How would one estimate the bias from a survey with a voluntary response? (e.g. could it be that people who did not know anyone who died fail to respond to the survey more often than people who do know someone who died?) And what bias is introduced by this particular and non-representative population: those who are subscribed to Steve Kir…
How would one estimate the bias from a survey with a voluntary response? (e.g. could it be that people who did not know anyone who died fail to respond to the survey more often than people who do know someone who died?) And what bias is introduced by this particular and non-representative population: those who are subscribed to Steve Kirsch's substack?
I don't understand how we will get a reliable signal out of this data set.
That is the point. There were some lots that had a lot of death. That got spread over 6-12 states. Then some lots were in 1-2 states we think it was to hide the lots
How would one estimate the bias from a survey with a voluntary response? (e.g. could it be that people who did not know anyone who died fail to respond to the survey more often than people who do know someone who died?) And what bias is introduced by this particular and non-representative population: those who are subscribed to Steve Kirsch's substack?
I don't understand how we will get a reliable signal out of this data set.
Look at Jessica Roses info she is pulling VAERS Data and biologic statistician. Shes American but living in Israel.
I think you can find her on Rumble.
She says there is under reporting because it is hard to get the data in
That is the point. There were some lots that had a lot of death. That got spread over 6-12 states. Then some lots were in 1-2 states we think it was to hide the lots