And how do they explain the Harvard study which actually tracked the patients after injection, only to learn that over 99% of the ACTUAL injuries and deaths are ever reported by VAERS?
And how do they explain the Harvard study which actually tracked the patients after injection, only to learn that over 99% of the ACTUAL injuries and deaths are ever reported by VAERS?
I had a friend who within a few ours after the third jab was bed ridden for five days, sick for a couple weeks after that. Was at Urgent Care several times and they said it wasn’t the shot. I told her to ask them to put it in VAERS…the nurse had no idea what VAERS was.
Note the 1st sentence in the conclusion (on the homepage, before you even dig into the PDF report) includes the words "less than one percent" are ever reported.
This means that the VAERS numbers must be multiplied by AT LEAST 100 in order to come close to anything REAL.
And how do they explain the Harvard study which actually tracked the patients after injection, only to learn that over 99% of the ACTUAL injuries and deaths are ever reported by VAERS?
SEE: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system
I believe this study,
I had a friend who within a few ours after the third jab was bed ridden for five days, sick for a couple weeks after that. Was at Urgent Care several times and they said it wasn’t the shot. I told her to ask them to put it in VAERS…the nurse had no idea what VAERS was.
Here is the Harvard study that proved less than 1% of all injuries and deaths shortly after vaccination are ever reported through VAERS. https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system
Note the 1st sentence in the conclusion (on the homepage, before you even dig into the PDF report) includes the words "less than one percent" are ever reported.
This means that the VAERS numbers must be multiplied by AT LEAST 100 in order to come close to anything REAL.