Viruses only cause symptoms inside the body because that is where the cells whose machinery they need to hijack are found. And you can see viruses in electron micrographs. Bacteriophages are viruses that only kill bacteria and they are easily isolated, grown and stored in labs. Please stock up on items recommended by the FLCCC on the off chance you're wrong.
Viruses only cause symptoms inside the body because that is where the cells whose machinery they need to hijack are found. And you can see viruses in electron micrographs. Bacteriophages are viruses that only kill bacteria and they are easily isolated, grown and stored in labs. Please stock up on items recommended by the FLCCC on the off chance you're wrong.
Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch (1843-1910) was one of the founders of modern microbiology. He devised the ‘gold standard’ you must meet to prove a pathogen, such as a bacterium, amoeba or virus. These four ‘postulates’ or principles of Koch have as their main requirement that the pathogen must be isolated from the patient in order to identify and therefore prove it. The isolated pathogen, according to the postulates, must then produce exactly the same symptoms of disease again in a host in order to be re-isolated.
And this:
"Viruses do not exist
What the medical establishment claims to be viruses, are manifestations of our own bodies that happen when there’s an insult. They are a reaction to toxins, a defense mechanism. They are not the cause of illness but the solution, created inside and by the body to solve a specific problem and they’re not transmissible.
We know they’re not transmissible because scientists tried to infect healthy people with the Spanish flu using fluids from the sick. They squirted the fluids in the nose, throat and even injected it. The healthy did NOT took ill.
So the idea of a virus as an infectious particle in the air or fluids causing infection and illness is false. That does not exist. At the very least, decent science to prove the notion does not exist".
Electron micrographs have been around much longer than software that can generate those images. Let's consider the measles, smallpox, or a hemorrhagic fever virus like Ebola. Each produces very specific visible signs that are pretty much only specific to those viruses. Each of those viruses produce different, unique symptoms and are found in everyone infected. If all that is really occurring is a reaction to a poor diet, lifestyle or toxic environmental exposure, please explain why people infected with any of those 3 viruses are experiencing such extremely unusual symptoms that aren't known for being symptoms of general unwellness? Ebola is found (for now) in Africa and not America. How are Africans abusing their body in such a way as to cause symptoms of Ebola that never happens to even one American?
AGAIN: please send me an EM of a virus or a bacteriophage. I asked for a photo that is NOT a computer generated image and you are avoiding the point and trying to make my point something other than what I asked for. My claim is not one virus has ever been isolated and shown to exist. Koch's postulates are the gold standard for establishing the causal relationships between pathogens and disease. If you can't satisfy the first postulate you have nothing. A small genetic snippet that has been grown in a cell culture does not satisfy the first postulate and is not a virus.
As for Smithsonian's article, I wonder who wrote it. Quote: ..."dangerous pathogens that cause disease, such as the current coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 causing a worldwide pandemic...". SARS-CoV-2 has never been identified by any lab anywhere in the world. The same goes for all "viruses". NOT EVEN ONE has been isolated. If I remember right, Steve even posted about this.
As for this statement of yours:
"Here is a paper about Koch's postulates satisfied for Sars". Maybe you didn't read the article from nih.gov because the title: "Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus" is a flat out lie. Why do I say that? The first line of their text starts out with: "According to Koch's postulates, as modified by Rivers...". NOT SATISFIED FOR KOCH, BUT SATISFIED FOR RIVERS. That is a HUGE difference!
Thank-you for finding me a pic of a bacteriophage. In your opening remark you stated they are viruses. According to MicroBiologyResearch.org they are not. Please search for this article: "Analysis of genetic recombination and the pan-genome of a highly recombinogenic bacteriophage species". Here is the first sentence from that article: "Bacteriophages are the most prevalent biological entities impacting on the ecosystem and are characterized by their extensive diversity". NOT A VIRUS, but a "biological entity".
I don't know how far you got in the Smithsonian but even though there will be things you disagree with, the history, which I promise you is accurate, is fascinating. The article you suggested from MicrobiologyReseach.org has a link to the full PDF paper:
Viruses only cause symptoms inside the body because that is where the cells whose machinery they need to hijack are found. And you can see viruses in electron micrographs. Bacteriophages are viruses that only kill bacteria and they are easily isolated, grown and stored in labs. Please stock up on items recommended by the FLCCC on the off chance you're wrong.
NOT EVEN ONE virus has ever been isolated, let alone photographed.
Please direct me to your photo of a bacteriophage that is not a computer generated image or drawing.
Then there is this:
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/lies-more-lies-and-damn-lies-from-those-we-are-mandated-to-trust
And this:
No proof without application of Koch’s Postulates
Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch (1843-1910) was one of the founders of modern microbiology. He devised the ‘gold standard’ you must meet to prove a pathogen, such as a bacterium, amoeba or virus. These four ‘postulates’ or principles of Koch have as their main requirement that the pathogen must be isolated from the patient in order to identify and therefore prove it. The isolated pathogen, according to the postulates, must then produce exactly the same symptoms of disease again in a host in order to be re-isolated.
And this:
"Viruses do not exist
What the medical establishment claims to be viruses, are manifestations of our own bodies that happen when there’s an insult. They are a reaction to toxins, a defense mechanism. They are not the cause of illness but the solution, created inside and by the body to solve a specific problem and they’re not transmissible.
We know they’re not transmissible because scientists tried to infect healthy people with the Spanish flu using fluids from the sick. They squirted the fluids in the nose, throat and even injected it. The healthy did NOT took ill.
So the idea of a virus as an infectious particle in the air or fluids causing infection and illness is false. That does not exist. At the very least, decent science to prove the notion does not exist".
https://wickedtruths.org/en/viruses-do-not-exist/
And this:
https://peripheralmind.blogspot.com/2020/03/viruses-do-not-exist-virus-hoax-created.html
I'm not a scientist, just an old retired guy who reads a lot. Believe it or not, I would rather discuss almost ANYTHING else than virology.
Totally unrelated, but you might love this. IMO the best song ever written:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZ59spYH9mk
Electron micrographs have been around much longer than software that can generate those images. Let's consider the measles, smallpox, or a hemorrhagic fever virus like Ebola. Each produces very specific visible signs that are pretty much only specific to those viruses. Each of those viruses produce different, unique symptoms and are found in everyone infected. If all that is really occurring is a reaction to a poor diet, lifestyle or toxic environmental exposure, please explain why people infected with any of those 3 viruses are experiencing such extremely unusual symptoms that aren't known for being symptoms of general unwellness? Ebola is found (for now) in Africa and not America. How are Africans abusing their body in such a way as to cause symptoms of Ebola that never happens to even one American?
AGAIN: please send me an EM of a virus or a bacteriophage. I asked for a photo that is NOT a computer generated image and you are avoiding the point and trying to make my point something other than what I asked for. My claim is not one virus has ever been isolated and shown to exist. Koch's postulates are the gold standard for establishing the causal relationships between pathogens and disease. If you can't satisfy the first postulate you have nothing. A small genetic snippet that has been grown in a cell culture does not satisfy the first postulate and is not a virus.
Here is an interesting article from the Smithsonian about the history of discovering viruses (with EMs) and they discuss Koch too:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-are-viruses-history-tobacco-mosaic-disease-180974480/
Here is a paper about Koch's postulates satisfied for Sars
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7095368/
Here is a paper with an EM of a bacteriophage
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Electron-micrograph-of-a-bacteriophage_fig2_307863150
Good luck.
As for Smithsonian's article, I wonder who wrote it. Quote: ..."dangerous pathogens that cause disease, such as the current coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 causing a worldwide pandemic...". SARS-CoV-2 has never been identified by any lab anywhere in the world. The same goes for all "viruses". NOT EVEN ONE has been isolated. If I remember right, Steve even posted about this.
As for this statement of yours:
"Here is a paper about Koch's postulates satisfied for Sars". Maybe you didn't read the article from nih.gov because the title: "Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus" is a flat out lie. Why do I say that? The first line of their text starts out with: "According to Koch's postulates, as modified by Rivers...". NOT SATISFIED FOR KOCH, BUT SATISFIED FOR RIVERS. That is a HUGE difference!
Thank-you for finding me a pic of a bacteriophage. In your opening remark you stated they are viruses. According to MicroBiologyResearch.org they are not. Please search for this article: "Analysis of genetic recombination and the pan-genome of a highly recombinogenic bacteriophage species". Here is the first sentence from that article: "Bacteriophages are the most prevalent biological entities impacting on the ecosystem and are characterized by their extensive diversity". NOT A VIRUS, but a "biological entity".
I don't know how far you got in the Smithsonian but even though there will be things you disagree with, the history, which I promise you is accurate, is fascinating. The article you suggested from MicrobiologyReseach.org has a link to the full PDF paper:
https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/docserver/fulltext/mgen/5/8/mgen000282.pdf?expires=1646877500&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=983717FEF667185CA6A5F3A00A876D9C
Read the first few sentences of the Introduction. See what you think.