An observation is that we have in Canada for eg something like 50% of those eligible have not gone past the first two shots. To me that seems like opportunity. Those folk are by and large 'soft' resistance, they are diffuse and unfocused as to why they didn't take another shot. Can we provide them some calm, factual material to help them…
An observation is that we have in Canada for eg something like 50% of those eligible have not gone past the first two shots. To me that seems like opportunity. Those folk are by and large 'soft' resistance, they are diffuse and unfocused as to why they didn't take another shot. Can we provide them some calm, factual material to help them understand why they were right? It is a LOT easier to convince someone they were right about something, than that they are wrong and have been fooled.
There are other emerging themes I think, all dependent on circumstance:
- provide a counter narrative that is believable to a typical normie. "Maybe it is just moderate corruption coupled with incompetent government agencies, crossed with pharma greed. And NO your doc is not in on it, he believes the system works fine, never lived through thalodomide, and is just following mistaken direction. It's all just really a big mistake, very unfortunate." Normies can perhaps believe that. However bring up the WEF, 5G, there are no viruses and you've handed them a reason to discount you forever.
-stick to factual matters, not horribly controversial. Provable. Use CDC data and pronouncements whenever possible. Never bring up anything you are not sure is provable.
- try to frame things as questions rather than assertions. Get the normies to explain where they are coming from. And politely leverage that.
- drop it instantly if they get 'tired' and just want to quit the whole discussions. Cognitive dissonance is very tiring, its a thing. The struggle to make it go away is a powerful impulse.
- be polite and steady. No alcohol (a personal rule haha). Never attack them personally.
A few observations. Kirsch is pretty heavy into repilling, he may believe as many do, that this is a struggle of ideas. And perhaps there are not so very many who are consciously and actively doing evil things? By which I mean even hospital administrators or bosses responsible for, eg, remsdesivir plus vents may not have fully comprehended what that really is. So our hope, and the 'cabal's' greatest fear. Not many would 'sign on' if they understood even a fraction of true things. And the vast majority can be redpilled, there is nothing inherently wrong with them. Just misled. What I choose to believe anyways.
And the books are powerful, IF you can get them read. Try introducing the Kennedy book as written by a noted anti-vaxxer, BUT that it has 1000+ references. 1000+, tell them repeatedly. The book stands on its own.
Been pondering shock videos. People dropping, people shaking uncontrollably. A video I only ever watched once but etched in my memory was a one month old baby shaking and vibrating uncontrollably. I cannot, cannot shake that. I wish I could. I may be using shock videos, humans are pretty visceral when it comes down to it.
And been wondering if music, or prose, can play a role. Say things indirectly in the matrix of the emotion created by the medium.
I have been thinking this hard and the above is not really complete, but felt I should drop something out there before this thread gets too old.
An observation is that we have in Canada for eg something like 50% of those eligible have not gone past the first two shots. To me that seems like opportunity. Those folk are by and large 'soft' resistance, they are diffuse and unfocused as to why they didn't take another shot. Can we provide them some calm, factual material to help them understand why they were right? It is a LOT easier to convince someone they were right about something, than that they are wrong and have been fooled.
There are other emerging themes I think, all dependent on circumstance:
- provide a counter narrative that is believable to a typical normie. "Maybe it is just moderate corruption coupled with incompetent government agencies, crossed with pharma greed. And NO your doc is not in on it, he believes the system works fine, never lived through thalodomide, and is just following mistaken direction. It's all just really a big mistake, very unfortunate." Normies can perhaps believe that. However bring up the WEF, 5G, there are no viruses and you've handed them a reason to discount you forever.
-stick to factual matters, not horribly controversial. Provable. Use CDC data and pronouncements whenever possible. Never bring up anything you are not sure is provable.
- try to frame things as questions rather than assertions. Get the normies to explain where they are coming from. And politely leverage that.
- drop it instantly if they get 'tired' and just want to quit the whole discussions. Cognitive dissonance is very tiring, its a thing. The struggle to make it go away is a powerful impulse.
- be polite and steady. No alcohol (a personal rule haha). Never attack them personally.
A few observations. Kirsch is pretty heavy into repilling, he may believe as many do, that this is a struggle of ideas. And perhaps there are not so very many who are consciously and actively doing evil things? By which I mean even hospital administrators or bosses responsible for, eg, remsdesivir plus vents may not have fully comprehended what that really is. So our hope, and the 'cabal's' greatest fear. Not many would 'sign on' if they understood even a fraction of true things. And the vast majority can be redpilled, there is nothing inherently wrong with them. Just misled. What I choose to believe anyways.
And the books are powerful, IF you can get them read. Try introducing the Kennedy book as written by a noted anti-vaxxer, BUT that it has 1000+ references. 1000+, tell them repeatedly. The book stands on its own.
Been pondering shock videos. People dropping, people shaking uncontrollably. A video I only ever watched once but etched in my memory was a one month old baby shaking and vibrating uncontrollably. I cannot, cannot shake that. I wish I could. I may be using shock videos, humans are pretty visceral when it comes down to it.
And been wondering if music, or prose, can play a role. Say things indirectly in the matrix of the emotion created by the medium.
I have been thinking this hard and the above is not really complete, but felt I should drop something out there before this thread gets too old.