“I am a "conspiracy theorist.” I believe men and women of wealth and power conspire. If you don't think so, then you are what is called "an idiot.” If you believe stuff but fear the label, you are what is called "a coward.”
-- David B. Collum
“I am a "conspiracy theorist.” I believe men and women of wealth and power conspire. If you don't think so, then you are what is called "an idiot.” If you believe stuff but fear the label, you are what is called "a coward.”
I read a great comment from a reader on Off-Guardian about not using the term "Conspircy Theorist". When someone calls you that just say that you are a"Conspircy Analylist".
Looking at all of the factors involved on a certain issue, it is very important to "analyize" the data and the sources. This is the responsible way to approach any issue. It takes more critical thinking, reading and research to arrive at this point.
Stay away from emotions....this is what the other side wants a person to do....get angry and get even. Give them some food for thought when they are finished stating their opinion.
In the end, they will be more frustrated with their point of view simply because they will not be able to defend it.
Lastly, I agree with you regarding men and women of power wanting to control the agenda of the scamdemic. We do have a pandemic but it is one of greed and fear. Stay on The Path. Peace.
"People do, on occasion, conspire. There are many theories. Some theories that appear to explain observed phemomena are plausible and supported by evidence. Some imaginative theories are not only unsupported by the evidence, but are implausible to the point of absurdity. If you regularly believe the latter kinds of theories, and further believe they involve a conspiracy, then you are indeed a conspiracy theorist and potentially you're a delusional idiot unwilling or unable to think critically and fairly assess the whole of the evidence."
-CanYouEvenSpellmRNA
1. If SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon, it's a pathetic one. Far better choices existed.
2. The best available evidence is in no way compatible with the bioweapon theory, it's compatible with zoonotic origin, which is consist with past outbreaks (SARS in 2002, MERS in 2012, Zika, Ebola, West Nile, etc.).
Go do some research to learn why the lab leak theory is simply not substantiated by the genomic evidence, even if you believe the preposterous conspiracy theory idea that the Wuhan lab was a gain of function bioweapon facility. 🤨
Anyone who wants a serious discussion can read this paper about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the genomic evidence, and respond.
“I am a "conspiracy theorist.” I believe men and women of wealth and power conspire. If you don't think so, then you are what is called "an idiot.” If you believe stuff but fear the label, you are what is called "a coward.”
-- David B. Collum
That statement is perfect! And made me laugh, as well!
I read a great comment from a reader on Off-Guardian about not using the term "Conspircy Theorist". When someone calls you that just say that you are a"Conspircy Analylist".
Looking at all of the factors involved on a certain issue, it is very important to "analyize" the data and the sources. This is the responsible way to approach any issue. It takes more critical thinking, reading and research to arrive at this point.
Stay away from emotions....this is what the other side wants a person to do....get angry and get even. Give them some food for thought when they are finished stating their opinion.
In the end, they will be more frustrated with their point of view simply because they will not be able to defend it.
Lastly, I agree with you regarding men and women of power wanting to control the agenda of the scamdemic. We do have a pandemic but it is one of greed and fear. Stay on The Path. Peace.
"People do, on occasion, conspire. There are many theories. Some theories that appear to explain observed phemomena are plausible and supported by evidence. Some imaginative theories are not only unsupported by the evidence, but are implausible to the point of absurdity. If you regularly believe the latter kinds of theories, and further believe they involve a conspiracy, then you are indeed a conspiracy theorist and potentially you're a delusional idiot unwilling or unable to think critically and fairly assess the whole of the evidence."
-CanYouEvenSpellmRNA
1. If SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon, it's a pathetic one. Far better choices existed.
2. The best available evidence is in no way compatible with the bioweapon theory, it's compatible with zoonotic origin, which is consist with past outbreaks (SARS in 2002, MERS in 2012, Zika, Ebola, West Nile, etc.).
Go do some research to learn why the lab leak theory is simply not substantiated by the genomic evidence, even if you believe the preposterous conspiracy theory idea that the Wuhan lab was a gain of function bioweapon facility. 🤨
Anyone who wants a serious discussion can read this paper about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the genomic evidence, and respond.
https://www.cell.com/cell/pdf/S0092-8674(21)00991-0.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjHwJr0kpL0AhWFNX0KHT9AD8Q4ChAWegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw0iEsZ7x3_MUNV63LEutmTs
Correct link: https://www.cell.com/cell/pdf/S0092-8674(21)00991-0.pdf