Just a question w regarding to point b, wasn't the overall mortality rate in the pfizer trial higher in the experimental group? Yes it was. Also, you state '
But worst of all, if the treatment appears to "work", you can't really be sure whether it worked or you just happened to give it to the least sick people who would have gotten bett…
Just a question w regarding to point b, wasn't the overall mortality rate in the pfizer trial higher in the experimental group? Yes it was. Also, you state '
But worst of all, if the treatment appears to "work", you can't really be sure whether it worked or you just happened to give it to the least sick people who would have gotten better at a higher rate than the more sick people even in the absence of the treatment." All of the vaccine makers developed the jabs using healthy test subjects who were unlimely to experience severe disease in the first place. Why do you devalue alternative treatments for this reason, while advocating for the effectiveness of the jabs??
Just a question w regarding to point b, wasn't the overall mortality rate in the pfizer trial higher in the experimental group? Yes it was. Also, you state '
But worst of all, if the treatment appears to "work", you can't really be sure whether it worked or you just happened to give it to the least sick people who would have gotten better at a higher rate than the more sick people even in the absence of the treatment." All of the vaccine makers developed the jabs using healthy test subjects who were unlimely to experience severe disease in the first place. Why do you devalue alternative treatments for this reason, while advocating for the effectiveness of the jabs??