early 17th century at least, when there was no Pharma industry. These early historical usages constitute a natural experiment.
Physicians in the 17th and 18th centuries consistently reported that variolation and cowpox exposure reduced the mortality of smallpox about 10-fold. These are credible reports.
See "Smallpox vaccine: the good, the bad, and the ugly"
The biological theory behind conferring immunity by exposure to a weakened or dead virus is good. The early history cited above validates it.
The question then becomes why vaccinations themselves produce such bad results. It occurs to me that the problem could be method of administration: injection.
Injection by-passes the natural modes of exposure, delivering the immune antagonist directly into the blood stream. Perhaps this is a serious mistake.
Maybe vaccines are better introduced using a nasal inhaler, introducing the weakened pathogen to the tissues that are the evolutionarily typical ports of entry. The immune response will then develop in the natural way, perhaps producing a graded response. This might avoid the adverse events that may come of being immunity-jolted by an injected agonist.
Thomas Mack's "poppycock" article is acutely relevant to the studied abuses during Covid-19:
Mack gives a run-down of the response to the first SARS corona virus outbreak in 2003. Also from China, as it turns out.
The 2003 SARS outbreak was met with standard pandemic containment protocols and was controlled within 3 months. The same would have happened in 2019, without the deliberate, willful and criminal malfeasance of the medical and regulatory establishment.
Yet one more piece of evidence that should be in the prosecutorial armamentum for the eventual trial of those who have knowingly committed crimes against humanity
In any case, thank-you for posting the video link.
Peter Marks has been challenged as the FDA officer for new medicine approvals. I wrote to him myself several times but he seems to be a stubborn troublemaker who continues to ignore the red hot signs with a complete lack of empathy and humanity. This man has been and continues to be directly responsible for genocide in the Fauci category and is high on the list for trial and incarceration.
Totally! How can an individual who is still wearing cloth masks -- admittedly the least effective and most unsanitary of all the masking options -- be taken seriously AT ALL?! This is not rational behavior.
Mark Twain, Kurt Vonnegut and other dead geniuses have commented on this. Humans have a hard time accepting they have been lied to. There too many examples to cite. But Sorry to say it everything the TV and internet has told you about covid is a total lie and propaganda.
WELL DONE STEVE BUT A SHURE BET THEY WIILL NOT TAKE OFF THEIR MASK. THAT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE MARRIED TO IT. BELIEVING A LIE. NOT REALISING THAT THEY CAUSE GREAT HARM. ONE BREATHES IN THE CO2 ONE HAS JUST BREATHED OUT. THEN LACK OF OXYGIN. BACTERIA BUILDS UP AND CAN GET INTO ONES EYES. WHEN WE REMOVED OUR MASKS COVID DID NOT GO UP. I USED A MASK ONLY IN SHOPS AND ONE WITH SILVEROXIDE THAT KILLIED COVID 19 GERMS DEAD . JEFF FROM ENGLAND
The only person who's "creepy" is this Peter Marx, who walks around like a bandit, calling sane people crazy. This Marx reminds me of the homeless addicts wandering on the street, shouting at themselves and others.
Let’s begin the genesis of the 99 monkey theorem via a $250k gentleman’s bet on s stack!!
I will ad a sporting chance for you to think you may win the bet.
I wager that you cannot find more definitive proof in the world of the surreptitious biodigital convergence of humans .
We can write up terms with attorneys and put the funds in escrow until the bet is settled.
Once you are armed with this information.
The man in the mask and all deniers will be smoking huge amounts of intellectual copium and will have their ego and illusions shattered
I will take your $100k.
This exchange will give you undeniable proof that will vindicate your position 100% to all believers and deniers
without question.
This will enable you to make anyone that denies your position look like an absolute bombastic simpleton and Jim Jones cult member.
I have the Moab for your data quiver to slay any BS science quotes from bombastic simpletons defending the Jim Juice
How do I contact you for swift wire?
It is not, per Tony Two Masks, not a vaccine. Questions?
I was on a bus and I witnessed a woman sneezing in her mask. Insane.
Biohazard.
I believe you will have very little success convincing anyone to take off their mask at this point. Just look at the level of mind control these past 3 years and how lasting the damage has been thus far. They seem to be committed to this and will gladly don their masks for the rest of their lives. We can probably not dismiss the possibility that many will take their masks with them to the grave and insist on being buried with their masks on.
Big Brother Public Health has an agenda to get synthetic mRNA and LNPs into every man, woman, child, and the USDA will start putting this into our meat supply via animal pseudo-vaccination. They will never debate because they know it’s complete bullshit.
If they know, doesn't that make them murderers? If they don't know doesn't that make them stupid?
they aren't stupid or low I.Q. so that leaves only one conclusion.
The hidden truth about that fundamentally MISUNDERSTOOD insanity called "psychopathy" is "F E A R
.
So those corrupted criminals run away from each and every effort to clear up the FACTS & the TRUTH - like ordinary criminals - which they are, just hiding a little better, misusing their intelligence for running & hiding & CAMOUFLAGE from the consequences of their crime!
Tim, I watched the Suzanne Humphries video. She makes a good case. The first part of the video is unfortunately polemical, but the second half gets down to the base-rock. I looked up some of her citations, and they bear her out. It seems the smallpox vaccine was ineffective and unsafe.
However, use of variolation and the cowpox treatment date back to the early 17th century at least, when there was no Pharma industry. These early historical usages constitute a natural experiment.
Physicians in the 17th and 18th centuries consistently reported that variolation and cowpox exposure reduced the mortality of smallpox about 10-fold. These are credible reports.
See "Smallpox vaccine: the good, the bad, and the ugly"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069029/
and
"The origins of inoculation"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407399/
The biological theory behind conferring immunity by exposure to a weakened or dead virus is good. The early history cited above validates it.
The question then becomes why vaccinations themselves produce such bad results. It occurs to me that the problem could be method of administration: injection.
Injection by-passes the natural modes of exposure, delivering the immune antagonist directly into the blood stream. Perhaps this is a serious mistake.
Maybe vaccines are better introduced using a nasal inhaler, introducing the weakened pathogen to the tissues that are the evolutionarily typical ports of entry. The immune response will then develop in the natural way, perhaps producing a graded response. This might avoid the adverse events that may come of being immunity-jolted by an injected agonist.
Thomas Mack's "poppycock" article is acutely relevant to the studied abuses during Covid-19:
"The ghost of pandemics past"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7134722/
Mack gives a run-down of the response to the first SARS corona virus outbreak in 2003. Also from China, as it turns out.
The 2003 SARS outbreak was met with standard pandemic containment protocols and was controlled within 3 months. The same would have happened in 2019, without the deliberate, willful and criminal malfeasance of the medical and regulatory establishment.
Yet one more piece of evidence that should be in the prosecutorial armamentum for the eventual trial of those who have knowingly committed crimes against humanity
In any case, thank-you for posting the video link.
You are hilarious!
Marks has the eyes of a man captured and caged. You can’t believe anything from this man.
Peter Marks has been challenged as the FDA officer for new medicine approvals. I wrote to him myself several times but he seems to be a stubborn troublemaker who continues to ignore the red hot signs with a complete lack of empathy and humanity. This man has been and continues to be directly responsible for genocide in the Fauci category and is high on the list for trial and incarceration.
If that above Photograph is of Peter Marks wearing a Mask, which has been fully proven, they do NOT work, then how could you trust anything he says !!
he has to play out the narrative, at least in public. Psychopaths don't give up even if they are driven into a corner.
Offer him $100k to swab and culture his mask and see if he keeps wearing if after you show him the Petri dish after a couple of days.
Totally! How can an individual who is still wearing cloth masks -- admittedly the least effective and most unsanitary of all the masking options -- be taken seriously AT ALL?! This is not rational behavior.
Mark Twain, Kurt Vonnegut and other dead geniuses have commented on this. Humans have a hard time accepting they have been lied to. There too many examples to cite. But Sorry to say it everything the TV and internet has told you about covid is a total lie and propaganda.
WELL DONE STEVE BUT A SHURE BET THEY WIILL NOT TAKE OFF THEIR MASK. THAT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE MARRIED TO IT. BELIEVING A LIE. NOT REALISING THAT THEY CAUSE GREAT HARM. ONE BREATHES IN THE CO2 ONE HAS JUST BREATHED OUT. THEN LACK OF OXYGIN. BACTERIA BUILDS UP AND CAN GET INTO ONES EYES. WHEN WE REMOVED OUR MASKS COVID DID NOT GO UP. I USED A MASK ONLY IN SHOPS AND ONE WITH SILVEROXIDE THAT KILLIED COVID 19 GERMS DEAD . JEFF FROM ENGLAND