I would think Richard's concern is that, if tromethamine was needed, why didn't they add it prior to the children's trial to test the actual affect and prove its safety before asking for an eua? It's completely untested, and unproven. Claiming it's safe and will do nothing is a theory not proof. Bleach on its own isn't horrible, but mixe…
I would think Richard's concern is that, if tromethamine was needed, why didn't they add it prior to the children's trial to test the actual affect and prove its safety before asking for an eua? It's completely untested, and unproven. Claiming it's safe and will do nothing is a theory not proof. Bleach on its own isn't horrible, but mixed w ammonia u have a problem. How can you conclusively say there won't be some strange unintended reaction by adding tromethamine to the solution, then into a child's body? It's interesting that now thst the jabs are out, and rhe elderly are still dying, it's explained away as 'well they're old w comorbidities'. The opposite happened to hype the danger of covid, age and comorbidities were just ignored and everyone was thrown into a panic. Now the jabs are proven to not prevent infection or transmission, and you and your pharma friends say 'well we never said you wouldn't get infected'. It's no wonder people are confused, they want to believe your type of rhetoric so badly, they simply do without question. They want things back to normal so badly, they'll continue to boost up w the same shit that didn't work the first two times, getting sick and spreading covid themselves on occasion, while they point what's left of their fingers at the unvaccinated as the cause of all their problems. It doesn't matter what you say, or what you post in relation to your pharma science, or what our govt officials say on a given day, they are corrupted and unreliable, to put it nicely, and they are not to be trusted.
I would think Richard's concern is that, if tromethamine was needed, why didn't they add it prior to the children's trial to test the actual affect and prove its safety before asking for an eua? It's completely untested, and unproven. Claiming it's safe and will do nothing is a theory not proof. Bleach on its own isn't horrible, but mixed w ammonia u have a problem. How can you conclusively say there won't be some strange unintended reaction by adding tromethamine to the solution, then into a child's body? It's interesting that now thst the jabs are out, and rhe elderly are still dying, it's explained away as 'well they're old w comorbidities'. The opposite happened to hype the danger of covid, age and comorbidities were just ignored and everyone was thrown into a panic. Now the jabs are proven to not prevent infection or transmission, and you and your pharma friends say 'well we never said you wouldn't get infected'. It's no wonder people are confused, they want to believe your type of rhetoric so badly, they simply do without question. They want things back to normal so badly, they'll continue to boost up w the same shit that didn't work the first two times, getting sick and spreading covid themselves on occasion, while they point what's left of their fingers at the unvaccinated as the cause of all their problems. It doesn't matter what you say, or what you post in relation to your pharma science, or what our govt officials say on a given day, they are corrupted and unreliable, to put it nicely, and they are not to be trusted.
or, he's just a troll